Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Islamic state

It's grotesque (and probably arrogant). The people IS are killing in Hasakeh Tel'Abyad not to mention Rakka or Musul are my and our class brothers and sisters. Letting them loose from Britain is essentially to give IS a fresh supply of psychotic, homicidal manpower. It's as wretched as sending off hard right mercenaries to assist Rhodesia or UNITA.
they can fly out there, as long as we don't let them back in.
 
Even if this is true, I think the english speaking ones are very useful to Daesh in terms of propaganda tbh. People like jihadi john and the ones doing the Al Hayat Media Centre stuff.

if they are using the brits to work in their communications nodes - which seems to be the case - then that makes them easier to locate...
 
Tbh I think he might be dead.

quite possible. UK politicians might be squeamish about talking about targetting and killing individuals - in a way that the US and French aren't - but that doesn't extend to having it done. the Americans also have him towards the top of their shit list, which is not a place for someone looking forward to a long and happy retirement.

he might be in hiding within IS territory, but the various authorities know who he is, and if he's not dead already then either he will be, or he'll spend the rest of his life in the deepest, darkest American prison cell yet invented.
 
I think Re Jihadi John there was a rumour he was injured fighting in Kobani, but maybe also just retired as I don't think the Koran encourages celebrity amongst its strict adherents
 
I think Re Jihadi John there was a rumour he was injured fighting in Kobani, but maybe also just retired as I don't think the Koran encourages celebrity amongst its strict adherents

It doesn't encourage burning prisoners to death either.
 
8ball You say that but Daesh are guite good at digging back through obscure old texts to find examples of where that sort of thing has been allowed, based on the idea of 'qisas' or an eye for an eye etc.

Its obviously completely prohibited in mainstream Islam but unfortunately al-Baghdadi and co really know their stuff, making arguments with them on a religious basis quite difficult. They've immersed themselves in this shit for years. However mainstream muslim imams etc say they are not real muslims and however true that is arguing with daesh over religion is likely to make a lot of people very seriously embarrassed, not because their position is correct but because these guys have spent so much time thinking about their theology, al baghdadi allegedly has a phd in this stuff.

Any attempt to defeat daesh has got to start from a political and economic pov rather than religion. At worst even if you manage to convince a hard core salafist that isis isn"t the real islam they might try to join some sort of group that to their mind is even more extreme.
 
A 'Phd' in burning people in cages, mass executions and slavery. Great. :(

*note I do understand that there may be an alleged Phd in the theology of the whole thing but the results are self-evident.
 
:
I think Re Jihadi John there was a rumour he was injured fighting in Kobani, but maybe also just retired as I don't think the Koran encourages celebrity amongst its strict adherents
Retired. I like the Idea of an Isis equivalent to Bournemouth. Just pottering about on the front, playing bowls and shit. I wonder what the Isis pension is like.
 
It's grotesque (and probably arrogant). The people IS are killing in Hasakeh Tel'Abyad not to mention Rakka or Musul are my and our class brothers and sisters. Letting them loose from Britain is essentially to give IS a fresh supply of psychotic, homicidal manpower. It's as wretched as sending off hard right mercenaries to assist Rhodesia or UNITA.

The only (partial) "saving grace" being that most of the psychotic etc manpower is so ill-trained in basic tactics that they either become REMFs or die quickly on the front lines.
 
8ball You say that but Daesh are guite good at digging back through obscure old texts to find examples of where that sort of thing has been allowed, based on the idea of 'qisas' or an eye for an eye etc.

Its obviously completely prohibited in mainstream Islam but unfortunately al-Baghdadi and co really know their stuff, making arguments with them on a religious basis quite difficult. They've immersed themselves in this shit for years. However mainstream muslim imams etc say they are not real muslims and however true that is arguing with daesh over religion is likely to make a lot of people very seriously embarrassed, not because their position is correct but because these guys have spent so much time thinking about their theology, al baghdadi allegedly has a phd in this stuff.

Any attempt to defeat daesh has got to start from a political and economic pov rather than religion. At worst even if you manage to convince a hard core salafist that isis isn"t the real islam they might try to join some sort of group that to their mind is even more extreme.

This is the problem. There is no arguing with them that I can see. They don't seem to be interested in a discussion. Just nutters that our own govt. helped create obeying the law that there is a price to pay for dismantling countries and causing millions of deaths.
 
8ball You say that but Daesh are guite good at digging back through obscure old texts to find examples of where that sort of thing has been allowed, based on the idea of 'qisas' or an eye for an eye etc.

In which case I'm sure they could come up with something to justify celebrity executioners.

In any case, I hope you're right and the fucker's dead.
 
This is the problem. There is no arguing with them that I can see. They don't seem to be interested in a discussion. Just nutters that our own govt. helped create obeying the law that there is a price to pay for dismantling countries and causing millions of deaths.

I was really tempted to start trolling and winding them up on their blogs but its not worth it is it?
 
Depending on your upbringing and experiences it could be easy to be attracted to this (at say potential soldier age) by recent events.

It's true. But you have to wonder about a group of people who can be driven to such tantrums by a cartoon. Played properly, you might get a few to off themselves before they can take anyone with them.
 
I think they're fragile enough that if you did it cleverly you could really upset them.

Not a road I'd want to go down tbh, if you are potentially dealing with psychologically fragile people, they can react in unpredictable ways. See bombs and associated atrocities...
 
Not a road I'd want to go down tbh, if you are potentially dealing with psychologically fragile people, they can react in unpredictable ways. See bombs and associated atrocities...

Obviously it's just a thought experiment at this stage.

One might be inclined to advise them on dirty bomb recipes that only kill the user, of course...
 
Not a road I'd want to go down tbh, if you are potentially dealing with psychologically fragile people, they can react in unpredictable ways. See bombs and associated atrocities...

I understand where you are coming from and I am comparatively ignorant, but this smacks of fear. What I mean is it implies we can't even engage with them, tackle their bullshit and take the piss out of them. I know the war is real and all, but 'hearts and minds' always helps. As 8ball just said its just fancy possibly unsanctified.
 
The war is real, and a few dead fuckwits who didn't know about how to create dispersive radioactive agents without killing themselves always helps in my book.
 
Back
Top Bottom