Research respondents needed from Brighton- nightlife/lapdance survey

[lizzieloo]

supermarketers would pay market researchers
librarians would (usually) commossion academics (unless they were doing it internally)
child minders & teachers would be more likely to chat about their experience (as opposed to CONDUCT research on child minding and teaching). teacher training college are staffed by academic educationalists who do the research that gets taught.

I'm now doing that thing I used to do in primary school, you know, when you shove your tongue in between your teeth and lip, not terribly constructive but you have backed my brain into a small tucked away dark place right at the back of my head.

 

[lizzieloo]

I have no idea what you're talking about. I understand the FAQ fine, I just think there's an obvious exception to it which, given the excipted group in question aren't welcome, it would be nice to actually say this explicitly rather than just start rounding on people when they get here.

What happens if someone else not on the (new updated) list does the same thing?

 

[nosos]

Er, ok...

 

[nosos]

What happens if someone else not on the (new updated) list does the same thing?

You mean someone who isn't on the list?

 

[lizzieloo]

OH MY GOD!

*RUNS AWAY, SCREAMING*

 

[nosos]

I'm sorry I clearly didn't understand your far from clear question. If you explain what you were asking I can try again...?

 

[nosos]

Or alternatively you could just tell me what the fuck your point is because I have no idee and I've stated many continuously.

 

[lizzieloo]

You smell.

 

[bi0boy]

I'm sorry I clearly didn't understand your far from clear question. If you explain what you were asking I can try again...?

How about those people who think they aren't posting spam but a great opportunity to make genuine product savings, should we specifically exclude that in the FAQ?

What about those people who don't even read the FAQ that is displayed when signing up, as I suspect was the case with the OP, despite your best efforts to convince yourself otherwise.

 

[nosos]

Nope of course I'm saying they should be excluded from the FAQ. I'm saying academic researchers should be included in the FAQ. They're not welcome so make it explicitly clear.

 

[lizzieloo]

 

[nosos]

Yeah I really can't give a shit by this point in the conversation. Sigh.

 

[Corax]

Any idea why she wants to ask people in Brighton about the Scottish lapdancing industry though nosos? It has me intrigued.

 

[bi0boy]

Nope of course I'm saying they should be excluded from the FAQ. I'm saying academic researchers should be included in the FAQ. They're not welcome so make it explicitly clear.

Did the OP actually read it anyway? I presume not or they would have noticed the bit about hanging around to get a feel of the place before posting.

 

[nosos]

Yes. And given this thread I have absolutely no desire to reveal personal information her or about the project.

 

[bi0boy]

Yes. And given this thread I have absolutely no desire to reveal personal information her or about the project.

But she comes on here asking for our postcodes

 

[nosos]

Did the OP actually read it anyway? I presume not or they would have noticed the bit about hanging around to get a feel of the place before posting.

Speculating about what a new poster you all scared off did or didn't do has zero relevance to my suggestion about the slight change to the FAQ.

 

[bi0boy]

Speculating about what a new poster you all scared off did or didn't do has zero relevance to my suggestion about the slight change to the FAQ.

It does, because your suggestion is based on the premise that she read the FAQ but didn't understand it.

 

[nosos]

My suggestion is that (a) urban75 doesn't want academic researchers posting requests for participants on their boards (b) the current FAQ does not explicitly say this (c) therefore it's addition would be helpful for the cohesion of the community.

 

[nosos]

And I'm really fucking bored of this stupid tit-for-tat argument we have got sucked into. It's exactly the reason I stopped posting here in the first fucking place. I got pissed you were rude to my friend but let's agree to disagree about how justified that was. The suggestion in post above is meant in good faith. I do think this'll happen again unless you make the fact academics are excluded more explicit.

 

[lizzieloo]

 

[bi0boy]

And I'm really fucking bored of this stupid tit-for-tat argument we have got sucked into. It's exactly the reason I stopped posting here in the first fucking place. I got pissed you were rude to my friend but let's agree to disagree about how justified that was. The suggestion in post above is meant in good faith. I do think this'll happen again unless you make the fact academics are excluded more explicit.

See post 66

 

[nosos]

yeah as i said that time, listing the one other group likely to turn up with surveys is not the same thing as having to list any possible scenario

 

[bi0boy]

/thread

 

[lizzieloo]

It's obvious from the FAQs that wouldn't be welcome, only an idiot wouldn't be able to suss that out from what is already there.

Did your mate read the FAQs?

 

[nosos]

The FAQ doesn't include academic research in the list of things that aren't welcome - how therefore is it obvious that this isn't welcome?

 

[nosos]

Fwiw I teach students to ALWAYS approach the moderator of a site before posting a request. Not everyone has been taught this and not everyone is familiar with online culture.

 

[ddraig]

 

[lizzieloo]

The FAQ doesn't include academic research in the list of things that aren't welcome - how therefore is it obvious that this isn't welcome?

It's obvious that lazy reasearch isn't welcome.

By whoever, whatever job they do.

*Loses the will to live*

You HAVE to be on a wind up here.

 

[lizzieloo]

I'm starting to feel like I've had opiates.