dirtysanta
Original Casual
Well ? There seems to be some evidence to suggest that NASA faked it?
take for example the actual man on the moon wearing a space suit of equal weight to him should have been able to jump six feet off the ground. However footage studied showed they never moved more than about 18".
How were they able to develop film that should of, by rights, been rendered usless by the the extreme radiation.The astronauts took thousands of pictures, each one perfectly exposed and sharply focused. Not one was badly composed or even blurred.The pictures are so perfect each one would have taken a slick advertising agency hours to put them together. But the astronauts managed it repeatedly.
The US government needed a postitve distraction from the Vietnam war.
A bit of film that shows the american flag fluttering must be false as there is no atmosphere or wind on the moon.
Outer space is awash with deadly radiation that emanates from solar flares firing out from the sun. Standard astronauts orbiting earth in near space, like those who recently fixed the Hubble telescope, are protected by the earth's Van Allen belt. But the Moon is to 240,000 miles distant, way outside this safe band. And, during the Apollo flights, astronomical data shows there were no less than 1,485 such flares. a physicist who works for NASA, once said shielding at least two meters thick would be needed. Yet the walls of the Lunar Landers which took astronauts from the spaceship to the moons surface were, said NASA, about the thickness of heavy duty aluminum foil.
How could that stop this deadly radiation? And if the astronauts were protected by their space suits, why didn't rescue workers use such protective gear at the Chernobyl meltdown, which released only a fraction of the dose astronauts would encounter? Not one Apollo astronaut ever contracted cancer.
The US goverment raised 30 billion to fund the mmon landings.
We havent been back there in 36 yrs. Why?
take for example the actual man on the moon wearing a space suit of equal weight to him should have been able to jump six feet off the ground. However footage studied showed they never moved more than about 18".
How were they able to develop film that should of, by rights, been rendered usless by the the extreme radiation.The astronauts took thousands of pictures, each one perfectly exposed and sharply focused. Not one was badly composed or even blurred.The pictures are so perfect each one would have taken a slick advertising agency hours to put them together. But the astronauts managed it repeatedly.
The US government needed a postitve distraction from the Vietnam war.
A bit of film that shows the american flag fluttering must be false as there is no atmosphere or wind on the moon.
Outer space is awash with deadly radiation that emanates from solar flares firing out from the sun. Standard astronauts orbiting earth in near space, like those who recently fixed the Hubble telescope, are protected by the earth's Van Allen belt. But the Moon is to 240,000 miles distant, way outside this safe band. And, during the Apollo flights, astronomical data shows there were no less than 1,485 such flares. a physicist who works for NASA, once said shielding at least two meters thick would be needed. Yet the walls of the Lunar Landers which took astronauts from the spaceship to the moons surface were, said NASA, about the thickness of heavy duty aluminum foil.
How could that stop this deadly radiation? And if the astronauts were protected by their space suits, why didn't rescue workers use such protective gear at the Chernobyl meltdown, which released only a fraction of the dose astronauts would encounter? Not one Apollo astronaut ever contracted cancer.
The US goverment raised 30 billion to fund the mmon landings.
We havent been back there in 36 yrs. Why?
