Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Reclaim Brixton movement - meetings and April 25th protest planned

It's not quite that simple. It's a bit more complex than that. And would be nice to think that some efforts to challenge aspects of this change might have some impact. We are in a much better position than the Victorian poor were.

The problem is this movement of those who can't afford it isn't just in Brixton but across London so even if people look to settle in new spaces unless they can buy somewhere they will be moved on.

Social housing is a large part of the basis of "we" being in a better position. Unfortunately it's something that local government is desperate to undermine in pursuit of building new homes which won't actually be social housing, but rather subject to the whims of whoever owns or co-owns the SPV built to finance the demolition of social housing for the construction of not-social housing.
 
Either this bloke writing in PROSPECT magazine doesn't understand what gentrification is either, or I've lost the plot in this narrative some time ago:

http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/blogs/jay-elwes/brixton-regained

it's well enough written but I don't think I agree with a word it says! "gentrification doesn't cause house prices to rise, it's the other way round" - eh?
Not it's their argument, but there is a point in that the current round of gentrification in London is outside of the usual feedback loop which we've seen in the past.

Previously you would get an area becoming trendy and more desirable, richer people buying property there, rents going up because of that and forcing out older residents and businesses, and average prices increasing so that the minimum level is raised even higher and so on and so on. That's certainly happened in the past in Brixton.

OTOH now in London we just have all property going massively up in price no matter where it is. This causes similar social effects simply because of the money involved but it's harder to stop given that prices are going up for reasons outside of the usual loop.
 
Social housing is a large part of the basis of "we" being in a better position. Unfortunately it's something that local government is desperate to undermine in pursuit of building new homes which won't actually be social housing, but rather subject to the whims of whoever owns or co-owns the SPV built to finance the demolition of social housing for the construction of not-social housing.

Yes - something that came about at the end of the VIctorian era and looks set to be eroded even more than it has been over the next ten, twenty (however long it takes to totally destroy it).

There is a real sense of the 'normal' people really not mattering.
 
Online booth maps are really interesting and his comments ( if you can read the handwriting)

I've read Mayhew, and have looked at Booth's maps, although with both I'm always a bit deterred by the "well-meaning do-gooder" tone, IYSWIM. Booth's maps, though, were probably the first meaningful piece of what's now called "human geography" in the UK, and certainly set the cat among the pigeons!
 
You can kind of date it into 3 (somewhat overlapping) blocks,to my way of thinking, which is the "Bohemian" (for want of a better all-round term) block of settlement where the squatters and the "arty types" colonised Brixton because it was cheap, cheerful and inclusive. You could roughly date this from the '70s until the mid-'90s, and it included people buying because you could still get "bang for buck" in terms of the number of bedrooms your money would buy, if you didn't mind some of the local peculiarities.
You then had a "mainstreaming" block, which you could date from the early '90s to around 2012, where Brixton became more of a mainstream housing destination for people not deterred by folk-myth and hysteria, where a lot of people bought or rented because it made financial sense to, and who came to love the local cultures. As with the previous block, this was fairly slow and steady, although it also saw the loss (to development) of several community assets such as Cooltan.
From roughly 2010-ish (would probably have been a little earlier but for das finanzkreis) gentrification has hyper-accelerated. rather than the "slow and steady" change of the previous two blocks - which although they displaced people, tended to displace to nearby locales - gentrification in Lambeth in general - and Brixton in particular - has been fast and brutal, with the local authority leading the way in that brutality with the clearance/eviction of short-life tenants from suddenly-valuable town-centre properties, and the minimisation of their obligations to those they displaced. Speculative buying of property is also a borough-wide (and city-wide) problem, as is the development of "luxury homes" for sale - it changes expectations and markets. What has also driven this is the realisation by various commercial entities of those changed expectations, and their attempts (as diverse as Lexadon's property rentals and Shrub & Shutter's cocktails in a jamjar) to cash in on it. Short-termist profit-making is triumphing over long-term community interests and needs - Brixton is being made over in the image of a group of people who have little interest in the place or the communities, only in the profits realisable, or the social capital accrued from living somewhere "edgy".

The above is a fairly well-simplified overview.
Do you think that Brixton needs reclaiming from all these Bohemians, arty types and gentrifiers?
Should I pack my bags now?
 
TBF, I'm not making my argument for that particular poster, but for the slightly-less emptyheaded readers who may come later. :)

So less rudeness on the end so that they read your sensible and interesting addition to the conversation rather than get irritated at your ranty bit. :)
 
I've read Mayhew, and have looked at Booth's maps, although with both I'm always a bit deterred by the "well-meaning do-gooder" tone, IYSWIM. Booth's maps, though, were probably the first meaningful piece of what's now called "human geography" in the UK, and certainly set the cat among the pigeons!

I don't mind the "well-meaning do gooder" bit - many of these people did set out to help poorer people - because they felt it was their godly duty - but I think I prefer that over and above this current batch of rich people who overall really don't give a toss.
 
I've read Mayhew, and have looked at Booth's maps, although with both I'm always a bit deterred by the "well-meaning do-gooder" tone, IYSWIM. Booth's maps, though, were probably the first meaningful piece of what's now called "human geography" in the UK, and certainly set the cat among the pigeons!
the soho cholera map
 
Do you think that Brixton needs reclaiming from all these Bohemians, arty types and gentrifiers?
Should I pack my bags now?

I think Brixton needs reclaiming from speculators and those out to make a quick buck. it doesn't need reclaiming from people who love Brixton and contribute to its' communities, but rather from those who seek to profit by commodifying the Brixton we (those who love it) helped make.
 
I suggest you get some books out about local history, look on urban, talk to the Brixton society, visit the archives. You clearly have a passion for this investigation into history. I recommend Dyos' book on the Victorian suburb about Camberwell. An excellent account of how London developed certainly in one area.

Then come back and tell us what you have learned.
Brilliant.
 
For all I know it might have also happened in previous 'eras' of gentrification, but what is criminal this time around is that social housing seems to be deliberately being targeted by the very government bodies in charge of looking after it. There appears to be a conscious effort to replace much of the existing vital social housing with private dwellings to whom the majority of social tenants will have no economic means to get access to, and who likely be offered accommodation far away from the area and community they've lived in for many years.

The more visible and much-talked about signs of gentrification- such as the arrival of 'hipster' types to the area and upmarket shops and bars opening up- are in my view both a consequence not a cause, and a distraction not really worth wasting time about. I'm aware many disagree with this sentiment. But the plight of social tenants as a direct result of Lambeth's plans in collusion with property developers is a scandal about which all of us who are not property developers should be united on.
 
Yes - something that came about at the end of the VIctorian era and looks set to be eroded even more than it has been over the next ten, twenty (however long it takes to totally destroy it).

There is a real sense of the 'normal' people really not mattering.

In my purely-personal opinion, the "death of politics" (well, credible party politics) has meant that "normal people" have far less leverage on govt (and especially local govt) than they had 30 years ago, and this in turn has allowed a species of glib semi-professional hucksters to permeate the wards - a type exemplified by Steve Reed - rather than the traditional fare of civic-minded people wanting to do their bit, with just one or two power-hungry knobbers per party. This being the case, we don't matter, because the only influence we have is at best the power to vote them out at the end of the political cycle.
 
I think Brixton needs reclaiming from speculators and those out to make a quick buck. it doesn't need reclaiming from people who love Brixton and contribute to its' communities, but rather from those who seek to profit by commodifying the Brixton we (those who love it) helped make.
Would you want Brixton to be like it was 10 years a go needing a bit of TLC. Politics a side at least money is being spent to preserve the buildings and architecture
 
I can pm you a list of good London books which should give you an interested rounded view. Or come over for a cup of tea and I will take you through a teary eyed story of my childhood in Brixton in the 1980s... (I'm serious!!)
Let me start with the books....and I will let you know how I got on ;-)
 
For all I know it might have also happened in previous 'eras' of gentrification, but what is criminal this time around is that social housing seems to be deliberately being targeted by the very government bodies in charge of looking after it. There appears to be a conscious effort to replace much of the existing vital social housing with private dwellings to whom the majority of social tenants will have no economic means to get access to, and who likely be offered accommodation far away from the area and community they've lived in for many years.

The more visible and much-talked about signs of gentrification- such as the arrival of 'hipster' types to the area and upmarket shops and bars opening up- are in my view both a consequence not a cause, and a distraction not really worth wasting time about. I'm aware many disagree with this sentiment. But the plight of social tenants as a direct result of Lambeth's plans in collusion with property developers is a scandal about which all of us who are not property developers should be united on.
Agree 1000%. Cameron's recent offer of more right-to-buy was in my view the immoral and moronic low point of his premiership; his Blair-invading-Iraq moment.
 
I can pm you a list of good London books which should give you an interested rounded view. Or come over for a cup of tea and I will take you through a teary eyed story of my childhood in Brixton in the 1980s... (I'm serious!!)

Oops, shouldn't have called you "mum". If your childhood was in the '80s, you're younger than me!
 
I think its because you think you know every thing Panda. Maybe just maybe you dont

I don't think anything of the sort. I'm just old enough to have experienced a lot of life and to have taken on board the lessons I've been offered.
The fact that you offer up an "argument" about me thinking that I know everything says quite a bit more about you, than about me, though. Well done!
 
Would you want Brixton to be like it was 10 years a go needing a bit of TLC. Politics a side at least money is being spent to preserve the buildings and architecture
I recall Brixton was ok 10 years ago, but thats just my opinion. I'm not sure what is better now
I love urban architecture, I'm a townie, but I would ask who is preserving the buildings and for whom?
eg. If Lambeth was proposing demolishing Olive Morris House in order to build council houses, I doubt many people would be objecting. If network rail was renovating the arches for the benefit of their existing tenents, I doubt customers would have been out on saturday holding hands.
 
Back
Top Bottom