there's still time for epstein to be publicly crucifiedBill Cosby - convicted rapist
Michael Jackson - trial by media convicted child abuser
R Kelly - on trial for statutory rape
Jeffrey Epstein - convicted child abuser, out on a plea deal after an exceptionally short sentance no public crucifixion, no 4 hour prime time documentaries or rolling news stories, even though his case is far more disturbing in all sorts of ways than any of the above
Bill Cosby - convicted rapist
Michael Jackson - trial by media convicted child abuser
R Kelly - on trial for statutory rape
Jeffrey Epstein - convicted child abuser, out on a plea deal after an exceptionally short sentance no public crucifixion, no 4 hour prime time documentaries or rolling news stories, even though his case is far more disturbing in all sorts of ways than any of the above
there's still time for epstein to be publicly crucified
perhaps to a nine inch nails song, which would seem appropriateI hope so.
The first three are celebrities, known to much of the general population. There is a four hour documentary out on Jackson because he was one of the most famous people on the planet. Most people would have no idea who Jeffrey Epstein is. HBO wouldn't put up the money the Jackson documentary cost, because not nearly as many people would watch it.Bill Cosby - convicted rapist
Michael Jackson - trial by media convicted child abuser
R Kelly - on trial for statutory rape
Jeffrey Epstein - convicted child abuser, out on a plea deal after an exceptionally short sentance no public crucifixion, no 4 hour prime time documentaries or rolling news stories, even though his case is far more disturbing in all sorts of ways than any of the above
The first three are celebrities, known to much of the general population. There is a four hour documentary out on Jackson because he was one of the most famous people on the planet. Most people would have no idea who Jeffrey Epstein is.
I'm not sure we could safely say that any of the cases mentioned were swiftly and satisfactorily brought to conclusion tbf.
The general population care about that an awful lot. What they do care about if someone famous committed crimes. There wouldn’t be a documentary about Jackson had he merely known a paedophile. These famous people's morals may have been questionable (stop the press!), but they didn't commit what is considered among the worst crimes imaginable.But the people who flew on his plane, his friends who stayed at his house and went to his parties, these are some of the biggest names in the world, bigger than Bill Cosby, R Kelly and Michael Jackson.
Kelly and Jackson are two of the biggest pop stars in the world, and we've known they're nonces for decades, both of them - but up until recently, discussion of Kelly has been very hesitant indeed. Jackson has been dead and beyond suing for 10 years, and this is the first significant attempt to reckon with his history of abuse.But endlessly picked apart in the media.
I don't know it's not like the press havent talked about Jeffrey Epstein, but any discussion is a lot more hesitant, whereas the other cases seem almost gleeful in the way they are reported
Epstein may yet get his the Florida deal is falling apart. spooks will have loved a billionaire nonce they could get their hooks into him and all his noncey friends but given enough publicity they will leave him hanging he was a juicy source but only a source not even an agent and their life is usually short.
Epstein may yet get his the Florida deal is falling apart. spooks will have loved a billionaire nonce they could get their hooks into him and all his noncey friends but given enough publicity they will leave him hanging he was a juicy source but only a source not even an agent and their life is usually short.
A useless source at this point, if source he ever was. I doubt he's getting so many celebrity guests these days, even Trump has figured out he's toxic.
He's very used to his emotional incontinence and manipulation working, isn't he.
Did seem to have some obvious tells, although I'm always a little cynical about that kind of thing.
Too right. There's one bit where he's saying "yes, that's right" sorta thing while shaking his head. That one stood out.One big thumping tell in particular, which I'm sure many watching (or those who take an interest in body language, anyway) were agog at (I certainly was).
It's not an "ah, you did that, gotcha!" thing, though. He is undone by the way, as he loses his composure, his body language grows to increasingly contradict what his mouth is saying.
He catches himself doing it too, which I think is what sets off the tantrum.
It will make for an excellent piece of academic material.
I have to give it to Gayle King. She was calm as a Hindu cow.
The impression I got was that he lost his temper and emotion got the better of him but he realised it and tried to cover it up as an earnest outburst of emotion. He seems to be very self consciously pointing his body away from the interviewer so that he doesn't appear threatening on camera. The whole thing was an act.Wasn't she just. But how staged was Kelly's meltdown? Not convincing, at all. From the clips I saw, at any rate.
The interviewer says (in another video where she interviews the women in question) that he snuck in the room and was standing behind a screen the whole time she interviewed the women, coughing at times so they know he was there. He's guilty as sin. If he were not then he wouldn't feel the need to observe/control the women like that.
Too right. There's one bit where he's saying "yes, that's right" sorta thing while shaking his head. That one stood out.
Nope, apparently they were there togetherHang on, wasn't he interviewed in his own Chicago Trump Tower apartment? Surely the women would have been interviewed elsewhere?