Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Accused rapist Ched Evans to be released from prison

So was she concious when the first footballer was having sex?
she was judged to have been conscious enough when she agreed for him to take her back to the hotel, that when he did fuck her, he had good reason to believe there was consent. She was completely smashed when Evans arrived (not at her invitation), and so he had no good reason to believe she had given meaningful consent.
 
a few come mind - Lee Hughes - ex West Brom, Coventry and a few other clubs - dangerous driving - he killed somone - got 6 years, was released after 3 - got a club fairly quickly but at a lower level than before - playing Conference football now. Luke McCormick, killed 2 kids in a car crash, got 7 years, released after 3 and a half - and eventually did return to his former club (Plymouth) and was recently made club captain . Marlon King, for numerous offences, including fraud, driving offences, violent offences, sexual assault - currently banged up but has played for various clubs between spells of being banged up (he is currently banged up) Jermain Pennant played with a tag (I think for Liverpool or Birmingham) and I'm sure there are many other players or ex -players who have served time. Having said that I think Hughes and McCormick did admit their guilt and issued statements of apology and regret - Evans continues to protest his innocence and his video statement just said he'd made a mistake and was unfaithful - no apology to the victim at all
Hughes refuses to discuss the whole thing and his victims don't really feel that his statement of regret was sincere.

When there were rumours that my club were interested in signing him the other week, the vast majority of fans expressed unease about it ranging from not applauding him or his goals to outright boycott if he signed.

Incidentally, David Pipe was released by us shortly before his conviction for assaulting a man by smashing a champagne bottle over his head. Since his release he has played for Newport County and Forest Green Rovers (Hughes' current club). Maybe Evans could join them, they don't seem to mind.
 
Hughes refuses to discuss the whole thing and his victims don't really feel that his statement of regret was sincere.

When there were rumours that my club were interested in signing him the other week, the vast majority of fans expressed unease about it ranging from not applauding him or his goals to outright boycott if he signed.

Incidentally, David Pipe was released by us shortly before his conviction for assaulting a man by smashing a champagne bottle over his head. Since his release he has played for Newport County and Forest Green Rovers (Hughes' current club). Maybe Evans could join them, they don't seem to mind.
Evans was probably about to get a big money move , I think someone said he was on 20k a week before the rape - I don't hink FGR can match that:hmm: he probably has 'advisors' telling him that he can still play in the premiership and earn £100k a week :facepalm:

I agree with your comment about Hughes - I think my point was that there was an element of accepting that they had committed the crime - Evans has consistently refused to admit that he did anything wrong at all
 
After King's Conviction for sexual assault the PFA said it was none of their business and wouldn't be supporting him after he did his time if he was looking for a way back into the game. Hodgson was then his nominal manager and said he could fuck off and this was a clear moral matter. Wenger said of course he can come back.
 
she was judged to have been conscious enough when she agreed for him to take her back to the hotel, that when he did fuck her, he had good reason to believe there was consent. She was completely smashed when Evans arrived (not at her invitation), and so he had no good reason to believe she had given meaningful consent.

So she was smashed as in really drunk but concious or smashed as in passed out when evans raped her?
 
After King's Conviction for sexual assault the PFA said it was none of their business and wouldn't be supporting him after he did his time if he was looking for a way back into the game. Hodgson was then his nominal manager and said he could fuck off and this was a clear moral matter. Wenger said of course he can come back.
King is currently serving 18 months so may well try and get back into the game when he comes out , he is still relatively young (32/33?) He may well end up at FGR
 
King is currently serving 18 months so may well try and get back into the game when he comes out , he is still relatively young (32/33?) He may well end up at FGR
This conviction i meant was 5 years ago though. The PFA stance seems to have changed since then and Hodgson has not said anything this time despite his higher profile role.
 
This conviction i meant was 5 years ago though. The PFA stance seems to have changed since then and Hodgson has not said anything this time despite his higher profile role.
ok, King has been banged up a lot, probably me that was confused about the time frame
 
Worth pointing out that Evans hasn't merely refused to acknowledge his guilt, he's appealing to have his conviction overturned. Clearly he has the legal right to do that, but it's taking the piss to think he can slot back into his former lucrative career while that's going on.

You almost wonder if the current business with the training/possible return to SU or elsewhere is supposed to be part of a PR campaign aimed at influencing his appeal, but either he or his advisors must be crazy if they think this is going to help.

So she was smashed as in really drunk but concious or smashed as in passed out when evans raped her?

All this has been gone through in some detail earlier in the thread. It might be worth going back to have a read, although there's been some nasty shit which might be better avoided, unfortunately.
 
a few come mind - Lee Hughes - ex West Brom, Coventry and a few other clubs - dangerous driving - he killed somone - got 6 years, was released after 3 - got a club fairly quickly but at a lower level than before - playing Conference football now.
Hughes was playing for Notts County when I saw them playing Tranmere. Had to put up with chants of 'murderer' for the whole game, same at Sheffield United, ironically enough. Couldn't have made it easy for him, or his team-mates.
 
Worth pointing out that Evans hasn't merely refused to acknowledge his guilt, he's appealing to have his conviction overturned. Clearly he has the legal right to do that, but it's taking the piss to think he can slot back into his former lucrative career while that's going on.

You almost wonder if the current business with the training/possible return to SU or elsewhere is supposed to be part of a PR campaign aimed at influencing his appeal, but either he or his advisors must be crazy if they think this is going to help.



All this has been gone through in some detail earlier in the thread. It might be worth going back to have a read, although there's been some nasty shit which might be better avoided, unfortunately.
I'd be fairly sure he knows he has no chance of being re-signed till his final appeal has gone through. He'll be hoping he'll be found not guilty, and all the opposition will go quickly away. It wont, of course, even if his conviction is overturned. And that doesn't seem likely.
 
Hughes was playing for Notts County when I saw them playing Tranmere. Had to put up with chants of 'murderer' for the whole game, same at Sheffield United, ironically enough. Couldn't have made it easy for him, or his team-mates.
yep, I can imagine - he must have money issues to continue playing , he is 38 now and still playing, given what you said, it can't be for the joy of playing
 
I'd be fairly sure he knows he has no chance of being re-signed till his final appeal has gone through. He'll be hoping he'll be found not guilty, and all the opposition will go quickly away. It wont, of course, even if his conviction is overturned. And that doesn't seem likely.

You'd think so, but surely then the thing to do would be to keep his head down for the time being, rather than continuing to ensure that the story of him as an unrepentant rapist is in the news every day :confused:
 
You'd think so, but surely then the thing to do would be to keep his head down for the time being, rather than continuing to ensure that the story of him as an unrepentant rapist is in the news every day :confused:
it is huge profile - discussed on Question Time, regularly in the main news buletins
 
This conviction i meant was 5 years ago though. The PFA stance seems to have changed since then and Hodgson has not said anything this time despite his higher profile role.
Has anybody in football said anything publicly about this,one way or the other?
 
You'd think so, but surely then the thing to do would be to keep his head down for the time being, rather than continuing to ensure that the story of him as an unrepentant rapist is in the news every day :confused:
he needs to get into a state whereby he's fit enough to sign as soon as his appeal is heard, i guess
 
he needs to get into a state whereby he's fit enough to sign as soon as his appeal is heard, i guess

Or he thinks he needs to do that.

This behaviour just strikes me as another facet of his arrogance, thinking only about himself and complete lack of remorse/responsibility, which ultimately is likely to prevent him from getting back where he wants to be, at least I hope it is.
 
Or he thinks he needs to do that.

This behaviour just strikes me as another facet of his arrogance, thinking only about himself and complete lack of remorse/responsibility, which ultimately is likely to prevent him from getting back where he wants to be, at least I hope it is.

Yes. He seems unable to think of himself as a rapist, to understand what he did and try to make amends for it, and he is being enabled in this denialism by the people around him. His self-image is more important than the safety/security/peace of mind of his victim, whom he still treats as though she is worth nothing and beneath normal human consideration.
 
I can't see how he can become a professional footballer again

They are usually contracted to do so many hours of charity, community and youth work, which he will not be able to fulfill

I agree that people who have served their time should be rehabilitated, and able work again to make a living
However, a convicted rapist would not be allowed to return to their old occupation of, say, nursery school teacher, as it would not be appropriate and this, I feel, is the case here

This is where football clubs could take a stand
 
So she was smashed as in really drunk but concious or smashed as in passed out when evans raped her?
Only Evans, McDonald and possibly their two mates know that.

This is where the judgement seems inconsistent to me. She could consent to McDonald while drunk, but not to Evans while in the same state. In sentencing, the judge said this: '
"The complainant was extremely intoxicated. CCTV footage shows, in my view, the extent of her intoxication when she stumbled into your friend. She was in no condition to have sexual intercourse."

But from what I can tell, that was not the verdict of the jury. The verdict of the jury was that she did consent to McDonald while that drunk, or at least he had good reason to think she had.

She woke up not knowing where she was, not remembering going to the hotel, and convinced her drink had been spiked. She had not experienced an alcohol blackout before, but her drinking the night before is consistent with having had one - four double vodkas and a sambuca in quick succession is a recipe for a possible blackout.

That doesn't say much either way about the state she had been in in the hotel room. But even by Evans' version, these two used her and threw her away. Taking her to a hotel for sex then abandoning her there was a despicable thing to do. Then he rather sealed his own fate, I think, by trying to make out she was a liar in court. At the very, very least, there is a big problem with the attitude towards women displayed by Evans, McDonald and their two mates. Even their version of events shows them to have acted in a very nasty way.
 
This is where football clubs could take a stand

I seriously doubt that. If they can allow other footballers to return to the fray who have been convicted of other crimes back into the game-not to mention the behaviour of other footballers like John Terry and Suarez with their racism I'd suggest we can expect very little from the clubs.
 
Only Evans, McDonald and possibly their two mates know that.

This is where the judgement seems inconsistent to me. She could consent to McDonald while drunk, but not to Evans while in the same state. ...

As I understand it, and as was covered extensively earlier in the thread, the two verdicts depended not on whether the victim actually gave consent (she couldn't remember giving consent to either) but on the legal question of whether each defendant could have had a reasonable belief that she consented.

If you go back and read the first few pages of the thread, it should be reasonably clear.
 
This is all just about shite sentencing.

Once someone's served their time they should be considered rehabilitated and able to continue their employment. If they're not rehabilitated they shouldn't be released. Evans clearly isn't if he still thinks he didn't rape the woman.

So his sentence should be extended.

Thats dodgy territory surely? Evans may actually believe or has convinced himself of his innocence-in fact plenty of people plead their innocence-I dont think pleading your innocence is the basis for extending a sentence after already being sentenced by due process.

Unless of course one of the measures of rehabilitation is an admittance of guilt for the parole board?
 
As I understand it, and as was covered extensively earlier in the thread, the two verdicts depended not on whether the victim actually gave consent (she couldn't remember giving consent to either) but on the legal question of whether each defendant could have had a reasonable belief that she consented.

If you go back and read the first few pages of the thread, it should be reasonably clear.
Yes, I know. It still doesn't really square up for me. Sounds to me that the judge had prepared to sentence both of them. We're in dangerous territory here with the idea that merely agreeing to go to a hotel with someone is taken to be consent to sex.
 
Back
Top Bottom