Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

the all new 2005 who's taking a trip to holloway thread

MC5 said:
What do they do that is 'fucking nasty' to young recruits and where do they say that there's 'nothing wrong' with child abuse?
i don't know maybe in the quotes fkin posted earlier on this fred sherlock :p

Mr Marsh your being mean to the other boys and girls there, i think.
 
Pickman's model said:
name names! :mad:

the nihilst enforcment unit demands the head of LLETSA asa well as punishment beatings to hibee, and re education classes to be held by comrade pickmans maybe, for the afore mentioned counter revolutionaries.
 
Is there any actual evidence that the Sparts are a CIA front?

I tried a google search on this a while back, and all I got was press stories of them picketing Chomsky's public appearances on the grounds that he was soft on US imperialism.

Oh, how we laughed.
 
jackwupton said:
Make them clean the toilets in the offices? Tell them not to associate with friends from other political tendencies? Hammer home a line and belittle them systematically if they deviate? Force them to move university so they can be closer to the group and further away from 'anti-communist' forces? Force upon them a level of hyper-politicisation that makes it impossible for them to have a normal social life? Make them think it's acceptable to only only dress like Lenin and have a stupid fucking Soviet Union coat, but to also have a fucking Lenin beard? Jesus I hate that dick.

You've just made that up.

I think refering to the Michael Jackson trials as an Anti-Sex vendetta pretty much shows that, no?

No.

Whether you think he's innocent or not, they refer to child abuse trials as "anti-sex". Therefore, they consider child abuse sex.

No they don't, they believe in the right to privacy and the right to consensual sexual relations. They also reject all laws that criminalise consensual sex for youth.
 
MC5 said:
They also reject all laws that criminalise consensual sex for youth.

And for middle aged men and youth.

Edit: are you you're not a spart? Don't see what other reason there is to defend this lot :confused:
 
Taxamo Welf said:
i don't know maybe in the quotes fkin posted earlier on this fred sherlock :p

You 'don't know' and 'maybe in the quotes' is not good enough Dr Watson?
 
Random said:
And for middle aged men and youth.

Edit: are you you're not a spart? Don't see what other reason there is to defend this lot :confused:

What about middle aged men and youth?

I'm not defending anyone here. If someone decides to post scurrilous nonsense then they can expect to be pulled up on it.
 
MC5 said:
What about middle aged men and youth?

THe sparts seem to think that Jackson (a middle aged man) has the right to sleep with children, and are defending this right. Don't you agree?
 
Paul Marsh said:
So Charlie, any of this on your stall this year?

ixl.jpg
Nope
 
Random said:
THe sparts seem to think that Jackson (a middle aged man) has the right to sleep with children, and are defending this right. Don't you agree?

Why do you think that sleeping with children is sexual abuse? Let's face it, there are probably middle aged fathers out there doing just that on occasions, when their children need reassurance, if they're ill for example - doesn't make them "abusers" does it?

Has Jackson slept with children other than his own? I think he mentioned in the interview with Martin Bashir that children had slept in the same room as him, but not in his bed. Jackson steadfastly maintains that he has been asexual in his relations with boys. A jury member said that "Things just didn't add up." with regard to the prosecution case.

Anyway, that's not what this organisation is defending, but rather this:

We fight for people's right to have consensual sex with whomever they choose. Or to look at pornography. Or to do nothing at all.

Now, you may spin this to include children in the 'whomever', but it is clear that it is young people they are defending against 'imposing abstinence, guilt and fear' about them 'wanting to have sex' and also the state attempting to 'enforce puritanical values pushed by religion, and provide a moral justification for government interference in all other aspects of life'.
 
:eek: what are you doing to my beautiful thread? :eek: :mad:

:(
MC5 said:
Why do you think that sleeping with children is sexual abuse? Let's face it, there are probably middle aged fathers out there doing just that on occasions, when their children need reassurance, if they're ill for example - doesn't make them "abusers" does it?

Has Jackson slept with children other than his own? I think he mentioned in the interview with Martin Bashir that children had slept in the same room as him, but not in his bed. Jackson steadfastly maintains that he has been asexual in his relations with boys. A jury member said that "Things just didn't add up." with regard to the prosecution case.

Anyway, that's not what this organisation is defending, but rather this:



Now, you may spin this to include children in the 'whomever', but it is clear that it is young people they are defending against 'imposing abstinence, guilt and fear' about them 'wanting to have sex' and also the state attempting to 'enforce puritanical values pushed by religion, and provide a moral justification for government interference in all other aspects of life'.
 
Herbert Read said:
the nihilst enforcment unit demands the head of LLETSA asa well as punishment beatings to hibee, and re education classes to be held by comrade pickmans maybe, for the afore mentioned counter revolutionaries.

If I do decide to attend I'll look out for someone in a black hoodie and a bandana who looks like he couldn't dish out "punishment beatings" to Andy Pandy.
 
hibee said:
If I do decide to attend I'll look out for someone in a black hoodie and a bandana who looks like he couldn't dish out "punishment beatings" to Andy Pandy.
it's very difficult to adequately punish a counter-revolutionary puppet.

AA_Andy_Pandy.jpg
 
MC5 said:
Now, you may spin this to include children in the 'whomever', but it is clear that it is young people they are defending against 'imposing abstinence, guilt and fear' about them 'wanting to have sex' and also the state attempting to 'enforce puritanical values pushed by religion, and provide a moral justification for government interference in all other aspects of life'.
The sparts frequently defend NAMBLA (north american man-boy love association - a paedophile ring) in their publications. They denounced michael jackson's trial as an Anti-Sex vendetta (meaning that they weren't talking about non-sexual episodes of children sleeping beside adults).

For a few years, whenever one of their three Dublin members (all imported from north america) came across the WSM, they would harrangue us for supporting 'castration of all men'. On the one occasion that I bothered to ask them where they got this abjectly lunatic idea from, they informed me that it was a logical consequence of our 'anti-sex' attitude as evidenced by a front page story that we had published in Workers Solidarity.

The headline was something like "get the child rapists out of the classrooms" beside a picture of a catholic priest. I consider that to be fairly conclusive proof of their support for paedophiles.

On the other hand, beating them up or chasing them away would bestow far too much importance upon them and make them feel like the 'heroic revolutionary vanguard of the oppressed proletariat' that they long to be. Pointing and laughing is much more appropriate and effective as a means of demoralising them.

are you really a 'spart in cyberspaaaaaaaaace'?

*points and sniggers*
 
Sorry to put the thread back on track, but aye, I'll be there, flogging Norwich Anarchists wares....it will be the unveiling of the new issue of our paper so we'll probably be under a table, furiously folding the fuckers.
 
gurrier said:
are you really a 'spart in cyberspaaaaaaaaace'?

*points and sniggers*

No, as I said, not a spart. Although I could become a member of your sect. Now that would really piss me off.

*gives finger and snorts*
 
Back
Top Bottom