souljacker
innit
Which Android phones that use USB-C chargers don't work with, err, USB-C chargers then?
That's not what you said.
Which Android phones that use USB-C chargers don't work with, err, USB-C chargers then?
I thought it was pretty clear: Android phones and Chromebooks have been all chargeable by the same USB-C cable for years.That's not what you said.
I thought it was pretty clear: Android phones and Chromebooks have been all chargeable by the same USB-C cable for years.
But to make it crystal clear for pedants: USB-C equipped Android phones and USB-C equipped Chromebooks have been all chargeable by the same USB-C cable for years.
There.
All Android phones? My last Android phone definitely wasn't on USB-C.Err, Android phones and Chromebooks have been all chargeable by the same USB-C cable for years. Apple should be learning from them, not the other way around.
Post #62.All Android phones? My last Android phone definitely wasn't on USB-C.
That kind of demonstrates how it's failing as a standard though.I think you are overthinking it. Just get a USB-A to USB-C cable that says it's usb3. Unless you REALLY need to transfer at 20Gbps you probably won't notice the 10Gbps difference. Your internal hard drive won't be able to keep up anyway. SATA is 3gbps or something.
Edit: In fact, that cable that is being supplied with the drive is non-standard anyway. USB-A to USB-A is strongly discouraged because people end up connecting two powered devices to each other and fry them both.
All of this.I think you are overthinking it. Just get a USB-A to USB-C cable that says it's usb3. Unless you REALLY need to transfer at 20Gbps you probably won't notice the 10Gbps difference. Your internal hard drive won't be able to keep up anyway. SATA is 3gbps or something.
Edit: In fact, that cable that is being supplied with the drive is non-standard anyway. USB-A to USB-A is strongly discouraged because people end up connecting two powered devices to each other and fry them both.
That kind of demonstrates how it's failing as a standard though.
And yeah I might be overthinking it...but how is one to know? Anyone who's ended up with slightly the wrong cable or adapter knows the danger of underthinking. A consistent, clear standard should help to make the level of thinking required, clear.
The speed could be relevant by the way as the internal drive in my new Mac can do 5-10gbps. So the difference between the 5gbps and 10 Gbps USB versions could potentially be worth being aware of.
It's one of the new M1 ones. I don't think anyone actually knows what it is! But appears that read and writes speeds are potentially pretty fast. I don't know...all a bit beyond my expertise.I thought Macs used SATA3? Either way, it won't be reading and writing at that speed (I don't think so anyway).
I bought the same enclosure you linked to on Amazon for an XBox a couple of weeks ago. Ignore those stated speeds, they're hypothetical. You'll never see those speeds in the real world, or anything even close to them. The fastest you'll ever see is about 560/530 MB/s read/write, as that's as fast as the SSD can read/write.That kind of demonstrates how it's failing as a standard though.
And yeah I might be overthinking it...but how is one to know? Anyone who's ended up with slightly the wrong cable or adapter knows the danger of underthinking. A consistent, clear standard should help to make the level of thinking required, clear.
The speed could be relevant by the way as the internal drive in my new Mac can do 5-10gbps. So the difference between the 5gbps and 10 Gbps USB versions could potentially be worth being aware of.
Edit: In fact, that cable that is being supplied with the drive is non-standard anyway. USB-A to USB-A is strongly discouraged because people end up connecting two powered devices to each other and fry them both.
Sure, but there are other enclosures, which can take faster SSDs, and in those cases it might become relevant.I bought the same enclosure you linked to on Amazon for an XBox a couple of weeks ago. Ignore those stated speeds, they're hypothetical. You'll never see those speeds in the real world, or anything even close to them. The fastest you'll ever see is about 560/530 MB/s read/write, as that's as fast as the SSD can read/write.
One example: Connecting an Android streaming box to the PC to flash new firmware, and you're switching back and forth between USB power and power from the mains adapter.examples? I've always used USB-A to connect stuff and have never done that.
examples? I've always used USB-A to connect stuff and have never done that.
Do you have an example of an SSD that can read/write faster than 5Gb/s?Sure, but there are other enclosures, which can take faster SSDs, and in those cases it might become relevant.
Eg this one claims around 2,500 MB/s which is 20Gb/s unless I have messed up my conversions.Do you have an example of an SSD that can read/write faster than 5Gb/s?
Indeed, but I thought we were discussing SATA SSDs, as that's what you linked to on Amazon?Eg this one claims around 2,500 MB/s which is 20Gb/s unless I have messed up my conversions.
Samsung Portable SSD X5 | Specs & Features | Samsung Semiconductor Global
Portable SSD X5 delivers fast speeds and safeguards data. It has a 2TB capacity and the fastest bandwidth up to 40Gb/s that brings speed and performance.www.samsung.com
Or this, which would have to go in an enclosure, claims 2000MB/s
Intel 665p 1TB M.2 PCIe NVMe 3D NAND SSD/Solid State Drive
Buy from Scan - 1TB Intel 665p Series, M.2 (2280) PCIe 3.0 (x4) NVMe SSD, QLC 3D3 NAND, 2000MB/s Read, 1925MB/s Write, 160k/250kwww.scan.co.uk
Funnily enough just the other week I dropped off my usb-c charger to someone in hospital and it failed to charge their phone. Turned out to be an incompatibility with 2 manufacturers fast charge system - so tbf a deviation from the standard - but still confusing as they were both just usb-c and I just expected then to work.Which Android phones that use USB-C chargers don't work with, err, USB-C chargers then?
You thought wrong. I presented that as a "semi random example" to demonstrate potential for cable confusion.Indeed, but I thought we were discussing SATA SSDs, as that's what you linked to on Amazon?
Where's the confusion? It's a type A to type A USB 3.0 cable. It'll work on any type A to type A USB 3.x setup. The attainable speed will depend on the connected devices.You thought wrong. I presented that as a "semi random example" to demonstrate potential for cable confusion.
As I already explained, I would need to connect it to a type C port. Also as already explained, I might need to connect it via a dock or hub. Also as already explained, I might want to consider a faster SSD in which case the variety of USB3.x might become relevant to whether or not I could actually take advantage of that extra speed.Where's the confusion? It's a type A to type A USB 3.0 cable. It'll work on any type A to type A USB 3.x setup. The attainable speed will depend on the connected devices.
So you get your top spec cable with it or if you need a replacement you can buy one to the published spec. But you can also use one of many other not quite compatible cables that you probably have laying around or easy to borrow or available from Poundland that'll still work - just with slightly degraded performance. Seems better than a cable that doesn't work at all to me.As I already explained, I would need to connect it to a type C port. Also as already explained, I might need to connect it via a dock or hub. Also as already explained, I might want to consider a faster SSD in which case the variety of USB3.x might become relevant to whether or not I could actually take advantage of that extra speed.
If you want speeds greater than 10Gb/s, you'll need a type C cable and a peripheral that utilises USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 or faster. It isn't rocket science.As I already explained, I would need to connect it to a type C port. Also as already explained, I might need to connect it via a dock or hub. Also as already explained, I might want to consider a faster SSD in which case the variety of USB3.x might become relevant to whether or not I could actually take advantage of that extra speed.
Fair enough, we shouldn't complain that the USB standard has become very confused, because the only alternative is something that doesn't work at all.So you get your top spec cable with it or if you need a replacement you can buy one to the published spec. But you can also use one of many other not quite compatible cables that you probably have laying around or easy to borrow or available from Poundland that'll still work - just with slightly degraded performance. Seems better than a cable that doesn't work at all to me.
I didn't say it was rocket science.If you want speeds greater than 10Gb/s, you'll need a type C cable and a peripheral that utilises USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 or faster. It isn't rocket science.
It's for an Apple laptop. Buy a Thunderbolt 3 cable. If you need the cable to be longer than 0.5m and still want to achieve the theoretical 40Gb/s speeds, you'll need an active cable of 2m or less.I didn't say it was rocket science.
I said it was confusing.
And there's more than one type of "type C cable" so that is an insufficient specification.
Nope, I'm just trying to explain it in the simplest terms possible to someone who seems to be having a problem understanding.One minute you're saying a "type C cable" (no such thing) then the next you've changed your mind to a "thunderbolt 3 cable". You're as confused as everyone else.