dylanredefined
Not a house elf a tiger
Hard enough getting boots out of stores at the moment so we don't have any spare to drop on iraq.
Don't you live in London Batboy? We've had Islamist terrorists blowing up trains and hacking the heads off soldiers!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/24/kurds-isis-us_n_7430990.htmlAs the U.S.-led coalition against ISIS reels from major setbacks in halting the extremist group’s continued creep into Iraq and Syria, lawmakers from across the aisle Sunday said the U.S. was failing to use what could perhaps be its best weapon against the ISIS offensive: Kurdish forces that are begging to get into the fight.
Gabbard recently co-sponsored an amendment in the House National Defense Authorization Act to directly arm Kurdish forces
American politicians saying arm the Kurds. I thought this had been happening for a long time, but maybe not because the Iraqi govt is opposed. If so, fuck the Iraqi govt & give the Kurds all the arms they need.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/24/kurds-isis-us_n_7430990.html
I'm not saying it's a quick solution but it seems an obvious necessity. And since Turkey is already backing ISIS, to hell with them.Arm the Kurds, piss off the Turks who are already privately backing elements of ISIS. There is no quick solution to this mess including that of arming the Kurds.
Would you, would anyone here?
ERBIL, Kurdistan Region – Islamic State (ISIS) militants have executed at least 400 people in Palmyra since capturing the Syrian city on Wednesday, including women, children and the elderly, the official Syrian Arab News Agency (SANA) reported.
Dozens of victims were government employees, including the head of the nursing department at the National Hospital, who was killed along with her entire family, SANA quoted reliable sources in the city as saying. It said the militants were hunting down government loyalists.
“ISIS terrorists slaughtered and mutilated at least 400 civilians, including children, women and elderly people,” the agency reported. They “were killed on charges of loyalty to the Syrian government and disobedience to ISIS,” it said.
“Thousands of other residents are besieged inside the city as ISIS has prevented them from leaving,” it added. “The residents are having their properties seized by ISIS members.”
http://rudaw.net/english/middleeast/syria/25052015
Arm the Kurds, piss off the Turks who are already privately backing elements of ISIS. There is no quick solution to this mess including that of arming the Kurds.
yeh because the americans did such a sterling job of swiftly overcoming all resistance to them in 2003 it's like the last decade never happened.Oh there is a quick solution Iraqi freedom 3 or is it 4? The US getting its war on again would smash Isis in days.
Fortunately no one wants that.
yeh because the americans did such a sterling job of swiftly overcoming all resistance to them in 2003 it's like the last decade never happened.
Arm the Kurds, piss off the Turks who are already privately backing elements of ISIS. There is no quick solution to this mess including that of arming the Kurds.
i don't think they'd seek to hold any ground against us forces.They smashed the Iraq army it was the insurgency/civil war they were shit at dealing with. Isis would not be able to hold any ground against the US forces.
They smashed the Iraq army it was the insurgency/civil war they were shit at dealing with. Isis would not be able to hold any ground against the US forces.
i think dylanredefined was talking about full-on positional battles in which isis would bring out its tanks and the americans would bring out their tanks and the two would duke it out till one of them was gone. but i don't things happen like that any more and if the americans did decide to go back in they'd better be more savvy than they were before lest they make matters worse. but going in would in and of itself make matters worse because all of this clusterfuck, being as it's a proxy war being fought by the saudis and iran and the gulf states - the yanks jumping in the middle would splash everything wider.Like the Taliban can't ?
These places are never anything like the potrayal in the meeja so I would and have. I've been to Syria and Saudi in the past few years. I wouldn't hesitate to go Pakistan beyond the fact that it holds no particular appeal.
i think dylanredefined was talking about full-on positional battles in which isis would bring out its tanks and the americans would bring out their tanks and the two would duke it out till one of them was gone. but i don't things happen like that any more and if the americans did decide to go back in they'd better be more savvy than they were before lest they make matters worse. but going in would in and of itself make matters worse because all of this clusterfuck, being as it's a proxy war being fought by the saudis and iran and the gulf states - the yanks jumping in the middle would splash everything wider.
syria? or iraq? or both?But the Saudis and the gulf states to a large extent are the US and British proxy in the region, who've just been sold squillions more in hardware . The yanks are already in the middle making it worse . They've been at this 4 years now and simply aren't going to stop the destruction of the very country they deliberately set out to destroy .
syria? or iraq? or both?
incidentally, after 9/11 it's not so clear who the proxy is in the relationship between the usa and sa.
There is . Make very clear to all states arming terrorist groups in the region they'll be placed on the list of states that sponsor terrorist groups and face all the sanctions that go with that . Have western states follow their own fucking laws . Except they'll turn around and point out the US and Britain has been at it too . So the US and Britain need to knock it on the head as well .
This attempt at regime change has, as was perfectly foreseeable, spawned a monster . Indeed a number of monsters . Just as it did in Libya .
Where according to Seymour Hersh, it appears both MI5 and the CIA are deeply implicated in the transfer of the Libyan arsenal to terrorist groups in Syria . Hundreds of tonnes of weapons via Turkey . One boat alone carried 400 tonnes .
As the western states own intelligence files indicate they were pretty sure in advance what would happen in Syria once they began destabilising . To approach this issue on the basis the west don't want this chaos is very naive in my view . It was perfectly foreseeable . But they did it anyway . Which means in essence they got what they wanted .
if only they hadn't started gw2 (or afghanistan) they wouldn't be in such a bloody mess.Both in my view . I've been on here before saying what the west want out of this is Sykes picot 2 . Which is why they started it .
So on that basis, would you go to Syria tomorrow?
Damascus, sure. Raqqa, probably not.