Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Top 4 thread: Tottenham 2010/11

A Liverpool supporting mate of mine suggested this to me last night. Yeah I thought, along with Liverpool themselves!

If we're fucking lucky. Brum's got one of those spots haven't they, after winning the FA Cup? Meaning only 5th placed go to EL. More than likely that'll be you lot.
 
brum get one for winning the league cup, and assuming man city finish in the top 4, another uefa spot will go to bolton or stoke for being fa cup winners/runners up
 
Enjoying every moment, not expecting it to be repeated.

It's all a fine achievement. If Tottenham had double the wage bill - as the goons do (£60 million vs. £120 million) - we'd expect more from it. Like cups, even.
 
LOL your net spend on players has been 125 million loss whilst ours has been 25 million in the black over the past five(ish) years.

What strategies working then? Is 125 million in the red worth it for a couple of euro cup games?
 
LOL your net spend on players has been 125 million loss whilst ours has been 25 million in the black over the past five(ish) years.
Unban's fav internet accountant!1! As said a thousand times 'spend' means nothing at all, except on Internet forums.

According to 'spend' Bale is a £10 million liability, Lennon a £1 million liability, Modric a £16 million liability. What they are also is a £100 million asset. etc, etc, etc.

The next thing to consider is the return on the asset - as in did the asset contribute to the club attracting CL receipts: what is the ROI on that investment?

But maybe you should stick to your gibbering LOL, it's probably a lot more comforting.
 
London Calling.
I REALLY hope you sell Modric AND Bale to actually cash in on that investment. (ha ha ha!) .When you do I'd love to see who you replace with them and then what position you end up in the league.

You can rant on about some accounting bollox as much as you want the bottom line is you'll never reach that amount for them as they are essential for your long term future and therefore it would be be suicidal to sell them.
 
Unban's fav internet accountant!1! As said a thousand times 'spend' means nothing at all, except on Internet forums.

According to 'spend' Bale is a £10 million liability, Lennon a £1 million liability, Modric a £16 million liability. What they are also is a £100 million asset. etc, etc, etc.

The next thing to consider is the return on the asset - as in did the asset contribute to the club attracting CL receipts: what is the ROI on that investment?

But maybe you should stick to your gibbering LOL, it's probably a lot more comforting.

so how is fabregas etc not a 65k a week asset? That helps generate champions league income and merchazndise sales, blah blah blazzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

I love you having a go at me and irobot for being internet accountants and then well being an accountant on the internet.

Thrifty spurs are very thirfty.

dave
 
Thrifty spurs are very thirfty.

Spending is a combination of net transfer fees, wages and depreciation in asset value as contacts run down (amortisation). We (Spurs) lay out a lot in transfer fees, recoup plenty through sales, are within our means on wages (relative to turnover with or without Champions League next season) and keep the majority of our better players tied to long term contracts. Not exactly thrifty but our "spending" is absolutely dwarfed by the now traditional top 4 and Man City, yet here we are challenging to get back in Europe's elite competition; not bad huh?


4-0 Wednesday, Gomes the hero in a penalty shootout. Cardiac wards packed to the rafters across North London.
 
Spending is a combination of net transfer fees, wages and depreciation in asset value as contacts run down (amortisation). We (Spurs) lay out a lot in transfer fees, recoup plenty through sales, are within our means on wages (relative to turnover with or without Champions League next season) and keep the majority of our better players tied to long term contracts. Not exactly thrifty but our "spending" is absolutely dwarfed by the now traditional top 4 and Man City, yet here we are challenging to get back in Europe's elite competition; not bad huh?


4-0 Wednesday, Gomes the hero in a penalty shootout. Cardiac wards packed to the rafters across North London.

From a year or so back. Untold Arsenal

Their wage bill is roughly 60% of ours, £60.4 million against our £104 million, though their wages are higher as a percentage of turnover at 53.5% (we stand at 46.2%). Both of those percentages are well within recommended limits of 60%, and Spurs are very healthy at the operating level, with profits reported for the last five years totalling over £104 million against our £142million.


http://blog.emiratesstadium.info/archives/6234

So the percentage spend on players is higher with you in regards turnover. At least it was a year ago.
 
So, Liverpool played very well last night (dont you think?).

Seeing as Joel got sacked for finishing 5th for two season's, do you think 'ol twitchy will survive if he drops a place (or two) by the end of this season ?
 
So, Liverpool played very well last night (dont you think?).

They did, Citeh didn't.

Seeing as Joel got sacked for finishing 5th for two season's, do you think 'ol twitchy will survive if he drops a place (or two) by the end of this season ?

You mean big Martin Jol?

What makes you think we'll drop a place or two? We've got some tuff games to play which we're more then capable of winning... Starting with your lot!
 
They did, Citeh didn't.



You mean big Martin Jol?

What makes you think we'll drop a place or two? We've got some tuff games to play which we're more then capable of winning... Starting with your lot!

The typo/miss spelling was for Corex.

I'm sure you'll give it your best.
 
From a year or so back. Untold Arsenal

Their wage bill is roughly 60% of ours, £60.4 million against our £104 million, though their wages are higher as a percentage of turnover at 53.5% (we stand at 46.2%). Both of those percentages are well within recommended limits of 60%, and Spurs are very healthy at the operating level, with profits reported for the last five years totalling over £104 million against our £142million.

http://blog.emiratesstadium.info/archives/6234

So the percentage spend on players is higher with you in regards turnover. At least it was a year ago.
Fwiw, I posted - with evidence - on your own thread that in 2009/10 the goon wage bill was £120 million and Tottenham's was £60 million.

The very obvious thing about wages is it's largely money pissed up the wall - £60 million a more per season than Tottenham.

The very obvious thing about buying and selling players is they are an investment which, as the advert says, may go up or down. Sometimes very up, as with Bale, Lennon, Modric, THudd, VdV, etc.

Yield/ROI is a complicated combination of both measured against income generated.
 
So how will this play out tonight?

Lennon and Bale shred them to pieces, Crouch makes amends, and we're 2 up after 10 minutes?

The crowd are even more mental than on Sol Cambell's return, Madrid don't know what day it is and Mourinho's brain is swimming?

The third goes in just after the break - a lovely Bale free kick into the top corner - and the place goes bersek - the demented men in white develop almost supernatural abilities and . . . .
 
You lose either way! Nah, I think you might actually eke out a win, or at least a draw. Either way I don't see how you're gonna pull something so massively miraculous as a 4-0 win out of your tight asses.
 
Back
Top Bottom