BigMoaner
What A Load of Old Bollocks
where's that?Antic going to William Stanley.
where's that?Antic going to William Stanley.
Posts like this make me pleased they chose south Norwood not Thornton heath.If this (Antic)is true it's great news and a chance to really start rebuilding the area and move on all the dross that drink there now. A good pub will bring in better restaurants than the chicken shacks we have now and other shops like Crystal Palace. After seeing a steady decline in South Norwood in the thirty odd years I've lived here the grass roots of recovery are at last being seen such as the regeneration work, the local community support for Stanley Halls and many other examples. I'd love to see a gentrified South Norwood it has the potential with wonderful housing stock and great transport links.
Good troll attemptNot rich but I've worked hard for what I've got perhaps if a few more adopted that ethic and stopped expecting the Govt to support them we might all be better off. London needs to and does evolve otherwise we'd still be living in Victorian slums (No doubt the rich and the bankers were to blame for those as well!)
How many local Croydon people do you think are buying the high rise new apartments in Croydon? 300k+ for a 1 bed flat.So Miss-Shelf what do you propose? No regeneration and just let the area decline? The regeneration can bring more housing with it and can be a mix of housing associations and home ownership.Just look at the housing being built in Croydon as an example. I must admit I'm not a great fan of high rise especially having lived in council flat in the past but like in Hong Kong it's the only answer with high populations and limited space. Come into the real world Miss-Shelf and allow those hard working people to have their own homes
but you were saying you wanted the area gentrified which means the end result is just a tiny portion of hte local population can live there and inevitably move out.So Miss-Shelf what do you propose? No regeneration and just let the area decline? The regeneration can bring more housing with it and can be a mix of housing associations and home ownership.Just look at the housing being built in Croydon as an example. I must admit I'm not a great fan of high rise especially having lived in council flat in the past but like in Hong Kong it's the only answer with high populations and limited space. Come into the real world Miss-Shelf and allow those hard working people to have their own homes
There's only a certain type who wishes for gentrification, I.e. Abusive house prices, businesses that serve such folk who can afford to live there. What south Norwood needs is a bloody good scrub and more house proud folk who don't use their front gardens as rubbish tips...sooner that than 600k for a three bed, a few coffee bars and restaurants - no thanks. You know some of us have a vague hope that our kids might one day live locally or that, gasp, one might even one day get a bigger property in the same area instead forever being pushed out to Crawley and the like!
So funnySo Miss-Shelf what do you propose? No regeneration and just let the area decline? The regeneration can bring more housing with it and can be a mix of housing associations and home ownership.Just look at the housing being built in Croydon as an example. I must admit I'm not a great fan of high rise especially having lived in council flat in the past but like in Hong Kong it's the only answer with high populations and limited space. Come into the real world Miss-Shelf and allow those hard working people to have their own homes
So funny
Improving an area by improving the lives and life chances of the people living there is great. Pricing the poorest out of the area to replace them with richer people isn't really an improvement overall. The poor are still poor just shunted about and crammed into ever shittier accommodation, or the street.
But you both know that anyway, little troll twins.
There seems to be a theme on here if calling anybody with a different viewpoint a troll.
And it's pretty basic.
Improving an area by improving the lives and life chances of the people living there is great. Pricing the poorest out of the area to replace them with richer people isn't really an improvement overall. The poor are still poor just shunted about and crammed into ever shittier accommodation, or the street.
But you both know that anyway, little troll twins.
Have you given up on the students occupy… thread where you appear to not be able to discuss/respond to points properly?