gaijingirl
Well-Known Member
Duke of Edinburgh suffered that back in the day iirc. Went from being a late night festival in a pub garden to everyone coming back inside
Same with the Railway in Tulse Hill
Duke of Edinburgh suffered that back in the day iirc. Went from being a late night festival in a pub garden to everyone coming back inside
I think the issue here is people moving into a particular area, knowing what the area is like, and then complaining about what the area's like. If you've lived on a quiet street for 20 years and then someone opens up a pub/venue behind your gaff & it's blaring out music at all hours of the night, then yes absolutely, complain away, I would too.How dare residents backing on to the Duke of Edinburgh not put up with a late night festival in the garden?
Duke of Edinburgh suffered that back in the day iirc. Went from being a late night festival in a pub garden to everyone coming back inside
He really didn't like you swearing within his hearing. He once told us we would have to leave if we continued talking in that manner, and we weren't really effing and blinding that much.Fergal at the Trinity really was pretty quiet.
That does not surprise me!He really didn't like you swearing within his hearing. He once told us we would have to leave if we continued talking in that manner, and we weren't really effing and blinding that much.
Good grief. What has happened to the place. From regular boozer to a wannbe hipster joint spouting crap like:
Trinity Arms Brixton
Fergal at the Trinity really was pretty quiet. Complaints were often about people talking and laughing too loudly outside.
The DofE totally over did it though. Just kept pushing the boundaries to see what they could get away with. Tremendous fun if you were at the party (as I sometimes was) but ridiculously inconsiderate towards people backing on to the garden. The idea that the various occupants of the numerous adjacent family houses had been mythical "old school Brixton" clones who by definition all welcomed, or even happily tolerated their families being subjected to the pub's increasing noise levels and amplification would benefit from some backing up.
When was this?I had friends who happily lived in the street
Opposite for years and had no problems with the DOE, but they did then start taking the piss. There didn't seem to be any noise management towards the end
What time period are you talking about for your "newly arrived whining, entitled fucking wankers?"When was this?
Not really interested in engaging with you, especially seeing as you failed to answer my earlier question on the topic.What time period are you talking about for your "newly arrived whining, entitled fucking wankers?"
Not really interested in engaging with you, especially seeing as you failed to answer my earlier question on the topic.
When was this?
That was maybe just before pubs got 24 hour licenses in November 2005? In August 2005 The Duke went for their 24 hour application. I knew the caretaker of the Mews houses from drinking in the Canterbury and of course living nearby.Roughly 12 years ago - give or take a year or so..
Have they got rid of the racist figurines above the bar at least?
There is a slight difference in that social housing tenants generally have very little say in where they get housed, so shunting a ton of families right next to a busy pub wouldn't be fair on either party.The issue of noise obviously is not always as simple as 'which came first, the pub or the housing'. As this thread and others over the years appear to suggest, circumstances can change and a venue that had previously produced acceptable levels of noise might develop into generating excessive levels.
The issue of housing could also potentially provide an interesting new angle. Admittedly most of the new developments near existing pubs have been private sale with little or no affordable housing. But if a block of mainly or wholly social housing were to be built next to an existing pub, and the new arrivals were to complain about the noise levels they were enduring, would it still be right to tell them to put up and shut up?
Used to go the Trinity a lot back in the late 80s and through the 90s. Not so much in more recent times. Realised the place had taken a turn for the worse a couple of years ago. Was in there one Saturday afternoon, and one of the bright young things who sat down to share the table out in the garden asked me if i knew who'd won the boat race...
Glad you agree then, given what you've been told on this thread, that it wasn't "some newly arrived whining, entitled fucking wankers" who protested the Dukes festival atmosphere.If the volume subsequently rises or the hours are extended, then of course they have a point.
Never liked the Trinity even before the recent refurb. Too Cla'am. Too rugger shirt."... a pub that's been lively for years". That was never the Trinity Arms. Fergal liked a quiet pub. It was only ever Young's, the brewery, that wanted extended hours and all the other changes. That's why he went back to Ireland. Since then the pub has changed, not much to my liking to be honest. But then there's not a lot of money to be made by running a pub for just a handful of old geezers contemplating their pints. So I'd rather have the Trinity even as it is, rather than no pub at all.
So the history is that it's the pub that's changed and it's all the local residents, of which I am one for over 30 years, that have tried to keep the noise and disturbance as it was.
Well, I think there's some leeway in the definition of 'local' when there better boozers very close by!You don't get to choose your local. It's just, well, local.