Oddball
New Member
The way I read that statistic was people rejected at the border. I may have been wrong.Yes, because a lot of people decided to apply for a Visa and didn't even get that far.
Know of someone turned back at airport with old (but quite serious conviction).What evidence of this is there? How are they carrying out these 'random checks' given they don't have access to the PNC?
There's also comments on this very thread by people that have been questioned and bollocked about previous convictions (but ultimately let through).
They do have access - through interpol.
I know the plural of anecdote is not data but based on this it's clear they do (very) occasionally check (via Interpol).
Read it in an article a while back about reciprocal agreements. Mostly to do with how the US made more demands of us than they were prepared to give. The actual specifics of PNC access was hidden until someone made the effort to make a FOI request. If the situation changes it will stay hidden until someone else does another FOI.Evidence?
It's not an absolute given just statistically very small.It is an absolute given you'll get through if you tick no. It really isn't if anyone follows your idiotic advice. You do appear to be the first person to come along in years with 'honesty is really the best policy' advice so I commend you for that.
It's far from idiotic, to paraphrase what I was saying : if the consequences of being denied entry are dire, and you think you'll get through the interview, then you should seriously consider going Visa.
Like I said, if you're not arsed go for it. Statistically you won't have a drama.