Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Islamic state

i think there are two reasons - firstly a political reason, the 'fuck me, Russians are using their big, strategic bombers!' thing that is for both domestic and external consumption, and secondly a rather more prosaic 'its what they've got'.

now - and i'm happy to be contradicted, perhaps DownwardDog will know better - the Russians never followed the Americans in converting both their big bombers and their training/doctrine to using strategic nuclear bombers as conventional bombers, and that their navigation/bombing systems didn't get modernised to use guided bombs - in effect, that Russian bombing hasn't changed much in accuracy terms from what Bomber Command was achieving over Germany in 1945.
Wiki reckons (with sources)that a handful of Tu-22M3's have been upgraded to carry guided bombs.
 
Cheers.

To slightly defend the Russians, their strategic bombers were built to lob cruise missiles, not overfly a target and drop on it. That said, unguided bombs and bombsights designed to 'aim' at city sized targets have no place in a war that has civilians within 500miles.

Not far off criminal.
 
Cheers.

To slightly defend the Russians, their strategic bombers were built to lob cruise missiles, not overfly a target and drop on it. That said, unguided bombs and bombsights designed to 'aim' at city sized targets have no place in a war that has civilians within 500miles.

Not far off criminal.
you seem to be saying russian technology now less advanced than german tech of the 1940s
 
now - and i'm happy to be contradicted, perhaps DownwardDog will know better - the Russians never followed the Americans in converting both their big bombers and their training/doctrine to using strategic nuclear bombers as conventional bombers, and that their navigation/bombing systems didn't get modernised to use guided bombs - in effect, that Russian bombing hasn't changed much in accuracy terms from what Bomber Command was achieving over Germany in 1945.

Russian/Sov DA (ie the Tu-22/95/160 force) has always concentrated on air launched cruise missiles, mainly the Kh-55 family, and have almost zero PGM capability. They went the ALCM route as a) they didn't fancy their chances in contested airspace and b) lack of access to cheap, high quality digital electronics necessary for US style laser/GPS guided weapons.

That also holds true for the more modern a/c they have in theater. In every picture you see of a Strike Flanker in Syria that's on its way to bomb anybody but ISIS it's loaded with dumb unguided FAB-500s. They're probably dropping them by dead reckoning.

As to why they've brought the Blinder/Backjack/Bear to the fight now - it's simple. They've exhausted the logistics tail for Su-34/24 ops so if they want to keep stepping up to the ockey this is the only way. Operation Syrian Freedom has stretched the Russian armed forces to their absolute limits eg they've recently had to buy 8 cargo ships urgently for the "Syria Express" Novorossysk to Tartus run.
 
I am in abkhazia at the min. the russian telly news in the cafe I am in is running a two minute propaganda video of russian planes and ships cut with scenes of bombing IS , to a soundtrack of thrash metal about every half hour so so.like a trailer of a call of duty release.
it quite possibly is a trailer for the russian call of duty release
 
As to why they've brought the Blinder/Backjack/Bear to the fight now - it's simple. They've exhausted the logistics tail for Su-34/24 ops so if they want to keep stepping up to the ockey this is the only way. Operation Syrian Freedom has stretched the Russian armed forces to their absolute limits eg they've recently had to buy 8 cargo ships urgently for the "Syria Express" Novorossysk to Tartus run.

Notes lack of reports of QRA intercepts of Russian aircraft loitering off NW Europe since mid September...
 
if i work it out correctly, the deployment of the BACKFIRE and BLACKJACK bombers is at least half Russias' entire fleet of airworthy strategic bombers. it will be interesting to see how long they can keep up a tempo of operations and what that will mean for their ability to mount operations in a less permissive environment...
 
Utter nonsense from him - that would have unleashed arab/kurdish war on the outskirts of ISIS areas to the benefit of ISIS and assad. PKK/YPG taking over the areas around Aleppo, Homs and so on - fantasy child. Seriously embarrassing and naive series of posts.

Unlikely seemingly many, I have a bit of a soft spot for Graeber. However, as already stressed this is just nonsense.

Which he is now repeating to a bigger audience

Turkey could cut off Islamic State’s supply lines. So why doesn’t it? | David Graeber
 
Two large explosions have been reported at a mobile phone market in northern Nigeria's main city, Kano. Scores are feared dead, according to local media.
A witness told Vanguard news that an improvised explosive device was planted close to the generator serving the market, while a second bomb went off in the center of the market.

Two traders at the market, Nafiu Mohammed and Suleiman Haruna, told AFP that a blast was felt "deep inside" the market shortly after 4:00 p.m. local time, and that rescuers are currently at the scene.

 
Two charts reveal the true extent of terrorism around the world

Link to the report in the article which is worth a read. According to the article Boko Haram (now wilayat gharb afriqiya of Daesh) killed more people than daesh. In total over 32000 people were killed by terrorists last year an 80% increase on the previous year. The majority of terrorist attacks are in just five countries, Iraq, Syria, Nigeria, Afghanistan and Pakistan
 
terror-index-chart.jpg
 
People's Daily reporting that daesh have murdered a Chinese and a Norwegian hostage, two months after a ransom demand first issued.
ETA link to Tweet which I couldn't manage on my phone:
 
Last edited:
Unlikely seemingly many, I have a bit of a soft spot for Graeber. However, as already stressed this is just nonsense.

Which he is now repeating to a bigger audience

Turkey could cut off Islamic State’s supply lines. So why doesn’t it? | David Graeber

butchersapron calling this utter nonsense caught my eye, so I went and read the article, having done so... surprise surprise no- not utter nonsense at all. If you think it is then please expand on what part of Graebers article you think is rubbish?
 
Back
Top Bottom