boohoo
No.
I read his book about the Pankhursts. it was..interesting.
His book on Women's history post 1915 is very good.
I read his book about the Pankhursts. it was..interesting.
I take it to mean "our" as in "the people's", not the power of capital etc
To the exclusion of property developers and those seeking to evict or exploit them, you div.
IMHO no.am I supposed to give a fuck about 2 teenagers with an aversion to walking being mildly inconvienced?
Capital, property developers and so on weren't listening. Capital can't listen, thinking of property developers as individuals, as people who listen, is pointless.
Those chants were aimed at, and heard by, people in Brixton, and it was quite plain that a claim was being staked "OUR Brixton".
If the target of the chanting had been Lambeth council, or Network Rail, or Foxtons then fine, no problem at all. Even general attacks on capital and stuff.
You seem to want to defend divisive chants by a small proportion of protestors, of whom there were only maybe a couple of thousand in total drawn from a population of hundreds of thousands. How do all the rest get engaged- by chanting that the area belongs to a few members of noisy subcultures. I don't think so.
Absolutely. It looks like things seem strange in Newbie World.I wasn't there, but I reckon you're over thinking it a bit.
It's pretty clearly based on the common chant "whose streets? our streets!" that happens at pretty much every demo. I think you are over-egging any "divisive" aspect here; "our" doesn't refer to any particular subset of people, it means people generally, and I'd be surprised if any significant number of listeners misunderstood that. I've not even seen that interpretation in the Mail etc.Capital, property developers and so on weren't listening. Capital can't listen, thinking of property developers as individuals, as people who listen, is pointless.
Those chants were aimed at, and heard by, people in Brixton, and it was quite plain that a claim was being staked "OUR Brixton".
If the target of the chanting had been Lambeth council, or Network Rail, or Foxtons then fine, no problem at all. Even general attacks on capital and stuff.
You seem to want to defend divisive chants by a small proportion of protestors, of whom there were only maybe a couple of thousand in total drawn from a population of hundreds of thousands. How do all the rest get engaged- by chanting that the area belongs to a few members of noisy subcultures. I don't think so.
Read the thread...But why on a day when (some) of the world is watching a supposedly peaceful protest that has a point. Peoples efforts have been undermined by 1 idiot
"Whose Brixton, Our Brixton"?
It's just a rehash of "Whose streets, our streets" from the original reclaim the streets.
Whose Brixton?
Yours, mine, everybody's, regardless of income or background. It can be big enough for all of us. As long as nobody gets too greedy, that is.
i don't know where you get the notion that hundreds of thousands of people live in brixton from. but a word to the wise: it is bollocks that even a hundred thousand people live in brixton. it's maybe 60,000 on the basis of 'brixton' being the wards of ferndale, brixton hill, tulse hill and coldharbour. the map of lambeth at http://www.lambeth.gov.uk/sites/default/files/Lambeth Wards.jpg shows brixton being in coldharbour ward (15,842 in 2011) but there you goCapital, property developers and so on weren't listening. Capital can't listen, thinking of property developers as individuals, as people who listen, is pointless.
Those chants were aimed at, and heard by, people in Brixton, and it was quite plain that a claim was being staked "OUR Brixton"
If the target of the chanting had been Lambeth council, or Network Rail, or Foxtons then fine, no problem at all. Even general attacks on capital and stuff.
You seem to want to defend divisive chants by a small proportion of protestors, of whom there were only maybe a couple of thousand in total drawn from a population of hundreds of thousands. How do all the rest get engaged- by chanting that the area belongs to a few members of noisy subcultures. I don't think so.
oh - and newbie it's disheartening that when you make a claim that can be checked you're found wanting. it makes me wonder about the other claims you make which can't be so readily verified.i don't know where you get the notion that hundreds of thousands of people live in brixton from. but a word to the wise: it is bollocks that even a hundred thousand people live in brixton. it's maybe 60,000 on the basis of 'brixton' being the wards of ferndale, brixton hill, tulse hill and coldharbour. the map of lambeth at http://www.lambeth.gov.uk/sites/default/files/Lambeth Wards.jpg shows brixton being in coldharbour ward (15,842 in 2011) but there you go
All kinds of people having a good time together, neither paying for it, nor doing serious harm... down with this sort of thing!Some dangerous stuff going on here <snip>
well we'll see, won't we, whether this has real traction or is simply a social whirl for those who use Brixton as a plaything. That's happened before, this place being the icon it is.I wasn't there, but I reckon you're over thinking it a bit.
Read the thread...
hardworking families intent on damaging their knees.Would love to but been supporting the London marathon mostly today. Real people, fighting real issues
Fucking idiots the lots of them.Would love to but been supporting the London marathon mostly today. Real people, fighting real issues
Sure they were. Okay, maybe a few who were raising money for charity, you can have those. But as for the rest...Would love to but been supporting the London marathon mostly today. Real people, fighting real issues
God I don't remember ever having heard the chant - I must have been right pissed at the Reclaim the streets I went to.
Well, others seem to possess that very power whenever they're judging whether customers of some unpopular businesses in the Village might be locals or tourists.How do you instinctively know that someone is from outside the are?
I remember this chant in Brixton 30 years ago after Cherry Groce was shot and the area went up.It's a popular chant. Even the fash are known to have used it against muslims.
Maybe it pre-exists reclaim the streets. Maybe reclaim the streets were coined after it.
surely the ideal is to get everyone, rich, young, poor, old, etc, etc wanting change in brixton. wanting to screw the greedy landlords, the heartless local politicians. no matter how long someone has been in brixton, if you live there you have a right to say "we don;t want our town turned into a rich ghetto". keep fighting!"Whose Brixton, Our Brixton"?
It's just a rehash of "Whose streets, our streets" from the original reclaim the streets.
It's a popular chant. Even the fash are known to have used it against muslims.
Maybe it pre-exists reclaim the streets. Maybe reclaim the streets were coined after it.
surely the ideal is to get everyone, rich, young, poor, old, etc, etc wanting change in brixton. wanting to screw the greedy landlords, the heartless local politicians. no matter how long someone has been in brixton, if you live there you have a right to say "we don;t want our town turned into a rich ghetto". keep fighting!