Talking of HMICFRS reports on protests which have been published in March...The HMICFRS report is here:
A real corker. ‘A different officer recorded in his statement: “Some of the verbal abuse directed at officers was some of the worst I have come across in my 16 years of policing.”’
The official policing inspectorate showed repeated bias in favour of the police and against peaceful protesters as it compiled a report which backed a government clampdown, a whistleblower has alleged.
The complainant says a report on protest released in March this year was skewed in favour of the government view, with conclusions reached before evidence was gathered and assessed.
The Guardian has learned that the whistleblower, Alice O’Keeffe, has officially complained to her bosses at Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire and Rescue Services (HMICFRS). She believes the civil service code was breached. HMICFRS said it was assessing her claims.
Her formal written complaint contains allegations that HMICFRS told the home secretary in a private letter it backed the need to change protest laws five months before its report was published.
It is also alleged that some in the inquiry team, which was mainly made up of serving and former police officers, likened peaceful protesters to the IRA, which waged a terrorist campaign against the UK.
Iron fist and iron paw salute to this mighty canine!
But WTF is with letting him off the hook on crucial details, and flopping the passive voice all over the shop?‘Hugely regrettable’ to bullshit about broken bones
Bristol police chief accepts force was slow to correct protest injury claims
Mark Runacres says claim officers had bones broken at ‘kill the bill’ event were ‘hugely regrettable’www.theguardian.com
Pretty sure that's part of the entrance examwhile he doesn't regret them beating the shit out of a couple of women (that I've seen) at all
Amusing?Amusing watching from Scotland where it has no effect.
My point is that English and Scottish approach to crime and punishment. Most of the rightward moves in England are absent here. The question is "Why are they. Necessary in Carlisle but not in Glasgow." Our policies are not driven by Mail, Express, or Tory dog whistle politics!Amusing?
On the face of it, that sounds cuntish.
Amusing?
On the face of it, that sounds cuntish.
i wonder how you'd feel if someone from england said yeh it's hilarious watching scottish cops whack protesting womenAmusing watching from Scotland where it has no effect.
act like a wanker, get called a wanker. it's the way of the world. if you don't want your cuntishness pointed out, don't be a cunt. it's that simple.My point is that English and Scottish approach to crime and punishment. Most of the rightward moves in England are absent here. The question is "Why are they. Necessary in Carlisle but not in Glasgow." Our policies are not driven by Mail, Express, or Tory dog whistle politics!
Ad hominem abuse is not a particularly constructive method of debate.
people south of the borderAn injury to one is an injury to... bugger, how does the rest of the sentence go again?
Onto ignore as a time waster.act like a wanker, get called a wanker. it's the way of the world. if you don't want your cuntishness pointed out, don't be a cunt. it's that simple.
I am talking about the reactionary laws that England seems to rely on. Not English policing.i wonder how you'd feel if someone from england said yeh it's hilarious watching scottish cops whack protesting women
i suppose tears stream down your face with mirth when you consider the legal powers available to the authorities in the people's republic of chinaI am talking about the reactionary laws that England seems to rely on. Not English policing.
the truth hurts i seeOnto ignore as a time waster.