This person, Ian R Crane is from the ''British 9/11 Truth Movement'', who beleive that there is a huge conspiracy and coverup regarding 9/11. From here they leap to the idea that there is a huge conspiracy regarding 7/7.
Here is their
site ( reluctant as I am to give them the traffic. They have recently tried to raise their profile by attacking me.)
I have been lambasted and pestered by them on my blog, and slagged off all over their website,
here they are discussing whether I am a team of M15 agents sent to discredit their important truth mission with my bothersome survivor story that surprisingly gets more attention than their oddball fact free insistence that 7/7 was a 'false flag psy-ops/black ops'.
The key basis for this claim is the issue of whether the 7/7 bombers caught a particular train or not. They are obsessed with this. Prole, another poster on u75 has also been on this site,
restricting all posts to 7/7 and this ''no suicide bombs'' theory..
Not content with pestering me on my blog and attacking me on various sites I frequent, they have now moved on to
hijacking and heckling the book tour of Milan Rai, a peace activist who has written a very good book about 7/7 and the Iraq war.
16 of them turned up to heckle and disrupt the launch in London where Milan and I were on a panel taking questions with a left wing historian and an Iraqi Professor.
They have followed the pattern of
disrupting the book tour all over the UK, presumably as a means of raising their profile and trying to recruit more ''converts''. They are evangelical about it, and very like religious fundementalists IMO. I have found them to be paranoid and unreasonable and aggressive: cyber bullies. I've had to kick them off my blog.
9/11 board said:
Good work gents, I hope the London crew put this piece of shit straight about things, seems to be 'willfully' ignorant like team rachil.
I beg those in London to hijack this fool's meeting and use it to disseminate what we know
another 9/11 person from Ian R Crane's group hijacking another date on Milan's book tour said:
...with sinking hearts, we realised that not only did was he talking from a very limited perspective indeed, but that he believed the media and official story!
Oh dear! Adrian was the first to interrupt with salient comments re 7/7 and 9/11 and this was met with no response from Milan, apart from a polite, yet firm request to refrain from speaking and that he would deal with the issues raised later on in the evening.
Milan's voice droned on and on and I found myself losing interest and wishing he would liven things up. This happened, but not in the way which I expected as Justin could not contain himself and he began to interject with increasing intensity - ignoring Milan's irritated requests to wait until it was his turn to speak. This turned into requests for Justin not to speak at all and that he would deal with all the issues he raised later on in the evening.
Mmmmm! The atmosphere was distinctly changing to one of the audience wanting to listen to Milan and not Justin and the organiser's partner who was sitting near me as I was on the end of the row, glared and asked in a despairing tone, "Why are you doing this?"
A few questions were asked by a couple of other members of the audience, but our group spoke the most and I bet Milan Rai wished we weren't there!! One question I asked was in connection with the altered photo of the alleged 4 'bombers' in the train station, which had obviously been digitally manipulated...(snip)
another person plotting disruption of the book tour said:
London 9/11 Truth seekers who will be attending Milan's meeting tonight - you must make sure he is not allowed to get away with his rubbish. He is a gatekeeper. He is either extremely stupid and naive or he is working to another agenda and for someone else. Likewise with Rachel.
I am pleased to say that we were accused by the organisers of wrecking their meeting - that is we heckled him everytime he made an outrageous remark or dismissed something which was of paramount importance. His tactics of stonewalling were straight out of Rachel's modus operandi. After Sinclair's opening detailed and excellent question about 7/7, I asked simply did he believe the official accounts of 7/7 and 9/11. He said he wouldn't answer those questions now but later on. We waited and waited and waited. His detailed diatribe that Blair attacking Iraq was the real reason why four young Muslims blew themselves up was unbelievably boring to listen to. He ignored totally Penny's question about the infamous doctored photograph of the 'bombers' at the station.
In the end, after a lot of 'improvements' by us to his presentation, he was cornered to reply to my question about 9/11 which he dismissed in one sentence by saying there was nothing at all that he could see that caused him to doubt the official story. Needless to say we let rip....
Engaging with them is what they want, as I have discovered. IMO they do not deserve the oxygen of publicity, as their MO is to harrass survivors and peace activists in order to posit a bizarre theory that there were no suicide bombs.
Therefore, I think telling this poster is a troll with an agenda...