Idris2002
Stay Alive in '25
Incest for breakfast, incest for lunch, and then a proper dinner.Is that your only demand?
Incest for breakfast, incest for lunch, and then a proper dinner.Is that your only demand?
I was gutted they didn't wear power armour like the book.
Robocop wasn't predicting anything, it was a satire of what what going on in right then in the 80s with corporations and the privatisation of public services. The intention of Starship Troopers was never to predict anything. It was a satire of totalitarian regimes informed by Verhoeven's experience of growing up in Holland under Nazi occupation. It was projecting the past into the future.
Guess I was trying to say its more along the lines of you can't reboot the franchise or remake them because todays society makes some of the stuff in the film look sensible.
I have no idea what you are on about.
That's only because Hollywood films are more shit now, not because of today's society.tl:dr the new Robocop was fucking shit and flat and wasn't able to use the same satire.
..and James Cameron nicked the M.I. suit idea for Aliens, which was strongly influenced by Heinlein's Starship troopers.
The Fanny monster?Who else genuinely felt just a tiny bit sad and sorry for the alien monster maggot thing at the end when they were being nasty to it and it was scared
I've just remembered Job: A Comedy of Justice. Heinlein the atheist's take on what a divine war might /actually/ be all about. Fucking brilliant.
Seriously, if you are at all into a Sci-Fi, you should read a good half-dozen of his books,
Its amazing, seriously.
edit: Actually its a bit disturbing looking back, you know how Verhoeven basically predicted modern life and corporate shitness back with Robocop? Well he did the same with Starship Troopers and modern jingoism and military fetishism. Guys a fucking seer.
so is this satire too?
The book is very, very different. And not satire. The film is just one chapter of the book.
Oh, he was right mental. He was really, really anti-big state, though. So he was also criticising militarism in Starship Troopers. But it isn't satire, it's more direct than that.It's Heinlein isn't it? All sorts of dodgy shit in his oeuvre.
I tried Stranger In A Strange Land and found it unreadable. I was about 18 though.
and then have a good long showerI've just remembered Job: A Comedy of Justice. Heinlein the atheist's take on what a divine war might /actually/ be all about. Fucking brilliant.
Seriously, if you are at all into a Sci-Fi, you should read a good half-dozen of his books,
yes. Every time. When they drag it into the light squealing and the psi corp man say 'it's scared'Who else genuinely felt just a tiny bit sad and sorry for the alien monster maggot thing at the end when they were being nasty to it and it was scared
Half way though the film, in a throw away line it's revealed that the humans were the aggressors, having started the war with the bugs, so I think you are supposed to feel a little sorry for them.
the ultimate fanny monster is from Dune, the guild navigatorThe Fanny monster?
Oh, he was right mental. He was really, really anti-big state, though. So he was also criticising militarism in Starship Troopers. But it isn't satire, it's more direct than that.
I tell you what, though. You can certainly raise many eyebrows at Heinlein, and his views of women are odd, to make a large understatement. But on that score at least, he was writing of future societies in which women were at least fundamentally *equal* to men in terms of abilities, intelligence and status and was doing so in the 1940s and 50s, at a time at which things he wrote about that we now would view as normal would at the time have been scoffed at. He may have been barking up the wrong tree about many things but there are certainly some ways in which he was a genuine social visionary.
I think this is not an accurate description of his weirdness. His books are obsessed wth relationships between 20-something women and 60-something men, not adults and children.He was an articulate nonce mate. He was a humbert humbert for the modern age. You like all the wrong sci fi.
I think this is not an accurate description of his weirdness. His books are obsessed wth relationships between 20-something women and 60-something men, not adults and children.
Oh yeah, and he also fucking loved the polygamy.don't forget the incest