Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Say hello to Barratt Homes' 'Brixton Square' on Coldharbour Lane (old Cooltan site)

An urbanite got one of those shared ownership 1-beds and I've been there. Double aspect flat with a decent amount of space and a great view. The balconies clash with the entrances but otherwise it's ok looking. Excellent efficiency rating too.

IIRC they're some kind of prefabricated Scandinavian design? What are the windows like when you're actually inside?
 
IIRC they're some kind of prefabricated Scandinavian design? What are the windows like when you're actually inside?
The bedroom's a bit gloomy, but the lounge/kitchen runs all the way front to back with a balcony on each end. Plenty of light.
 
I'd like more social and affordable housing too. I'm commenting on the outward appearance of the Coldharbour Lane block; in my view it is lumpen and inelegant (which need not be inevitable for system-built architecture; it simply requires the application of some design skills, little of which seem in evidence in that building, at least outwardy).

The Barratts block is mediocre architecturally, but I would say it takes a less aggressive approach to the streetscape. The gated courtyard is a bit of a red herring as has been discussed in endless circles on this thread already..

image.jpg

How very kind of Barratts to give us a welcome pack, don't suppose anyone want two barratt mugs !(no jokes please) btw they have dropped the words BRIXTON SQUARE from the address, there is no signage saying BS and we have been told not to use it In the address. STRANGE.
By the way I think the new housing blocks (student housing??) either side of the Sainsburys in Herne Hill are actually starting to look quite good. They, I think, are based on prefab modules as well, but a bit more thought has been put into the appearance of the facades
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's a massive metal gate. How is it suddenly going to become more attractive?

Oh, I don't know. But perhaps this?

images
 
Barratts' Mug Strategy worked: the people of urban75 have been distracted from the fight against the capitalist corporations and are now reduced to posting pictures of their knowingly ironic mugs, thus revealing their true priorities.
 
Embassy Apartments (social housing)
View attachment 43282

Those balconies always make me think of Lego.

WwEC4Cg.jpg

I didn't know that it was social housing - that's great. But I agree with teuchter, it really isn't a great-looking building - it's like they've tried to do an International Style/Bauhaus sort of thing, but gone too far with the minimalism and ended up with a white box. For me, adding some personality to those bland windows with sills and lintels would do wonders.
 
Barratts' Mug Strategy worked: the people of urban75 have been distracted from the fight against the capitalist corporations and are now reduced to posting pictures of their knowingly ironic mugs, thus revealing their true priorities.
I'm not sure that I am particularly strong evidence that such distraction techniques are effective against the intended distractees.

And, come to think of it, I lied. I also have a 1953 coronation mug found in a cellar.
 
Those balconies always make me think of Lego.

WwEC4Cg.jpg

I didn't know that it was social housing - that's great. But I agree with teuchter, it really isn't a great-looking building - it's like they've tried to do an International Style/Bauhaus sort of thing, but gone too far with the minimalism and ended up with a white box. For me, adding some personality to those bland windows with sills and lintels would do wonders.
When did Lego go that colour?

There is a lot of work goes into detailing good minimalism, which is not evident in this case. Simplism, perhaps?

That said, I don't mind it. I quite like the fact it is somewhat unapologetic.
 
When did Lego go that colour?

There is a lot of work goes into detailing good minimalism, which is not evident in this case.

Lego lost the plot when it stopped being simple bricks and turned into complicated dioramas with bespoke components.
 
Barratts' Mug Strategy worked: the people of urban75 have been distracted from the fight against the capitalist corporations and are now reduced to posting pictures of their knowingly ironic mugs, thus revealing their true priorities.
< awaits renaming of thread as "Brixton Square News gossip and general chit chat">
 
Those balconies always make me think of Lego.

WwEC4Cg.jpg

I didn't know that it was social housing - that's great. But I agree with teuchter, it really isn't a great-looking building - it's like they've tried to do an International Style/Bauhaus sort of thing, but gone too far with the minimalism and ended up with a white box. For me, adding some personality to those bland windows with sills and lintels would do wonders.
That's "Value Bauhaus". But I still prefer it to Barratts house style.
I guess it's all a matter of taste. You don't like Stockhausen either do you?
 
But I agree with teuchter, it really isn't a great-looking building - it's like they've tried to do an International Style/Bauhaus sort of thing, but gone too far with the minimalism and ended up with a white box.

What they have done is:
-Designed a unit
-Put some malproportioned windows into it in the way that was least complicated in their CAD programme, and that satisfied regulations with the minimum amount of thought on the part of the "designer"
-Multiply by 100
-Put units in stacks
-Realise it just looks like an ugly stack of ugly things
-Tried to counter this by mirroring some window/balcony arrangements on alternate floors
-Filled inbetween the stacks with service towers, which have to be higher than the stacks due to lift machine rooms, and thought "oh well they'll just be a bit higher, then, like it''s some kind of hunchbacked monster, we'll not bother to try and articulate it or anything"
-Put stupid circular windows in the stair towers for no good reason
-Squashed in some ugly yellow entrance way things at the bottom of the stair towers
-Realised it all looks pretty lumpen and imposing, so rendered it all white (except for the bits that are purply blue which was inspired by something they saw in Mothercare)
-Had a bit of an afterthought about I don't know what, and put whatever it was in some big yellow windowless boxes at ground level wherever there was some space
-Realised that their entire "concept" makes no allowance for what happens when their standard boxes meet ground level and the street, but but some balconies on there anyway
-Realised it's kind of stupid to have a projecting balcony at street level where someone could just jump onto it from the pavement, so countered this by sticking a big spiky galvanised fence along the pavement (now the lucky people with their ground level balconies can look at the back of a fence)
-Realised it's not particularly nice to have a big spiky galvanised fence all along the street so tried to disguise this by getting some public art stuck on it.

This monstrosity doesn't deserve to be associated with the words Bauhaus, Modernism, Minimalism, Design or Architecture.

But yeah I'm totally relaxed about it really.
 
The name "Brixton Square" has probably been dropped partly because it brings up this highly critical discussion if you Google it. Therefore, keep tweeting it, forum-ing it, and saying it.

Don't think so, it's very common for the marketing names of these developments to be just that - marketing names. They're usually dropped when the properties are sold and given the proper address which was always intended.
 
They taken down some of the fencing so i no longer have to peek behind it. It's just boarded up store fronts, a pavement and playing space where I guessing hedges will go.
 
Back
Top Bottom