belboid
Exasperated, not angry.
because I am led to believe that Mr Faulks is in league with the devil. The pseudo-parallel with the miners strike really got on my tits.Brainaddict said:I can understand why you'd think it shit, but why evil?
because I am led to believe that Mr Faulks is in league with the devil. The pseudo-parallel with the miners strike really got on my tits.Brainaddict said:I can understand why you'd think it shit, but why evil?
Sorry but that sounds to me like the kind of plot that writes itself - no brainwork required - with a lot of manipulative sentimentality heaped in. I can see absolutely no point in reading stuff like that.MightyAphrodite said:The Notebook (again!!!)
From Publishers Weekly
In 1932, two North Carolina teenagers from opposite sides of the tracks fall in love. Spending one idyllic summer together in the small town of New Bern, Noah Calhoun and Allie Nelson do not meet again for 14 years. Noah has returned from WWII to restore the house of his dreams, having inherited a large sum of money. Allie, programmed by family and the "caste system of the South" to marry an ambitious, prosperous man, has become engaged to powerful attorney Lon Hammond. When she reads a newspaper story about Noah's restoration project, she shows up on his porch step, re-entering his life for two days. Will Allie leave Lon for Noah? The book's slim dimensions and cliche-ridden prose will make comparisons to The Bridges of Madison County inevitable. What renders Sparks's (Wokini: A Lakota Journey of Happiness and Self-Understanding) sentimental story somewhat distinctive are two chapters, which take place in a nursing home in the '90s, that frame the central story. The first sets the stage for the reading of the eponymous notebook, while the later one takes the characters into the land beyond happily ever after, a future rarely examined in books of this nature. Early on, Noah claims that theirs may be either a tragedy or a love story, depending on the perspective. Ultimately, the judgment is up to readers?be they cynics or romantics. For the latter, this will be a weeper.
tangerinedream said:Tom Stoppard - The real thing (a play)
It's about some hateful people, but it's clever enough not to be hateful. Quite enjoying it. First thing I've read of his since Rozencrantz and Guidenstein are dead.
the famous gardener in stoppard's 'arcadia' whch i realy wasn't fond of after reading it for my english degree, constable brown (no, that's wrong, sounds like a detective daytime series on living tv) designed the gardens for my old uni, bath spa...very lovely gardenstangerinedream said:finished this and was a bit disapointed, it didn't really seem to go anywhere - some great bits of dialogue though. I think i could read it again though. I suspect it might be better read, than actually produced, good be a stunning radio play with the right director and cast.
IntoStella said:Sorry but that sounds to me like the kind of plot that writes itself - no brainwork required - with a lot of manipulative sentimentality heaped in. I can see absolutely no point in reading stuff like that.
I wish I could bring myself to WRITE stuff like that, for then I would be a rich woman.
Dubversion said:and now i'm throwing myself excitedly into Not Fade Away by Jim Dodge cos it was a birthday present (and everybody else seems to be reading it too )...
Good book.TheLostProphet said:Terry Pratchett & Neil Gaiman, Good Omens
rubbershoes said:Cries Unheard - Gita Sereny
It made my eyes wetfoo said:Toast - Nigel Slater
a lovely book.
yr not meant to take the book orally, or things like that will happen.Orang Utan said:It made my eyes wet