This arrogant disregard for the accuracy of what you accuse them of, but you'll do them another poster so it's all ok. How lovely.
and what exactly have you done for them except blindly defend??This arrogant disregard for the accuracy of what you accuse them of, but you'll do them another poster so it's all ok. How lovely.
Ever heard of reflexivity, teuchter?
You've asked this before and I've answered it already.and what exactly have you done for them except blindly defend??
If it's a concept you think can be used to construct an excuse for editor's behaviour then I am all ears.
No, it's a practice that you need to apply to yourself if you want to escape your own cuntitude, nothing to do with anyone else.
Go on then, tell me what and how.
It would be nice if you could sometimes post something that had some kind of content that there would be any point in responding to.
teuchter: You've stated that you're only interested in a fair fight, that you want "just the facts m'lud" and for nobody or thing to go misrepresented.
But you seem go about it in a deliberately prickly way. I think that you know exactly what sort of reaction your comments will get, and make them that way on purpose. It makes you feel good when your opponents act in the way you predicted them to, and find this more rewarding than satisfying your original purported goals. Am I anywhere near the mark?
teuchter: You've stated that you're only interested in a fair fight, that you want "just the facts m'lud" and for nobody or thing to go misrepresented.
But you seem go about it in a deliberately prickly way. I think that you know exactly what sort of reaction your comments will get, and make them that way on purpose. It makes you feel good when your opponents act in the way you predicted them to, and find this more rewarding than satisfying your original purported goals. Am I anywhere near the mark?
It's simple. You look inward in a detached manner and assess whether what you're saying is reasoned, or whether it's informed by your prejudices, petty dislikes and biases.
Strip away your pettiness, bickering and self-righteousness and what's left, teuchter?
Fair enough. I just ignore it and move on. I come here for fun, and if I'm not having fun, I don't take part. Don't feel the need to get myself wound up by other peoples inconsistencies.
No one I know in the block even saw the proposal that was stuck on a bit of A4 inside the window in tiny writing. I really think that premises should be compelled to at least stick a few notices to lampposts when they were (originally) asking for something as drastic as a near 24-hour/7day a week music and drink licence.
24/7?
Yes. They wanted the place to have a drinks and music licence that let them stay open from 8am right through to 5am, every day and night of the week, including Sundays.The Brixton Blog thing says they are asking for a 2am license - were they originally asking for more than that?
The Brixton Blog thing says they are asking for a 2am license - were they originally asking for more than that?
i am shocked that you are deliberately misquoting!, shocked i tell thee!24/7?
They've now covered up the entire artwork and associated scrawls, with a blue sheet masking the entire frontage.
I presume this is because of the Olympic Torch.
Fair enough. I just ignore it and move on. I come here for fun, and if I'm not having fun, I don't take part. Don't feel the need to get myself wound up by other peoples inconsistencies.
teuchter: You've stated that you're only interested in a fair fight, that you want "just the facts m'lud" and for nobody or thing to go misrepresented.
But you seem go about it in a deliberately prickly way. I think that you know exactly what sort of reaction your comments will get, and make them that way on purpose. It makes you feel good when your opponents act in the way you predicted them to, and find this more rewarding than satisfying your original purported goals. Am I anywhere near the mark?