Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Islamic state

I'd assume it'd be targetted stuff using from people on the ground identifying targets rather than just carpet bombing. The region has been bombed from above on and off for most of my adult life, so clearly its a winning tactic for lasting peace
 
.:Middle East Online:::.

A bit of good news - possibly

Two Tunisian journalists who went missing in Libya and whose murder was claimed by the Islamic State group are alive, Tunisian Foreign Minister Taieb Baccouche said on Monday. Baccouche told private radio station Jawhara FM he had "irrefutable proof" that Sofiene Chourabi and Nadhir Ktari - who have been missing in eastern Libya since last September - "are alive".
 
The Islamist zero hour

Interesting and well researched essay about the origins, factors of support, and ideology of daesh here, i'm not sure i agree with all the conclusions because towards the end he calls for military action against assad and jabhat al nusra as well
 
8 posts in a row and tens of thousands more. Who are you working for?
Who the fuck is this freak? I expect a higher standard of loon on this site but maybe we've been spoilt in the past.

Seemingly taking offence at any and all criticism of IS is dodgy as fuck and I do think there's explaining to be done here, not least the apparent thinly veiled antisemitism.
 
I'd like to hear the background on how they identified an immediate threat which was urgent enough to bypass informing parliament - did the sad twats get caught out by using their mobiles?

I think there was something about an app , and the loons were warning their other members about it afterwards . And this immediate threat business sounds like something they've just made up .
 
I am not an IS apologist but there is nearly fuck all chance that these pair of cannon fodder dupes were in a position to mastermind a cunning attack on the UK.IMO of course

I don't know, and obviously we're never going to be in the position to evaluate the 'evidence' either way, but it doesn't take a huge stretch of imagination to think they could have been co-ordinating/directing/helping facilitate some activities in the UK.

I'd hazard a guess that while they themselves might not be the instigators of attacks in the UK, they might well have been being used due to their contacts (level of trust established with people in the UK for example) and language skills by others in IS to do so.
 
I'd like to know a bit more about the imminent threat and why these two as opposed to the countless other british jihadis out there. Does that mean that they have people here they were communicating with and if so, have they been arrested?
 
I'd like to know a bit more about the imminent threat and why these two as opposed to the countless other british jihadis out there. Does that mean that they have people here they were communicating with and if so, have they been arrested?

Reading between the lines it does sound like that was the case, although to what extent I think we won't know. I think the State is also saying they were also involved in failed plots earlier in the year.

It might also be that these two were being looked at due to the previous issues, and then they were hit due to logistical and practical considerations that made it possible, rather then them being the only targets.
 
The only good jihadist is a dead one, ones in your sight kill it only reason not is if it will lead you to more so you can rack up a bigger kill streak .

Join daesh your Hostis humani generis
 
Were these people guilty of anything? No, they did not have a trial, no given the right to defend themselves, which is usually what happens under British Law.
Oh, sorry, this was not in Britain. So we have the right to go killing individuals in one off attacks in other countries?
Do I feel safer because of those killings? If anything, I now feel less safe and fear repriasals.

NOT IN MY NAME
 
Nice simplistic sloganeering, but yes, the British State does have a 'right' to kill those it decides are an immediate risk to UK interests without recourse to trial.

The attack wasn't undertaken to make you feel safer, and how you feel now is irrelevant to the issue at hand, so any argument for or against it should be based on something more useful than your feelings I'm afraid.
 
Were these people guilty of anything? No, they did not have a trial, no given the right to defend themselves, which is usually what happens under British Law.
Oh, sorry, this was not in Britain. So we have the right to go killing individuals in one off attacks in other countries?
Do I feel safer because of those killings? If anything, I now feel less safe and fear repriasals.

NOT IN MY NAME

it doesn't seem right that the british state can just rock up anywhere they like and give someone the missile handshake, but its nothing new. And the violins here are a bit small I'm afraid, in this case

Last time a brazen whack job like this shocked me was when Isreal flew a copter down a busy street then planted a missile right through the windowscreen of the target. I was gobsmacked at it. (this was ages ago, before the rise of cyberdyne and the drones)
 
I cant say i agree with the precedent it sets but im not going to shed any tears and it's a bit naive to think the british state doesnt kill people all the time. They've done far worse than this.
 
Back
Top Bottom