Post.Black people this, women that, I'm just glad that someone is at long last standing up for the hypotheticals.
Black people this, women that, I'm just glad that someone is at long last standing up for the hypotheticals.
It's telling that much of the argument against my position relies on a dishonest caricature of it.
QED.Yeah and blackface is a dishonest caricature of POC but your all for it, eh.
Keep going mate. You're only making yourself look like a tit
Long time before I catch up with you.
The wit on that
Keep going mate. You're only making yourself look like a tit
Nothing like the sight of a white man insisting to women of colour that he knows better about racism :thumbs :
Presumably you've chosen to ignore the views of Mariane Pearl, another woman of colour. Convenient for you.
No idea who she is tbh, does she post on urban?
Sorry, Noel Coward, how could I ever compete with:
It was a statement of fact not a joke, silly
Not to my knowledge, but she was quoted earlier on the thread. Don't let these inconvenient facts put you off the comedic sniping, though.
But we live in this world. Because of its baggage, white people blacking up isn't a neutral thing to do. And in the case of films - yes, even in the case of Angelina Jolie and Mariane Pearl - it's a product of, and a reinforcement of, structural inequalities. Taken as a whole, mainstream representation of black women in particular in US films is rather shocking, no? A white woman plays a mixed race part. Meanwhile a mixed race woman like Halle Berry gets the parts of black women. There are very few black female film stars in the US, and very few mainstream directors who create roles for them.Yeah, because that's exactly what motivated me - the rights of imaginary white people. Not a rejection of a demonstrably nonsensical moral absolute, which, as I've explained, I don't consider to be the most effective way of countering racism.
It's telling that much of the argument against my position relies on a dishonest caricature of it.
Okay, so so far it's you and one non-poster who you've decided supports you in correcting the women of colour you're insisting are wrong about racism.
In your opinion, what are the circumstances in which it is acceptable for a white person to disagree with a person of colour regarding race?
btw in the case of Mariane Pearl, she's doing publicity for her film. I wouldn't take anything she says particularly seriously. What else is she going to say? It's pr fluff. She's making $$$$$.
Too busy listening to people to start worrying about hypotheticals.
Handy for you.
Well yeah, means I don't end up spending my days shouting at people why I know better than them.
I have recognised that she is promoting her film. She's bound to talk up how perfect her star is in that film. It is naive to think that this has anything to do with sincerity. She may or may not be sincere, I don't know. But no, I don't take pr guff seriously. And neither should you.So, notwithstanding the absence of any evidence that she's not sincere, you've discounted what she said. And it just happens to undermine your argument. A bit too convenient.
I have recognised that she is promoting her film. She's bound to talk up how perfect her star is in that film. It is naive to think that this has anything to do with sincerity. She may or may not be sincere, I don't know. But no, I don't take pr guff seriously. And neither should you.
I'm saying that she is doing pr for her film. Have you not seen Hollywood pr before? It's always like this.This isn't a case where she's required to offer an ex post facto justification; she specifically states that she chose Jolie because of the connection between them. Are you saying she's lying?
I'm saying that she is doing pr for her film. Have you not seen Hollywood pr before? It's always like this.
This is showbusiness, baby.