chieftain
Mega Gammon
Back to Channel 5 on a Thursday next year.
A Liverpool supporting mate of mine suggested this to me last night. Yeah I thought, along with Liverpool themselves!
Back to Channel 5 on a Thursday next year.
A Liverpool supporting mate of mine suggested this to me last night. Yeah I thought, along with Liverpool themselves!
Felt like we were among the big boys last night. The pub was three times as busy as for the last round, big stadium, big players . . . intersting experience.
. .
What strategies working then? Is 125 million in the red worth it for a couple of euro cup games?
Unban's fav internet accountant!1! As said a thousand times 'spend' means nothing at all, except on Internet forums.LOL your net spend on players has been 125 million loss whilst ours has been 25 million in the black over the past five(ish) years.
Unban's fav internet accountant!1! As said a thousand times 'spend' means nothing at all, except on Internet forums.
According to 'spend' Bale is a £10 million liability, Lennon a £1 million liability, Modric a £16 million liability. What they are also is a £100 million asset. etc, etc, etc.
The next thing to consider is the return on the asset - as in did the asset contribute to the club attracting CL receipts: what is the ROI on that investment?
But maybe you should stick to your gibbering LOL, it's probably a lot more comforting.
Thrifty spurs are very thirfty.
Spending is a combination of net transfer fees, wages and depreciation in asset value as contacts run down (amortisation). We (Spurs) lay out a lot in transfer fees, recoup plenty through sales, are within our means on wages (relative to turnover with or without Champions League next season) and keep the majority of our better players tied to long term contracts. Not exactly thrifty but our "spending" is absolutely dwarfed by the now traditional top 4 and Man City, yet here we are challenging to get back in Europe's elite competition; not bad huh?
4-0 Wednesday, Gomes the hero in a penalty shootout. Cardiac wards packed to the rafters across North London.
So, Liverpool played very well last night (dont you think?).
Seeing as Joel got sacked for finishing 5th for two season's, do you think 'ol twitchy will survive if he drops a place (or two) by the end of this season ?
They did, Citeh didn't.
You mean big Martin Jol?
What makes you think we'll drop a place or two? We've got some tuff games to play which we're more then capable of winning... Starting with your lot!
Fwiw, I posted - with evidence - on your own thread that in 2009/10 the goon wage bill was £120 million and Tottenham's was £60 million.From a year or so back. Untold Arsenal
Their wage bill is roughly 60% of ours, £60.4 million against our £104 million, though their wages are higher as a percentage of turnover at 53.5% (we stand at 46.2%). Both of those percentages are well within recommended limits of 60%, and Spurs are very healthy at the operating level, with profits reported for the last five years totalling over £104 million against our £142million.
http://blog.emiratesstadium.info/archives/6234
So the percentage spend on players is higher with you in regards turnover. At least it was a year ago.