Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

*What book are you reading ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
D'wards said:
Yeah - i only average about 20-25 books a year (the national average is 3 a year:rolleyes: ) and have about 100 books to read that i have purchased from charity shops - 4-5 years worth.

I belive there are enough books i would want to read that i could read one a week for the rest of my life and never get them all done - depressing innit:(

I used to be like that, but now I make sure I never have more than one book in my flat that i haven't read yet, and stick to only having one book on the go at a time. I used to have stacks of unread books and it did get a bit depressing.
 
Dubversion said:
what a totally fucking pathetic comment.

(oh, and who do you reckon reads all the Andy McNabb / Alistair McLean / Frederick Forsyth books? all gun-laden covers and cartoon violence).

Point taken, but i see a lot more women reading chick lit stuff than men reading that geezer stuff on trains, which is where i gauge the tastes of the nation, so to speak.

I'm not having a go - good to read anything, and most men read fuck all, which is worse than reading pap
 
read Harry Crews' Feast Of Snakes over a couple of sleepless nights. Pretty good, but a little obvious, almost OTT. Not a patch on the Gospel Singer
 
just getting into 'star Maker' by Olaf Stapleton, it's amazing, truly epic, yet not that hard to read.


highly recommended
 
Dirty Martini said:
I'm going to have to get me The Gospel Singer, someone else recommended it to me the other day.


demented preachers, swamps, hillbillies, a freakshow, sexual guilt, a lynching and a storm and a dwarf with a massive foot. What more could you possible want? :)
 
Dubversion said:
demented preachers, swamps, hillbillies, a freakshow, sexual guilt, a lynching and a storm and a dwarf with a massive foot. What more could you possible want? :)

Not a great deal more, to be fair.

Weaponry?
 
Dubversion said:
demented preachers, swamps, hillbillies, a freakshow, sexual guilt, a lynching and a storm and a dwarf with a massive foot. What more could you possible want? :)

Ooh that sounds good. :)

Persuasion, Jane Austen
 
Finished The Prone Gunman. It was OK, read like an extended treatment for a French crime thriller, shit ending.

Now it's Why Read? by Mark Edmundson.
 
"This thing of darkness" Harry Thompson

Apparently it only took Darwin five years to sail around the world on board the Beagle. It's going to take me much longer to finish this book. Perahps thats the point. But 700 pages of Darwin and Fitzroy keeping aplomb with spoons up their backsides while polishing the turds of Galapagos' turtles wore thin along time ago.
 
Terry Pratchett's Feet of Clay yeah I know its below comics (which are lit/art in their own right but you know what i mean) but its just somthing to while away the tube but it did make me laugh like this bit.-
Dwarfs regard baking as part of the art of warfare. When they make rock cakes, no simile is intended. Most dwarf breads were in classic cowpat-like shape, an echo of their taste, but there were also buns, close-combat crumpets, deadly throwing toast, drop-scones (deadly at short range) and a vast array of other shapes devised by a race that went in for food-fighting in a big and above all terminal way.

also
Stupid White Men Michael Moore which is shocking the level of idiocy in but not only amerika, aparently in 2002 44 million americans couldnt read or write at all. They ony read 99 hours a year compared to 1460 hours watching TV.
The amount of tax the auto makers dont pay and this was written 6 years ago so with GWB it cant have got any better. :(
 
Dirty Martini said:
Lionel's kidnapping by a group of Zen doormen makes it into my all-time favourite comic set-pieces, just brilliant :D
That is the best bit :)
I had such an urge to shout eatmebailey for days.
Off out to look for books, armed, as ever, with this thread. Special miision to find something by...gasp...a woman. Fear it may be A.M.Homes, because that's all I liked the look of last time I went.
 
Just finished The Good Soldier by Ford Madox Ford, really enjoyed it and it's especially interesting if you've read Joseph Conrad as you can see his influence on it.
 
I finished Why Read? by Mark Edmundson, which I enjoyed a lot despite agreeing with about half of it.

His argument is this:

Literature can provide 'vital options' in the reader's quest to find the good life.

It can replace religious faith in that respect.

You wouldn't know this from the way it is taught at universities, where disinterested enquiry and interpretation are promoted in the humanities.

The prevailing culture in the US is the culture of 'cool'. It has its acute pleasures, but is no good if you are going to study literature. Students of literature need to embarrass themselves and fail. Suspicion falls on anyone who shows enthusiasm and emotion in their study.

Theory encourages students to believe that they are better and know more than the (great) authors they are studying. They have not earned this right.

Theory does have its uses, though, but applying Foucault to a literary text like a piece of translation software is daft.

Literary theory represents the ultimate kowtow to authority because it has been inserted into American literature departments as a response to the perceived need to provide students with a specific body of knowledge that they can take forward into employment. This is part of the fierce competition between universities for students and their money, ie a marketing tool.

A great many English professors despise the writers they study.

Readers should become disciples of the authors they like, and allow themselves to be read by great books.

We only think the field of literature has been strip-mined (which leads bright graduates to study little-known areas of literature against their better instincts) because we haven't been asking the right questions of it.

And so on.

His quiet, genial insistence that the 'good life' is attainable, and worthwhile attaining, is reminiscent of Adam Phillips. I like it, but his thesis seems to ignore the pleasures to be gained from work that lies outside the canon. He's big on the concept of the 'major work'. Lots of food for thought though. I'll be reading it again.

---

So now I'm reading some Wordsworth, to see, I guess, if he can give me some 'vital options' :D
 
Dirty Martini said:
I finished Why Read? by Mark Edmundson
Hmm. Interesting. You get that in town or by amazon/abebooks?

Seville booksearch disappointing. Only managed to get The Collected Stories of John Cheever. Decent enough so far...
 
Currently reading:

The Mind In The Cave (David Lewis-Williams)

The Forgiveness of Nature: the Story of Grass (Graham Harvey)

Another Country (James Baldwin)

The Land of Lettice Sweetapple: an English Countryside Explored (Peter Fowler & Ian Blackwell)

Stonehenge: Neolithic Man and the Cosmos (John North)

The Wounded Storyteller: Body, Illness, and Ethics (Arthur W. Frank)
 
story said:
Currently reading:

The Mind In The Cave (David Lewis-Williams)

The Forgiveness of Nature: the Story of Grass (Graham Harvey)

Another Country (James Baldwin)

The Land of Lettice Sweetapple: an English Countryside Explored (Peter Fowler & Ian Blackwell)

Stonehenge: Neolithic Man and the Cosmos (John North)

The Wounded Storyteller: Body, Illness, and Ethics (Arthur W. Frank)

all at once? :eek:
 
crustychick said:
all at once? :eek:


Aye... and also the New Scientist, which comes through the letterbox every week and gives me no rest

Foolish or what.

I'm reading a couple of Rock n Roll anthologies for light relief :D



ETA Actually they hang together rather well.

The Story of Grass is about the green sward and how it has formed history, been part of history, how pasture and livestock has formed society.

The Lettice Sweetapple book is about the history and archeology of the land in Wiltshire (a lot of it is pastureland).

The Stonehenge book is about how Neolithic peoples interacted with the land (amongst other things)

The Mind in the cave is a theory about how consciousness evolved in early humans... It makes me think about how the Land and the relationship with the Land has been a thread through the human mind from before self-consciousness, and how we are currently losing that connection to the Land.
 
Hunger by Knut Hamsen. I enjoyed Growth of the Soil, which was as plodding as it sounds, so thought I'd give it a go.

It's good so far though the foreword by Paul Auster (whose work I enjoy) is pretty impenetrable for a bear of very little brain like me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom