Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ)

hmm. I'm more inclined to think that the 'this affects poor people' is just a convenient argument for people who don't want to pay it for political reasons.
 
I disagree. They're are some of the people moaning but not because the £12.50 is going to make one iota of difference to their lifestyles. They're moaning because they are being told they have to pay it by someone they have broader political differences with. It's a plaything for them, not a serious lifestyle protest. That's coming from the poorer folk.

Not to mention he's got brown skin and is a Muslim...
 
I've said a few times before in this forum that I don't particularly care for Khan. He doesn't really have any new ideas and is doing his best to bland his way through to the next election.

But then I see the people who hate, no loathe him. And I think I really don't like those people very much. Thinly veiled racism, heck not-at-all veiled racism, and so on... So maybe I should support Khan just a bit, because I really don't like the idea of the people who hate him getting their way.
 
I've said a few times before in this forum that I don't particularly care for Khan. He doesn't really have any new ideas and is doing his best to bland his way through to the next election.


If we have to have politicians at all I'd prefer them to be be bland and not do too much, it's the fuckers who are always trying to change things (usually for the worse) to boost their ratings that piss me off.
 
I've said a few times before in this forum that I don't particularly care for Khan. He doesn't really have any new ideas and is doing his best to bland his way through to the next election.

But then I see the people who hate, no loathe him. And I think I really don't like those people very much. Thinly veiled racism, heck not-at-all veiled racism, and so on... So maybe I should support Khan just a bit, because I really don't like the idea of the people who hate him getting their way.
tbf, he's done more or less what he said he would on fares, and he has supported new council flat schemes. He is a bland centrist, but he's a massive step up from Johnson.

Without changing his position, he's moved from a long way to the right to slightly to the left of the Labour leadership. :(
 
All this talk of ''50-100k motors', surely in this day and age they'll be compliant anyway.

Are there any modern (made within 5 years) Ferraris, Lambos, Bentleys etc that don't
actually comply?
 
tbh I don't agree with the exemption for 40+ years-old cars. People who run very old cars for a hobby really should be getting themselves a different hobby. Sorry, tough shit.
Not really a hobby, in my case I drive a car I like which I owned before ULEZ. I'll leave the soul-less modern cars for other people

Thanks for telling me what do.👍 Appreciate it.

It's exempt, so sorry tough shit.
 
Not really a hobby, in my case I drive a car I like which I owned before ULEZ. I'll leave the soul-less modern cars for other people

Thanks for telling me what do.👍 Appreciate it.

It's exempt, so sorry tough shit.
Well done for totally missing the point. You don't just get to drive whatever you like whenever you like for nothing. None of us does. Other people exist as well as you.
 
All this talk of ''50-100k motors', surely in this day and age they'll be compliant anyway.

Are there any modern (made within 5 years) Ferraris, Lambos, Bentleys etc that don't
actually comply?
By law, no. Nothing sold after September 2015 will be non-compliant. I'm pretty sure the vast majority of those cars won't be diesel either, so 20 year old ones should also be compliant.
 
Well done for totally missing the point. You don't just get to drive whatever you like whenever you like for nothing. None of us does. Other people exist as well as you.
What point?

My car is exempt, you don't like it, write to TfL.

I do drive whatever I like, whenever I like. :confused:

Who is stopping me?
 
Good. Leading the way for once. :)

It is clear that ULEZ is unpopular with certain outer-London types in places like Uxbridge, who mostly vote tory anyway. But I'd be surprised if a solid majority of Londoners don't support it.
pretty unpopular in Hounslow

very labour part of London

think it all the fucking planes going over ever 40 seconds :hmm:
 
I've said a few times before in this forum that I don't particularly care for Khan. He doesn't really have any new ideas and is doing his best to bland his way through to the next election.

But then I see the people who hate, no loathe him. And I think I really don't like those people very much. Thinly veiled racism, heck not-at-all veiled racism, and so on... So maybe I should support Khan just a bit, because I really don't like the idea of the people who hate him getting their way.

And if you're indifferent to Sadiq Khan but you hate the idea of kids growing up with breathable air because boohoo my car, you can probably fuck off as well. Oh I didn't know when I bought this shitty old diesel last year that I would be banned from driving it. Maybe not, but you knew it was a shitty old diesel and you still bought it so, when you get right down to it, fuck you anyway.
 
And if you're indifferent to Sadiq Khan but you hate the idea of kids growing up with breathable air because boohoo my car, you can probably fuck off as well. Oh I didn't know when I bought this shitty old diesel last year that I would be banned from driving it. Maybe not, but you knew it was a shitty old diesel and you still bought it so, when you get right down to it, fuck you anyway.
I used to think that myself, because I tend to do research before I buy something as expensive as a car. (I'm pretty much of the belief that there's no reason on Earth why someone who does under 30k miles a year should buy a diesel) But I've now run into enough people to know that just because you're spending £10k+ on something, it doesn't mean that some people will do a shred of investigation into it. A lot of people bought them partly out of sheer ignorance, and partly because the government themselves used to promote them as "greener". And I had a real, manifest hatred for them when they were doing that, because I knew it was swapping one type of pollution that might kill you 30 years down the road for one that will kill you right now. Fuckers trying to meet their CO2 commitments by strangling all the kids that dare to live near a busy road instead of doing something to promote less fucking driving.
 
It's the cost of the fine for not paying the charge. In Paris, for example, you buy Crit'Air sticker for about a fiver and you're ok to drive.

If you don't pay the charge in London the fine is £180, so you're not comparing like with like.
No, it depends on the type of vehicle you have and if it doesn’t meet the requirements that’s the cost of bringing it in, so it is like with like.

 
I'm all in favour of pay per mile road charging.. would seem to be the longer term solution to excessive road use and congestion.

I would imagine eventually it could be made quite sophisticted so the charge depends on the type of vehicle your driving, the road your driving on and how far your drivivng. Would reduce taffic on main roads and so on minor as well...
 
I’m not adverse to ULEZ, and do appreciate that cleaner air is better, but being priced out of going into London by both public transport and now vehicle is very annoying.


luckily my work is 100m short of the zone, otherwise I’d have had to change base. My partners dad is however in the zone, so I won’t be driving to see him any longer.
 
Back
Top Bottom