ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
toggle said:
Unwarrented Censorship
- Thread starter ianrcrane
- Start date
dylanredefined
Not a house elf a tiger
So this thread started because someone sees an error in train times in someones book .So it all a conspricy ?
I never understand how 7/7 benefits the uk gov if they did it which i dont belive they did .
I never understand how 7/7 benefits the uk gov if they did it which i dont belive they did .
Badger Kitten
oof
@ Prole
Thanks for that.
No - you gave my job title, company and inferred that I had something to do with the article about Richmal.
As you already knew who I was, I contacted you with the hope that speaking to me in person might stop you and your felow posters from inferring that I was some kind of official plant.
Yes, you are very interested in July 7th and have been on my blog many times leaving bothersome comments, as well as writing about me on other forums with some unpleasant insinuations.
It is indeed unpleasant to be speculated about is it not? Fortunately, I did not say you were one of the people who have been calling and writing to my father. I know they post on the same boards as you, the British 9/11 Truth forum. I do not know their username.
I was heckled, though I am not sure if it was you who called out ' Rachel needs to get her facts straight!'.
And the sudden determination to discuss ''tactics'' with regard to attending and disrupting Milan's book launch tour now takes place in the ' private, non-public' area of the 9/11 forum, doesn't it? That is a new development. I don't know whether you have been contributing there or not. I take your word that yo have not been part of that, then.
I am sure you understand then why I have asked you and other conspiracy theorists to leave me alone.
Looks like 10 comments to me, but let's all stay safe, eh?
Cheers
Thanks for that.
No - you gave my job title, company and inferred that I had something to do with the article about Richmal.
As you already knew who I was, I contacted you with the hope that speaking to me in person might stop you and your felow posters from inferring that I was some kind of official plant.
Yes, you are very interested in July 7th and have been on my blog many times leaving bothersome comments, as well as writing about me on other forums with some unpleasant insinuations.
It is indeed unpleasant to be speculated about is it not? Fortunately, I did not say you were one of the people who have been calling and writing to my father. I know they post on the same boards as you, the British 9/11 Truth forum. I do not know their username.
I was heckled, though I am not sure if it was you who called out ' Rachel needs to get her facts straight!'.
And the sudden determination to discuss ''tactics'' with regard to attending and disrupting Milan's book launch tour now takes place in the ' private, non-public' area of the 9/11 forum, doesn't it? That is a new development. I don't know whether you have been contributing there or not. I take your word that yo have not been part of that, then.
I am sure you understand then why I have asked you and other conspiracy theorists to leave me alone.
Good. It is hard to tell if the anonymous comments are you, so I shall take your word that you have stopped leaving named or anonymous comments on my website as of now.
[/QUOTE]
Looks like 10 comments to me, but let's all stay safe, eh?
Cheers
ViolentPanda said:
Once again it would be nice to know what the fuck you're both on about?
Badger Kitten
oof
Badger Kitten
oof
They invited me to come by PM.
I was in the process of asking them to stop claiming I was a team of M15 agents at the time.
(This will make a good novel one day.
)
I was in the process of asking them to stop claiming I was a team of M15 agents at the time.
(This will make a good novel one day.
)Badger Kitten
oof
So I went along with another survivor from my train who'd also been getting mad messages on her blog, to see them, and David Shayler in action. After getting the PM, I called her and we jumped in a cab, eager to see who these loons were who'd been discussing us for months and leaving comments on my blog and in some cases, vaguely threeatening emails.
There were about 20 or fewer members of the British 9/11 Truth Movement, taking up about a third of an upstairs room at a pub. They were much older than I'd suspected, most of them in their late thirties or forties or fifties, mostly white, mostly middle class. Very sincere, clearly '' eccentric'', but it was as if I'd walked into some wierd church sect. When I mentioned to one that I wasn't convinced of the ''no suicide bombs/all a psy-ops false flag theory'' ( without saying who I was) he looked at me as if I had just spat in church, like an Fundementalist Evangelical being told Jesus was gay. He stalked off looking disgusted.
It is an article of faith with them, I now see, all this counter-official-rumour-conpiracy stuff. An inverted world view, through the looking glass.
So this odd meeting reassured me that they were harmless eccentrics. But then the Charles Clarke row with my dad about no 7/7 Public Enquiry meant my dad's name was in the press. Cue letters and calls to Dad, about me and 7/7 from conspuiracy theorists... (Dad's name is in the directory.)
It's completely mad, that's what it is. I've tried to engage with them. I 've tried to ask them why they come on my blog and try to convert me, argue with me, have huge discussions about me, I've tried to defend myself, I've got angry, laughed at them, ignored them. In a way it is fascinating: they are so obsessed with an event that is still very much on my mind, but they weren't there and they have such odd ideas about it all and they go on and on about it. But it is also annoying, and upsetting, and when it comes to vague threats and personal abuse, distressing. I hoped that by seeing me they'd realise I wasn't team of M15 agents and leave me alone. But it's made them worse than ever.
At least here they get roundly mocked. I'm not going to even bother defending myself against them any more and I have put comment moderator on my blog so they can't post. I don't read emails from them. I've been signed off work for a month so I don't know if they have been bothering my work number but fuck it, life is too short to worry about them anymore. I guess they'll piss off eventually, I know they are keen to get traffic and be talked about and that is why they come after anyone blogging about July 7.
It was a beautiful sunny day today. I'm having a beer, and I've got my chores done, and I'm thinking, life is too short to waste with fruitbats arguing about lunacy. Fuck 'em. Seeing them face to face was wierdly reassuring after allk the aggro, seeing them being expertly deflated over here on u75 cheers me up no end.
*burp*
Bollocks to it.
Bin.
Everyone must be completely
by now
There were about 20 or fewer members of the British 9/11 Truth Movement, taking up about a third of an upstairs room at a pub. They were much older than I'd suspected, most of them in their late thirties or forties or fifties, mostly white, mostly middle class. Very sincere, clearly '' eccentric'', but it was as if I'd walked into some wierd church sect. When I mentioned to one that I wasn't convinced of the ''no suicide bombs/all a psy-ops false flag theory'' ( without saying who I was) he looked at me as if I had just spat in church, like an Fundementalist Evangelical being told Jesus was gay. He stalked off looking disgusted.
It is an article of faith with them, I now see, all this counter-official-rumour-conpiracy stuff. An inverted world view, through the looking glass.
So this odd meeting reassured me that they were harmless eccentrics. But then the Charles Clarke row with my dad about no 7/7 Public Enquiry meant my dad's name was in the press. Cue letters and calls to Dad, about me and 7/7 from conspuiracy theorists... (Dad's name is in the directory.)
It's completely mad, that's what it is. I've tried to engage with them. I 've tried to ask them why they come on my blog and try to convert me, argue with me, have huge discussions about me, I've tried to defend myself, I've got angry, laughed at them, ignored them. In a way it is fascinating: they are so obsessed with an event that is still very much on my mind, but they weren't there and they have such odd ideas about it all and they go on and on about it. But it is also annoying, and upsetting, and when it comes to vague threats and personal abuse, distressing. I hoped that by seeing me they'd realise I wasn't team of M15 agents and leave me alone. But it's made them worse than ever.
At least here they get roundly mocked. I'm not going to even bother defending myself against them any more and I have put comment moderator on my blog so they can't post. I don't read emails from them. I've been signed off work for a month so I don't know if they have been bothering my work number but fuck it, life is too short to worry about them anymore. I guess they'll piss off eventually, I know they are keen to get traffic and be talked about and that is why they come after anyone blogging about July 7.
It was a beautiful sunny day today. I'm having a beer, and I've got my chores done, and I'm thinking, life is too short to waste with fruitbats arguing about lunacy. Fuck 'em. Seeing them face to face was wierdly reassuring after allk the aggro, seeing them being expertly deflated over here on u75 cheers me up no end.
*burp*
Bollocks to it.
Bin.
Everyone must be completely
by nowianrcrane, let's just cut to the chase:
When you signed up to u75 you were required to read the rules/faq: http://www.urban75.org/info/faq.html
Rule number 9:
As you can see, this thread is a direct violation of this rule. If you don't like the rules here then leave. If you continue to deliberately ignore the rules then you may well be banned.
End of discussion really.
When you signed up to u75 you were required to read the rules/faq: http://www.urban75.org/info/faq.html
Rule number 9:
As you can see, this thread is a direct violation of this rule. If you don't like the rules here then leave. If you continue to deliberately ignore the rules then you may well be banned.
End of discussion really.
toggle said:
I never comment on any thread without having read it first. Can you say the same?
toggle said:
You expect me to remember every thread I ever comment on? You seem to me to be shooting yourself in the head, mate.
toggle said:
Your unpleasantness is noted. Others will judge who is acting like a twat.
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
Lock&Light said:
toggle and I are sharing our amusement at just how pathetic you are.
There, NOW do you know "what the fuck we're on about", you pussilanimous pissant?
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
Lock&Light said:
Yep, it's you.
ViolentPanda said:
You demean yourself, VP.
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
Pass 'em on to the old bill. You'd do the same if it were ordinary religious nutters bothering you rather than these cultists.Badger Kitten said:
I think "article of faith" is about right, and the fact that they perceive their beliefs to be "anti-establishment" is merely the icing on a very pathetic cake.
Thing is, I don't think they will leave you alone unless you do something harsh (like passing any threats on to the police) because you're a threat to their belief system, your rationality undermines their faith, your existence as an individual person rather than a collective MI5 personality shows their "religion" up as the rather tawdry trainspotterism that it really is.So this odd meeting reassured me that they were harmless eccentrics. But then the Charles Clarke row with my dad about no 7/7 Public Enquiry meant my dad's name was in the press. Cue letters and calls to Dad, about me and 7/7 from conspuiracy theorists... (Dad's name is in the directory.)
It's completely mad, that's what it is. I've tried to engage with them. I 've tried to ask them why they come on my blog and try to convert me, argue with me, have huge discussions about me, I've tried to defend myself, I've got angry, laughed at them, ignored them. In a way it is fascinating: they are so obsessed with an event that is still very much on my mind, but they weren't there and they have such odd ideas about it all and they go on and on about it. But it is also annoying, and upsetting, and when it comes to vague threats and personal abuse, distressing. I hoped that by seeing me they'd realise I wasn't team of M15 agents and leave me alone. But it's made them worse than ever.
At least here they get roundly mocked. I'm not going to even bother defending myself against them any more and I have put comment moderator on my blog so they can't post. I don't read emails from them. I've been signed off work for a month so I don't know if they have been bothering my work number but fuck it, life is too short to worry about them anymore. I guess they'll piss off eventually, I know they are keen to get traffic and be talked about and that is why they come after anyone blogging about July 7.
It was a beautiful sunny day today. I'm having a beer, and I've got my chores done, and I'm thinking, life is too short to waste with fruitbats arguing about lunacy. Fuck 'em. Seeing them face to face was wierdly reassuring after allk the aggro, seeing them being expertly deflated over here on u75 cheers me up no end.
*burp*
Bollocks to it.
Bin.
Everyone must be completely
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
Lock&Light said:
Only in your eyes, and what you see is a matter of supreme disinterest to me.
ViolentPanda said:
I think you're wrong about that, but, what matter?
Such vitriol as you allow to gush out can only serve to demean.
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
You often think that others are wrong. Facts usually prove otherwise.Lock&Light said:
Vitriol?
Describing you as a pussilanimous pissant is a reasonably accurate summation if one is taking your unedifying contributions to this board as a measure, and not vitriolic in the least.
ViolentPanda said:
Pomposity demeans you as well.
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
toggle said:
How often does that happen, one in ten posts, one in twenty?
L&L's usual modus operandi isn't to comment on thead, but rather to comment on contributions, which when you think about it is more than a little ironic; he who contributes little commenting on the (perceived) failings of the contributions of others.
But hey, why am I telling you this? You already know it!
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
Lock&Light said:
So you're unable to discern proper use of the English language from pomposity, are you?
Why doesn't that surprise me?
toggle said:
I've already pointed out that this thread is one-sided. It's topic needs no extra illumination from me. The original posting on the other thread by the OP has been more than sufficiently torn to pieces by others.
Bernie Gunther
Fundamentalist Druid
Just noticed this. I appreciate your comment. A lot of what I was saying there was originally inspired by this article, which you might find interesting.Donna Ferentes said:
http://www.asc-cybernetics.org/2002/Lewin.htm