snowy_again
Slush
Through a certain prism though. Nothing wrong with that but it needs to be recognised.
That's a bit difficult when one side fraudulently uses the Heir to the Throne to tell the world (except Coldharbour Lane) how NEECE they are - and in need of MONEY!! GRANTS!!!This thread is like 'dirty looks across a room at school'. Both parties should try engage each other and communicate and see where it goes instead of this shit.
Boohoo - sorry to take issue - but do people in Social Housing want to dress up as Edwardian floozies and take the piss out of the poor? For £40? Your world seems to have more to do with Jarndice and Jarndice than Coldharbour Lane!Do the people in social housing not spend this kind of money?
The pub had closed. You are saying that people in social housing only like a certain type of thing? The meal wasn't for toffs. it was for those who choose to spend £40 on a meal. i'm sure there are men and women who live in social housing who spend that kind of money down the pub or in a bar at the weekend. Do we have to exclude certain things from the area because we (that is the outspoken of urban75) think it's not appropriate? What if it was a West Indian Supper club at £40 - would it be equally as wrong?
Fraudulently? Some of the hyperbole in here.....That's a bit difficult when one side fraudulently uses the Heir to the Throne to tell the world (except Coldharbour Lane) how NEECE they are - and in need of MONEY!! GRANTS!!!
All the time not even speaking (engaging perhaps - in "grant-speak") with anybody from "the local community" - which by the way also includes black people, alcoholics standing outside shops, black people standing outside shops ("hanging out") and bankrupt claimants standing outside William Hills ("hanging out").
What has this marvellous project got to offer THEM.
Notwithstanding that they want a grant just to be NEECE ignoring us in Coldharbour Lane!
I think you should consider your position - and wash your finger.
Kanda said:This thread is like 'dirty looks across a room at school'. Both parties should try engage each other and communicate and see where it goes instead of this shit.
Boohoo - sorry to take issue - but do people in Social Housing want to dress up as Edwardian floozies and take the piss out of the poor? For £40? Your world seems to have more to do with Jarndice and Jarndice than Coldharbour Lane!
I may be old fashioned but if I was a Metropolitan housing officer I wouldn't be that sympathetic if someone in my social housing needed to spend their rent money on fripperies such as this. Meanwhile spitting on the poor (who probably do actually pay their rent).
Get real:View attachment 20629
Surely a trollBoohoo - sorry to take issue - but do people in Social Housing want to dress up as Edwardian floozies and take the piss out of the poor? For £40? Your world seems to have more to do with Jarndice and Jarndice than Coldharbour Lane!
I may be old fashioned but if I was a Metropolitan housing officer I wouldn't be that sympathetic if someone in my social housing needed to spend their rent money on fripperies such as this. Meanwhile spitting on the poor (who probably do actually pay their rent).
Get real:View attachment 20629
Brickbox reminds me very much of the organisation that ran the 'pop-up' club Shunt in London.
Here's an ecstatic review I found on the Internet:
http://www.urban75.org/2009/04/shunt-club-london-bridge-absolutely.html
Not only are they similar to Shunt. They are run by the same people.Did they claim to be a community group that likes to hang out where the 'street drinkers are and when the bins are kept'?
Did they take over a traditional West Indian pub and start putting on exclusive £40 toff dinners?
Did their premises face social housing?
No? Oh, I'll have to look elsewhere for your 'point', then.
http://www.eventbrite.com/event/3733515044
another 40 quid dinner tonight, aimed at those people with money who also find the expression "slippery nipple" humourous.
Yes we know. Look up there, where it was posted before ^^
Why is this place receiving lottery funding if they're charging £40 for a ticket to things like this? Surely that's self-funding...?
gabi said:Why is this place receiving lottery funding if they're charging £40 for a ticket to things like this? Surely that's self-funding...?
Sage question..
were there any events at shunt that were £40?
Who would be the correct person/organisation to ask this question of? There's plenty of other initatives i can think of in brixton who could use a cash injection from the lottery.. maybe they're not aware that this is the kind of thing they're funding?
are you an artist or wanna be 'artist SLASH curator' teuchter?
And your point is?
Shunt was not part of BB community interest company. Shunt from review was a nightclub pure and simple. BB was set up as CIC so it is different issue.