Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Tuts make dubious allegations after Brixton Windmill gig

Status
Not open for further replies.
you might have a point if some hours previously nadia had in fact been the victim of an assault and of racially-aggravated public order offences. but she wasn't. and this has over the past 30-odd pages become apparent.

I've gone from thinking perhaps you were making a rather subtle point I wasn't getting, to realising that you are actually just quite thick.
 
I've gone from thinking perhaps you were making a rather subtle point I wasn't getting, to realising that you are actually just quite thick.
let's put it this way. the incident was over some hours before this thread started. by page 2 some people were calling it correctly, although others wanted more information. when this was forthcoming pretty much everyone agreed with the first people, like blagsta, who made their conclusions known. after a further 1000 posts some cunt turns up and starts saying how off it is that some people made their minds up early in the thread when there was still the chance that nadia was the victim. but that's a load of bollocks, because a) you were too late to have any impact on the debate, instead showing anyone who cares to read the thread what a fuckwitted shitferbrains cunt you are, and b) there was NO CHANCE that this thread or any discussion anywhere would alter the facts of the incident at the windmill.

i too thought at first you were making a rather subtle point. but you're not, you're just, in the words of the smiths, a flatulent pain in the arse.
 
(@C66) Frankly, I'm surprised by the level of interest I've provoked with a basically sincere post. I might be the one who stuck my electric dick up this corpses arse, but it's you guys who've been holding it up as it lurched down the corridor.
 
Why today? Why make your grand entrance to urban on this mid July eve rather than any of the other evenings of the last ten years that you've said the sum total of fuck all?
he hasn't said anything of great interest this evening beyond having a pop at people who'd worked things out early in the thread, and making himself look like something of a tosser.
 
let's put it this way. the incident was over some hours before this thread started. by page 2 some people were calling it correctly, although others wanted more information. when this was forthcoming pretty much everyone agreed with the first people, like blagsta, who made their conclusions known. after a further 1000 posts some cunt turns up and starts saying how off it is that some people made their minds up early in the thread when there was still the chance that nadia was the victim. but that's a load of bollocks, because a) you were too late to have any impact on the debate, instead showing anyone who cares to read the thread what a fuckwitted shitferbrains cunt you are, and b) there was NO CHANCE that this thread or any discussion anywhere would alter the facts of the incident at the windmill.

i too thought at first you were making a rather subtle point. but you're not, you're just, in the words of the smiths, a flatulent pain in the arse.

The thing you're doing, which is sort of cute but also a bit scary, is to attach merit to the fact of having turned out to be right, regardless of the process gone through to reach whatever position at the time. You clearly think Blagsta made a brilliant deduction. I think he was blindly sticking up for someone. There you go.
 
he hasn't said anything of great interest this evening beyond having a pop at people who'd worked things out early in the thread, and making himself look like something of a tosser.

It's more the splash from the diving board. Or perhaps his (and it is a he) other 3000 posts have done the same sporadically over the years. Perhaps he has an entire misogyny-fighting history there waiting to be discovered. I'm off to bed. I'll leave it to someone who has time and can be arsed to check the details.
 
The thing you're doing, which is sort of cute but also a bit scary, is to attach merit to the fact of having turned out to be right, regardless of the process gone through to reach whatever position at the time. You clearly think Blagsta made a brilliant deduction. I think he was blindly sticking up for someone. There you go.
think what you will, but please don't inflict it on us again
 
Why today? Why make your grand entrance to urban on this mid July eve rather than any of the other evenings of the last ten years that you've said the sum total of fuck all?

It reflects well on you that you haven't bothered to actually look at when I last posted, but actually, it can't have been more than a few days ago. The number of replies that my original and subsequent posts on this thread have generated isn't something in my control; I suppose if all my - mostly fairly obscure and conversation-unfriendly - posts on here generated as many responses, I might have as any posts to my name as you do.
 
Well, Brixton Hatter said 'if you feel that strongly about it', which is a pretty shocking down-playing of an alleged racist assault.
Bollocks. I was reserving judgement before hearing the full story. I think you'll find I urged the Tuts to make a statement to the police. Stop stirring shit mate.....you're a week late to the discussion anyway. We've already done all this. :)
 
I can't say impressed with the way slowjoe has been treated here. He's entitled to his opinions - even if they do arrive a little late to the party - but all the sockpuppet accusations and linking to unrelated threads isn't on, really.
 
I can't say impressed with the way slowjoe has been treated here. He's entitled to his opinions - even if they do arrive a little late to the party - but all the sockpuppet accusations and linking to unrelated threads isn't on, really.

You're not proper urbans until you've been accused of being a sockpuppet/firky. He's finally made the grade.
 
I can't say impressed with the way slowjoe has been treated here. He's entitled to his opinions - even if they do arrive a little late to the party - but all the sockpuppet accusations and linking to unrelated threads isn't on, really.
Bollocks. He's thrown around baseless accusations of misogyny and generally behaved like a cunt.
 
If you'd given your reasons on page 2, you might not have come across as badly as you did.

I've made my point, and unless you have anything further to add ('you owe me an apology' again, maybe?), I'll leave you to learn from, or remain oblivious to your mistake, as you choose.
Where did this slug emerge from?
 
The time for this meta discussion has long passed and now only serves to open wounds.

Fair enough - and if this had been the character of responses to my first post, I don't think there's much more I could have said. But a few people in one breath said 'this is ancient history', and in the next wanted to have it out over the details. You'll have to forgive me if in those circumstances, the protestations of it all being in the past seemed more like a prop for weak arguments than a genuine entreaty to let it lie.
 
I can't say impressed with the way slowjoe has been treated here. He's entitled to his opinions - even if they do arrive a little late to the party - but all the sockpuppet accusations and linking to unrelated threads isn't on, really.

Two mentions of him being a sock puppet and one link to another thread. It's hardly reasonable to make a sweeping statement about slowjoe's treatment on this thread from three posts.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom