Thanks for the points raised above.
...how do we know the profits won't end up with a commercial developer - or even you!
Brixton Green Limited is run for the benefit of the local community. It can only use its funds and assets for this purpose. Neither directors, board members or share holders can take a profit.
We will need to work with development partner(s). The best way for us to reduce the cost of these partnerships is to:
• Clarify what we want to build.
• Have a good understanding of the issues and costs involved.
• Reduce the risks.
We plan to do this as follows:
1. Detailed brief - this will involve workshops with local groups and organisations. Throughout we will include feedback from a team of experts.
2. Detailed feasibility study .
3. Panel set up to select development partner(s).
The whole process needs to be transparent.
If you are involved with a group or organisation who would like to have a Brixton Green workshop, please contact us through
www.brixtongreen.org or call 020 7183 5838
Southwyck House was built 'facing the wrong way' (motorway*
) and there is the railway line. What benefits does your scheme hold in all these respects?
Southwyck House, the railway and the unwelcoming alley at Somerleyton Way have the effect of discouraging access to this part of Coldharbour Lane and the Somerleyton triangle. This reduces economic activity and community safety.
Our proposal addresses this in three key ways:
1.
Creative hub at the junction of Coldhabour Lane and Somerleyton Road.
This will bring together three established Brixton arts organisations, a chefs school, post office/credit union and more. The visitors and activity this will attract will extend Brixton town centre,*drawing visitors through the market and encourage*regeneration towards Loughborough Junction.
2.
Community hub at the entrance to the alley of Somerleyton Way.
Using community activity to make the alley a welcoming connection between Mayall Road and Somerleyton Road. This will include a*children’s’ nursery, health care/dentist, hair & beauty training salon, chemist/corner shop.
3.
Street facing homes.
Front gardens, family units on the ground floor, communal gardens and allotments at the rear.
How will residents in the new housing be chosen?
This will be decided during the detailed brief and feasibility work.
Why is your scheme better than a simple HA development?
Central Brixton has some complicated regeneration issues that have not been properly resolved for 40 years. This strip of land in particular is of strategic importance to the community in Brixton as it divides off central Brixton from the rest of Coldharbour Lane and the Somerleyton triangle.
A proposal that is owned by Brixton people and driven by Brixton people will be better placed to galvanise the community and bring forward a holistic proposal on this site.
...the land is already community owned.
Lambeth Council owns the majority of the site. If it is to be developed, Lambeth Council will need to enter into an arrangement with a private developer, housing association or a community led initiative.
Press inaccuracies
As I mentioned before we have had some inaccuracies in how the press has covered Brixton Green. As we improve our online information we will hopefully reduce any errors.
Independent article - "Land liberation society"
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-s...er-regenerate-wasted-urban-space-2225102.html
The Independent ran an excellent article featuring Brixton Green. I would like to clear up some of the points it made which were not accurate and have caused concern on this forum.
• Brixton Green is not setting up and has never planned to set up an "
arms length delivery vehicle".
• Brixton Green has never claimed that Lambeth have transferred or sold the site to us.
• Brixton Green has never described the site as vacant or derelict.
• Our organisation is Brixton Green Limited not
"Brixton Green Community Land Trust".
• The article mentions
"Once complete, the scheme will be jointly managed by Lambeth Council, residents and local businesses. "
The necessary management structure for the scheme will only be decided during the detailed brief/feasibility study. We have never discussed a structure that involved the scheme being "
jointly managed by Lambeth Council, residents and local businesses."
• The article mentions "
In addition to housing, the scheme will include small stores and workshops, including a cluster of high-quality Caribbean manicure and hairstyling boutique."
This is inaccurate. The current proposal includes a hair and beauty training salon, not a cluster of boutiques.
Please come to our site to see the current proposal
www.brixtongreen.org
• The proposal does not rely on community shares for the funding of the project. We are selling 5,000 £1 shares to 5,000 individuals who live or work in Brixton. Their purpose is to ensure the ownership of our organisation is with people who live and work in the area, not to raise finance.
