Well it wouldn’t cost them more. But wouldn’t help them either.I thought I read that going bankrupt wouldn't help them.
I vote for make them do both. A heritage site and a viable pub.Apparently they've agreed to rebuild it, but on the condition they build it somewhere else.
Crooked House owners agree to rebuild iconic pub on one condition
The iconic pub is being rebuilt brick-by-brick- But there's a catch.metro.co.uk
Not only that, but I suspect that this will be the opening move in a game which aims to water down the rebuilding proposals to save costs, to the point where they'll end up with something that barely resembles what they destroyed.The idea being that if they rebuild it elsewhere they can go ahead and sell the site or redevelop it with healthy profit as originally planned eh.
It's going to cost them a fortune to rebuild the pub, regardless of location.The idea being that if they rebuild it elsewhere they can go ahead and sell the site or redevelop it with healthy profit as originally planned eh.
the guardian, 1/8/24 Crooked House pub campaigners say they won’t let rebuilding plans die - the bbc came rather late to thisBBC keeping the topic in the news
How The Crooked House fire fuelled a resistance movement
One year on, fans of The Crooked House still hope it can be rebuilt.www.bbc.co.uk
Too busy ingesting the latest "guidelines" from top brass, no doubtthe guardian, 1/8/24 Crooked House pub campaigners say they won’t let rebuilding plans die - the bbc came rather late to this
i've never heard it called that beforeToo busy ingesting the latest "guidelines" from top brass, no doubt