Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Save Lambeth Libraries and the Carnegie Library occupation

Got into a conversation yesterday with a Lambeth Labour councillor in a pub in Clapham (as one does).
He and his friend were delightful - but what struck me (since I initiated the conversation by making a challenging remark about the libraries) was that the councillor is a true believer in the GLL deal. No ifs, no buts. Almost like a vicar running the Alpha course.

I'm wondering what can be done now - except wait and see what happens. I don't see any change from the current councillors - short of Momentum engineering mass de-selections. Even then what is Momentum's policy on libraries?

It appears from what has been said in postings above that the current Labour council's policy on Carnegie is to get in so deep to the GLL transfer and building work that it is impossible to cancel. Back in 1992 that type of reckless behaviour might have been referred to as "corruption".
 
Here's how the library looks now:

carnegie-library-nov-2017-03.jpg


carnegie-library-nov-2017-06.jpg


carnegie-library-nov-2017-08.jpg


Lambeth’s shame: photos of the still-closed Carnegie Library, November 2017
 
The cod-library opened yesterday

YOUR HANDY GUIDE TO TODAY's "RE-OPENING" OF CARNEGIE LIBRARY, HERNE HILL


STORY SO FAR

Carnegie Library - the busiest children's library in Lambeth, with usage by all age groups increasing annually in double figures - was closed on 1 April 2016.

Endless protests ignored.

The idea - to shrink the library to a fraction of its size, remove all staff and instal a fee-charging gym in the building (which is surrounded by gyms).


TODAY

The library has been closed until today - 15 February 2018. Almost 2 years.

A "neighbourhood library" has now opened with - big concession - library staff to help users for just 2 hours a day.

The gym is nowhere near ready. Noisy building work will continue until autumn 2018.

The garden has been ruined to take in ventilation plant and a garish new entrance for the gym.


IN TIME FOR COUNCIL ELECTIONS, THE FAKE NEW LIBRARY OPENED TODAY


PRESENT: over 100 protesters, including many of those who occupied the building in April 2016 in a last-ditch attempt to divert Lambeth council from its hated plan to spend millions installing an unwanted fee-charging gym.


ABSENT:

- council leader Lib Peck;

- any of the 3 local councillors - who all voted for the plan despite hundreds of objections;

- any of the secretive three-member "trust" due to be handed the building for purposes never shared with local people.



OBSERVED: by UNISON reps & bemused local people -

- sole fire door jammed shut (if open it would lead through a building site)

- no disabled access (wheelchairs, prams etc must mount flight of steps

- entrance shared with building workers carrying equipment & materials

- no heating

- sole public toilet overlooked by nearby houses, and drains waste into the kitchen sink

- building noise

- uncomfortable levels of dust.


KNOWN:

The library has been set up in the beautiful main library room - but within weeks it will all be crammed into the much smaller front room (currently under extensive repairs because council neglect during closure allowed water to flooding, again and again).


UNKNOWN:

Final cost.

Lambeth council claims the gym scheme is needed to cope with government cuts. Cost so far, over the near 2 years the Carnegie has been closed:

- £3m to dig out basement to instal the unwanted gym.

- £200,000 on security guards (here & at nearby closed Minet library)

- All the costs the closed libraries still had to pay for rates, utilities, insurance etc.

- £200,000 cost of using Lambeth funds to compensate for use of the gym rent-free for 5 years by Greenwich Leisure Ltd (in a building the council owns!). In a deal that remains secret.

- £120,000 loss of income from businesses renting space in the Carnegie library - thrown out with no notice

- Cost of relocating the extensive library back-up services (stock dept & storage, home delivery service etc) formerly operating rent-free in Carnegie building

- ?£100,000 cost of setting up and supporting project group that has morphed into the council-friendly "Carnegie Community Trust" - three self-appointed trustees, no voting members, no involvement with the community, which is due to be given the building as an asset transfer.

- cost of consultants to analyse - and reject - rival bid from Carnegie Library Association, which has nine elected trustees, 300+ voting members including long-established Friends of Carnegie Library, local amenity societies & all the community groups that used the library... and has held 3 public meetings that approved its aim to restore a full library service.
 
Read the recent posts here. I'm none the wiser about what GLL/ Council see as the end result. I don't mean a criticism of the posts or Brixton Buzz articles. It's the relationship between GLL and Council that I find concerning.

GLL run library services in other boroughs. I am wondering if them providing "customer care assistant" is step towards them starting take over library services? I can see why Unison is saying that the customer care assistant jobs are really librarian jobs and should be covered by TUPE arrangements.

I also cannot see how the Carnegie Community Trust will work in conjunction with GLL gym and GLL "customer care assistant".

I do know that the Council hasn't set up separate contract with GLL to run the gym/ library. It's doing it, somehow under the existing Leisure contract that GLL has to run the existing Leisure centres.

The whole process has not been transparent. Discussions between senior officers and GLL have only been brought to light through the People's Audit and FOI request.
 
I do know that the Council hasn't set up separate contract with GLL to run the gym/ library. It's doing it, somehow under the existing Leisure contract that GLL has to run the existing Leisure centres.
There were a couple of "Better" staff around at the reopening of the Carnegie on Thursday. The same two who were a my doctors surgery patients meeting before Christmas saying how exercise was good for you but were unable to say how much it would cost as everyone's exercise plan is different.

They are obviously very versatile at customer relations situations - and with the capability to be obscure, maybe a job promoting Dual fuel plans or internet packages in Camberwell shopping centre beckons?
 
Some photos of the current arrangement at the library. I did go into the main room but didn't want to take photos with people in there. Staff seemed to amount to two security men, plus the two-hours-a-day librarian (although with no librarian desk as such that I could see, it wasn't very obvious who the libararian is). There was a scattering of people in there using it, including a few schoolkids. The door to the reading garden is blocked off with bookshelves.

Screen Shot 2018-04-17 at 17.39.21.jpg


Screen Shot 2018-04-17 at 17.39.31.jpg

Screen Shot 2018-04-17 at 17.39.43.jpg

The steel frame of the new reception / entrance seems to be up. The hoardings are carefully constructed to ensure no holes to look through and see what has happened to the ex-reading garden area.

Screen Shot 2018-04-17 at 17.39.59.jpg

It's true as far as I can see that there's no level access at the moment. So if you can't get up the steps, you aren't getting in.
 
I had a look at the pdf " contract award"

This came up:


1.5 The total cost of redeveloping Carnegie Library, including both Phase 1 and 2, is projected at £2.8m.
The funding for this award is comprised of £2m of Capital Receipts and £800,000 from the joint
proceeds of the profit share agreement between LB Lambeth and Greenwich Leisure Ltd (GLL) via
the Council's Leisure Contract.

The reference to the profit share via Council Leisure Contact is about the existing leisure contract.

GLL/ Better have a leisure contract with Lambeth to run the existing leisure centres like Brixton Rec.

Apart from Ferndale the rest of the leisure centres like the Rec make a surplus. Council officers normally call it surplus. Hear they call it profit share. As though it's like private company.

So my reading of the pdf is that that some of the surplus from existing leisure centres is being diverted to the gym library experiment.

This has been done with no consultation with existing users of leisure centres. This surplus / profit whatever you want to call it is from all the membership fees paid by users. And it isn't that cheap.

Money should not be diverted in this way. (£ 800 000). It should be invested in existing centres.
 
Back
Top Bottom