Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Roald Dahl's Books Being Altered

Changing the work of authors from the past

  • It's right to change *most/all* potentially non-inclusive/offensive literature from the past.

    Votes: 1 2.7%
  • It's right to change potentially non-inclusive/offensive *child* literature from the past.

    Votes: 6 16.2%
  • Edits are ok for current literature but great past authors' work is sacred/should remain untouched

    Votes: 30 81.1%

  • Total voters
    37
And, crucially, the original versions are still available, I reckon it's not too wildly tinfoil hat to speculate about the possibility that the plan was always to keep the original versions in print and to get free publicity that'll probably help the sales of both editions. Pick your culture war flavour.
 
I suspect the publishers are running ahead of opinion but probably not by much and no doubt they do focus groups and whatnot.
It's not really public opinion they are interested in, but in not losing those readers who might be lost, even if it's a minority.
 
It's not really public opinion they are interested in, but in not losing those readers who might be lost, even if it's a minority.
If it is a minority, aren't they more likely to be affected by a frustrated majority?
 
I suspect that the majority really don't care either way. An energised minority among the majority can always buy their 'heritage editions'. Great way to sell the same thing twice. Hence they will not be displeased by all this publicity - nobody else is allowed to publish Dahl's work in any version at all. ;)
 
I suspect that the majority really don't care either way. An energised minority among the majority can always buy their 'heritage editions'. Great way to sell the same thing twice. Hence they will not be displeased by all this publicity - nobody else is allowed to publish Dahl's work in any version at all. ;)
I think the minority of the majority might not be just content with access to 'heritage editions' but fight for wider concerns they have for literature. But who knows - perhaps you're right.

If you're wrong then it's the minority v the minority of the majority.

But, tbh, not sure you've framed the whole thing correctly anyway. I think more than a minority of the majority care.
 
We'll see. I suspect that they've probably judged it pretty well tbh. They couldn't have hoped for better publicity than having the Prime Minister wading in.

It's still not censorship. :p
 
4661.png
 
Back
Top Bottom