Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Subway vigilante kills Michael Jackson impersonator

Remember seeing it quite a fair bit, the so called care in the community replacing the treatment of mentally ill people.
Yes, that started during the Thatcher years. Widespread closing down of mental health facilities and calling it Care in the Community. In reality it was abandoning mentally vulnerable patients.
 
Because you not only appear to think that the use of a potentially lethal action (indeed, it was a lethal action) was justified, and have defended the person who used it.
I don't know of course but I think that the marine didn't intend to kill the guy merely incapacitate him so the death wasn't intentional. When Middle Q was doing her nursing degree one of her fellow students dropped out because some cunt set her hair on fire on the bus one morning. No-one got involved despite the bus being full.
Personally I would prefer that people get involved rather than not and if sometimes a mistake is made then that is a tragedy but that doesn't mean people should turn a blind eye.
It's easy from the convenience of thousands of miles away and several days later for people to say X should have done/not done this not so if you're there at the time.
I would expect the NYPD to investigate and if they discover than the marine was a raging white supremacist just waiting for his chance then yeah prosecute him, based on what I (and you) know then I'm still leaning to the tragic accident pov.
 
Yes, that started during the Thatcher years. Widespread closing down of mental health facilities and calling it Care in the Community. In reality it was abandoning mentally vulnerable patients.

The principle behind the move was good. People had been confined in institutions for decades with very poor quality of life.

The trouble was that it is actually less expensive to keep someone in an institution than it is to look after them in the community. The funding was not put in place, we now have the deplorable current situation.
 
I don't know of course but I think that the marine didn't intend to kill the guy merely incapacitate him so the death wasn't intentional. When Middle Q was doing her nursing degree one of her fellow students dropped out because some cunt set her hair on fire on the bus one morning. No-one got involved despite the bus being full.
Personally I would prefer that people get involved rather than not and if sometimes a mistake is made then that is a tragedy but that doesn't mean people should turn a blind eye.
It's easy from the convenience of thousands of miles away and several days later for people to say X should have done/not done this not so if you're there at the time.
I would expect the NYPD to investigate and if they discover than the marine was a raging white supremacist just waiting for his chance then yeah prosecute him, based on what I (and you) know then I'm still leaning to the tragic accident pov.

You miss the point I think.

I'm old and decrepit now, but I could still take someone down and restrain them without using a choke hold.

Soldiers are taught unarmed combat, the marine should not have used a choke hold.
 
Personally I would prefer that people get involved rather than not and if sometimes a mistake is made then that is a tragedy but that doesn't mean people should turn a blind eye.
It's easy from the convenience of thousands of miles away and several days later for people to say X should have done/not done this not so if you're there at the time.

It seems like there was a failure to get involved here as well - people either stood by and watched or joined in as the ex-Marine choked the life out of a mentally ill Black man.

The case raises questions about how people respond to the actions of the “poor, the unhoused and most especially those perceived as suffering from mental illness,” said Christopher Fee, an English professor at Gettysburg College who teaches about homelessness.

“Those bystanders may have felt threatened by the victim, but they were not in fact attacked by him,” he said. “Still, they watched him die.”


 
I was a witness to a man trying to break the (locked) doors of a Tesco Express on my 2nd night back (they were locked because of his appalling behaviour).

You must live a very sheltered life cos I have seen/and do see this stuff all the time in my corner of Little England.
All the time? And yet a week ago you said you had just got back to the UK for the first time in years.
 
Remember seeing it quite a fair bit, the so called care in the community replacing the treatment of mentally ill people.

On the completely un medicated scale you see in the states or when people are in crisis in hospitals ( or horrendously police stations) . I’ve not.
 
Impossible for me to see my corner of Little England when I’m not there, but when I am there (you pedantic wet-wipe) I see that kind of behaviour all the time.
 
You miss the point I think.

I'm old and decrepit now, but I could still take someone down and restrain them without using a choke hold.

Soldiers are taught unarmed combat, the marine should not have used a choke hold.

TBF there is a lot of difference between what people are taught and what people end up using when confronted with a situation, especially if the situation is completely dissimilar to how they were trained - plus this isn't unarmed combat (indeed it could be the case that thinking he could use those skills is what has helped cause this tragedy), its restraint of someone apparently suffering from mental health problems. I'd be amazed if he (the marine) had been trained in that, unless he had some medical specialization or previous / current employment in that field.

Restraining people is not easy, especially for a single person to accomplish and against someone in some form of crisis it is nearly impossible to do physically.
 
EDIT: Just shared probably too much info that isn't mine to share and thought better of it.

This is horrific though. There is no excuse for restraining someone in that way (safer ways of restraining if someone is actually a physical threat to people).
 
Last edited:
I remember in Hong Kong i’d overheard a re-telling of an incident that occurred the night before, by one Caucasian North American to another (who wasn’t there).

The police in an attempt to restrain somebody (can’t remember if they mentioned what he had done or not) had choked a guy out until he died. During the re-telling though this person was described every time as a: black guy, a black guy with dreadlocks, a big black guy with deadlocks.

Whatever the fuck assumed knowledge they had on their mind against black people was probably something similar to what UFC Garfunkel (check the picture of the fuzzy haired cunt) had had on his mind about them.
 
Almost $800,000 has been raised for the Subway Strangler with the help of far-right politicians like Ron DeSantis, who calls him a "Good Samaritan."

I'm a little rusty on my Bible knowledge but I'm pretty sure the parable of the Good Samaritan doesn't involve the Samaritan killing somebody who was begging for food.
 
"Neely, once a talented Michael Jackson impersonator, had suffered PTSD and severe depression after his mother was murdered by his stepfather in 2007, when Neely was 14. He also had autism and developed schizophrenia, relatives said. He suffered a series of mental health crises and faced multiple arrests while living on the streets."

The murderer will get off no doubt.
 
Neely has priors and the defense will play on the self-defence angle. Kind of looks like it could go the same way as the 1984 Bernhard Goetz trial.
 
Also others were involved in the 'restraint'.

Screenshot 2023-05-13 at 16.03.22.png
 
Last edited:
Almost $800,000 has been raised for the Subway Strangler with the help of far-right politicians like Ron DeSantis, who calls him a "Good Samaritan."

I'm a little rusty on my Bible knowledge but I'm pretty sure the parable of the Good Samaritan doesn't involve the Samaritan killing somebody who was begging for food.
Would they have raised the money if he was black? I think we all know the answer.
 
Back
Top Bottom