Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

SUVs make up more than 40% of new cars sold in the UK – while fully electric vehicles account for less than 2%

And again last night. I don't go around keying cars but I wouldn't cry any tears if someone scraped the fuck out of this piece of shit's car.

1699213808292.png
 
That car is parked in a driveway since there is a dropped kerb immediately behind it so it's not parked illegally nor was it illegally driven there.
 
If you try to report cars on the pavement with a photo to the council they won't do anything because it's only illegal to drive on the pavement and photos only show the car stationary. And it might have been dropped there by helicopter or something.
I believe it's different in London, where I think editor lives. There pavement parking is banned, and there's been a big push, from Living Streets amongst others, to bring the rest of the country in line with the capital.
 
The last few pages make for some confusing reading. Are we at peace with any and all cars being keyed if parked on the street even if parked legally and responsibly, as some replies to post #2834 suggest, or only those parked in an obstructive or illegal way? Some people don’t seem to be able to make their mind up on the matter.
 
That car is parked in a driveway since there is a dropped kerb immediately behind it so it's not parked illegally nor was it illegally driven there.
It's not a driveway and it's blocking the pavement so people in wheelchairs or people pushing prams have to walk into a busy A road. And you're defending that?
 
That car is parked in a driveway since there is a dropped kerb immediately behind it so it's not parked illegally nor was it illegally driven there.

It's your car isn't it?

Can't think of other any reason why anyone would defend such obviously shit and antisocial behaviour.
 
I can see what I think is a dropped kerb (though it might be interesting to see whether that's a council dropped kerb, or some blokes with some concrete when the council aren't looking...), but it looks to me as if the pavement is blocked - but again, depends if its actually a pavement.
1699213808292~2.png

I think it's a driveway...

To me, that looks like very bad manners. No idea about legality...
 
That car is parked in a driveway since there is a dropped kerb immediately behind it so it's not parked illegally nor was it illegally driven there.
Actually you have to park on your land and that looks like at least a 1/3rds on the pavement so council land if there was a double yellow line it would get a ticket.
But would have to be attached to the rear as we can’t enter private land to attach tickets.
As the “surredean road liberation front found out”😂
Resident whined about van dwellers so got a residents only permit scheme and discovered the access driveway on their nice green verges was council land and you can’t park there sir😂. “But you were only meant to target the scumbags”
 
It's not a driveway and it's blocking the pavement so people in wheelchairs or people pushing prams have to walk into a busy A road. And you're defending that?
Nope not defending it at all however based on what I can see in the photo it's parked here

1699259916428.png

Which is clearly a driveway with a dropped kerb, If you want to argue it's selfish and inconsiderate then sure, happy to agree with you but illegal it isn't.
Unless as likesfish points out it's bum is blocking access behind it. Happy to bow to his superior knowledge
It's your car isn't it?

Can't think of other any reason why anyone would defend such obviously shit and antisocial behaviour.
If it was my car Frank it must have been stolen that is 140 miles away from where I live
 
Their land presumably starts at the fence line. A driveway crossing a pavement doesn’t give you the right to block it.
Yeah, pretty sure you just get a right of way across a pavement, it doesn't become your property. A right of way literally just means a right to move through it, not stop in it for as long as you fancy. That applies even if the section is paved by the private landowner with right of way (who paves it is probably agreed with the council, but it won't change ownership).
 
Nope not defending it at all however based on what I can see in the photo it's parked here

View attachment 398805

Which is clearly a driveway with a dropped kerb, If you want to argue it's selfish and inconsiderate then sure, happy to agree with you but illegal it isn't.
Unless as likesfish points out it's bum is blocking access behind it. Happy to bow to his superior knowledge

If it was my car Frank it must have been stolen that is 140 miles away from where I live
So, let's get this straight. You're asserting that cars, vans and any other vehicle can completely block a pavement for as long as they like, so long as is a 'driveway,' even when the vehicle has absolutely nothing to do with the supposed 'owners' of the pavement?

You're talking utter shit but I guess that reflects your attitude towards the rights of pedestrians who you think should be forced into dangerous A roads.

Parking on footways or footpaths (pavements, grass verges, alleyways, etc), or in front of dropped footways or raised carriageways (for example driveways or pedestrian crossings) is banned on almost all streets in London at all times, including at night and weekends. If you park in such a way then you could receive a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) and may also be towed away – even if only one or two wheels are on the footway.
Reasons for the bans

  • to prevent obstruction to pedestrians. Cars and other vehicles parked on footways or at pedestrian crossings can make life difficult and dangerous for pedestrians, in particular for wheelchair users, people with baby buggies and the visually impaired. Vehicles parked in front of driveways block access to and from the premises
  • to prevent damage to the footway. Unlike road surfaces, footways are not designed to take the weight of cars or other motor vehicles. Much of the damage to London’s footways (cracked or sunken paving slabs etc) is caused by vehicles parking illegally on the footway. Repairs cost London’s councils millions of pounds each year, and tripping on damaged footways is the cause of many pedestrian injuries
  • to maintain footways as an amenity. The presence of cars and other vehicles parked on footways, verges and other pedestrian areas is detrimental to the urban environment.


 
Last edited:
So, let's get this straight. You're asserting that cars, vans and any other vehicle can completely block a pavement for as long as they like if it is a 'driveway,' even when the vehicle has absolutely nothing to do with the supposed 'owners' of the pavement?
Nope I'm asserting that the guy hasn't done anything illegal no matter how much he may have annoyed you. It's illegal to drive over pavements but he hasn't actually done so in this case. It's not illegal to park on pavements (I agree with you that it should be but it isn't). Unless there are parking restrictions there (and it doesn't look like it in either photo) the the guy (gender not necessarily assumed here) may be a selfish dick but he hasn't actually done anything that any action can be taken against him.
 
Nope I'm asserting that the guy hasn't done anything illegal no matter how much he may have annoyed you. It's illegal to drive over pavements but he hasn't actually done so in this case. It's not illegal to park on pavements (I agree with you that it should be but it isn't). Unless there are parking restrictions there (and it doesn't look like it in either photo) the the guy (gender not necessarily assumed here) may be a selfish dick but he hasn't actually done anything that any action can be taken against him.
Again: parking on the pavement is illegal in London.

Pavement parking is banned throughout the 32 London boroughs, and the City of London under the Greater London (General Purposes) Act 1974.

The Highway Code states; 'You MUST NOT park partially or wholly on the pavement in London'. All councils in London can and should enforce this law by issuing parking tickets to any vehicles parked on pavements, unless there is a sign there that specifically permits it.
 
I wonder why this isn’t enforced in my corner of Barnet. We have a Labour council now, so it can’t be a matter of ideological resistance against “woke wars on motorists”. Maybe it’s because there aren’t any other local parking regulations for CEOs to enforce? But they could make an absolute mint by skipping down our street ticketing any car with two wheels on the pavement.

likesfish any idea?

On another note, the London Councils information sheet that editor posted makes the good point that pavements can’t support the weight of cars. This is true. It also explains why pavement slabs are uneven and hazardous on roads which have lots of dropped kerbs and paved driveways.

As it’s not possible to magic away private parking, and cars are only going to get heavier as EVs become mainstream, councils should be able tax driveway owners and spend the proceeds on super-strong pavements that are as easy for wheelchair and mobility scooter users to glide on as the floors in airports and shopping centres.
 
Last edited:
Brighton unless your on the pavement behind double yellows bus stops or zig zags ( zig zags the council only recently realised they could enforce that. It was a glorious day when some people got a ticket they weren’t expecting😈😂).
It maybe the council hasn’t gone through the minute of parking regulations and hasn’t given new instructions. We constantly get told by delivery drivers and HGV drivers that we are a lot more reasonable than London CEOS
 
I am enjoying this:
And here's why those shithawk cars should be taken off the roads:
After a period of falling, the CO2 emissions of new cars sold in both the UK and the EU have been rising since 2016. Experts attribute the reversal to an increase in SUV sales. In 2006 SUVs accounted for 7% of new cars in Europe. By the early part of this year more than half of all new car sales in Europe were SUVs or SUV-styled cars. Between 2001 and 2022, in an outbreak of ongoing auto-obesity, the average kerb weight of cars sold in Europe increased by 21%. The International Energy Agency has said that annual CO2 emissions from the world’s 330m SUVs reached almost 1bn tonnes last year. According to the government, the transport sector is the biggest source of CO2 emissions in the UK (accounting for 34% of the total), with the “large majority” coming from road transport.
 
Data for those interested. FWIW, new car CO2 emissions are actually at their lowest ever but I don't feel that means a lot when BEVs are now 12% of the market so you can't easily prove anything off that data. The number of new cars exhausting 110-130g/km has gone up, but that's not massive SUVs, that's over 40MPG. There's a huge decline in sub-100g cars, but that's the death of diesel. Only the very smallest of petrol engines can achieve those numbers. Average CO2 emissions of the total UK passenger car fleet has gone down every year this century.
 
You wont find any SUVs with seats lower than in an estate car or hatchback. The defining characteristic of a SUV is ride height.
and why SUVs and People carriers before were beloved by the Arthritic, those iwth cardio-respiratory sproblems that struggle to get up and down etc and by ambulatory disabled people
 
People buy Ford Predator-style pickup trucks because they get ludicrous tax benefits thanks to HMRC:

cousin's OH was an Agronomist , no reall need for van like carrying capacity as they had minions with vans or old skool Defender 90s to do small deliveries and collect samples for soil / crop lab

had previously had audi quatros and subarus until the B-i-K tax break came in double cab pickups
 
Data for those interested. FWIW, new car CO2 emissions are actually at their lowest ever but I don't feel that means a lot when BEVs are now 12% of the market so you can't easily prove anything off that data. The number of new cars exhausting 110-130g/km has gone up, but that's not massive SUVs, that's over 40MPG. There's a huge decline in sub-100g cars, but that's the death of diesel. Only the very smallest of petrol engines can achieve those numbers. Average CO2 emissions of the total UK passenger car fleet has gone down every year this century.
If only people stopped buying resource-heavy, over-engineered, over-sized, heavy vehicles and new car CO2 emissions would be reduced at a stroke.

Most of the comments in the article you've linked to are people requesting sources for the data, which the author refuses to give (see comment #2)
 
Data for those interested. FWIW, new car CO2 emissions are actually at their lowest ever but I don't feel that means a lot when BEVs are now 12% of the market so you can't easily prove anything off that data. The number of new cars exhausting 110-130g/km has gone up, but that's not massive SUVs, that's over 40MPG. There's a huge decline in sub-100g cars, but that's the death of diesel. Only the very smallest of petrol engines can achieve those numbers. Average CO2 emissions of the total UK passenger car fleet has gone down every year this century.
Here's some actual, sourced data which totally contradicts your claims.

The average emissions from new cars in Great Britain fell year on year between 2011 and 2016– a total of 13% over this time. Since 2016, average emissions for new cars began to rise year on year – a total increase of 6% between 2016 and 2019.

As ultra-low emission cars only represent a small proportion of the cars on the road (1.1%), the recent increase has been ascribed to several factors, which have cancelled out the reductions from ultra-low emission cars.

These include: a rise in the sale of sports utility vehicles (SUVs); increased road traffic and travel by car; and revised methods for estimating carbon emissions given differences between emissions measured in laboratory conditions and those measured on the road

 
If only people stopped buying resource-heavy, over-engineered, over-sized, heavy vehicles and new car CO2 emissions would be far, far lower.
Absolutely true, but the trend seems to be that even people buying cars and not SUVs are buying larger, more powerful vehicles. A lot of that has to do with the minimal cost of a vehicle these days. Even the tiniest, wheeziest hatchback will run you up to £14k. The relative cost of upsizing is lower than it has ever been and people snatch the opportunity, even when they're not opting for an SUV. Any sort of solution needs to address this.

Edit: My source is more up to date than your source. New car emissions are at their lowest ever in recent data. However, I did grant that the surge in BEVs makes it very difficult to sort out how that breaks down.
 
Absolutely true, but the trend seems to be that even people buying cars and not SUVs are buying larger, more powerful vehicles. A lot of that has to do with the minimal cost of a vehicle these days. Even the tiniest, wheeziest hatchback will run you up to £14k. The relative cost of upsizing is lower than it has ever been and people snatch the opportunity, even when they're not opting for an SUV. Any sort of solution needs to address this.
It's also got a lot to do with the motor industry which is prioritising larger, heavier and pointlessly powerful cars.
 
Back
Top Bottom