Orang Utan
Psychick Worrier Ov Geyoor
And before that?As I just said, our models break down. It might turn to be the case that there was no "before". Like asking "what's beyond the edge of the Earth", when as it turns out, there is no edge.
And before that?As I just said, our models break down. It might turn to be the case that there was no "before". Like asking "what's beyond the edge of the Earth", when as it turns out, there is no edge.
And before that?
This is why in my opinion the universe is not expanding. The universe is and always will be the same size (size=1 universe) but the things inside it are all getting smaller.There wasn't a "before" the big bang, because time is a property of the universe created. There isn't an "outside" for the universe to expand into, because space is a property of the universe inside its finite expanding boundary.
The world has got an edge though. You’re stood on it, and you can go upwards away from itAs I just said, our models break down. It might turn to be the case that there was no "before". Like asking "what's beyond the edge of the Earth", when as it turns out, there is no edge.
This is why in my opinion the universe is not expanding. The universe is and always will be the same size (size=1 universe) but the things inside it are all getting smaller.
The world has got an edge though. You’re stood on it, and you can go upwards away from it
The alleged beginningBefore what?
The alleged beginning
There must be.What makes you think there was anything before?
Because...There must be.
The world has got an edge though. You’re stood on it, and you can go upwards away from it
We actually have a 5* universeYou're comparing the Earth, a 3 dimensional object within the universe, with the universe itself - a 4* dimensional object.
*actually more, but let's keep it simple for visualisation purposes.
There’s always a beforeBecause...
We actually have a 5* universe
There must be.
I don't see whyThere’s always a before
There’s always a before
"Before" is only a concept which existed from the moment of creation onwards. So there wasn't a before.There’s always a before
No you prove itProve it.
There must have been a before before the not before"Before" is only a concept which existed from the moment of creation onwards. So there wasn't a before.
No you prove it
I have no intention of shouldering that burden. You’re the scientist. You solve it with your white coats and your labs and your microscopesYou're the one making the positive claim that time extends infinitely into the past. The burden of evidence is upon your shoulders, not mine.
I have no intention of shouldering that burden. You’re the scientist. You solve it with your white coats and your labs and your microscopes
I haven’t got a lab. Get to workWhy should other people substantiate your assumptions?
I haven’t got a lab. Get to work
i built a model plane but my model broke down before i reached new york. i now declare new york does not exist according to my model, which is correct in every detail except for being made of balsa.As I just said, our models break down. It might turn to be the case that there was no "before". Like asking "what's beyond the edge of the Earth", when as it turns out, there is no edge.
he claims time and the universe existed today like it did yesterday and the day before. you are the one claiming that ages ago none of it existed. i think its you who has to offer the proof.Why should other people substantiate your assumptions?
A couple of piesWhat grants are you prepared to offer?
You raise an interesting point. Before the before there wasn't a before, so the not before isn't actually a not before (which is an after), but an absence of before.There must have been a before before the not before