editor
hiraethified
As the near total absence of people in my panorama suggests: around 2003.bloody when was that then?
As the near total absence of people in my panorama suggests: around 2003.bloody when was that then?
your photo doesn't work for me.As the near total absence of people in my panorama suggests: around 2003.
You'll have to take my word for it or look at it with a more capable machine.your photo doesn't work for me.
i've got a capable machine, your picture's not working for me. though i can see the nice writing 'granville shopping arcade, brixton london'You'll have to take my word for it or look at it with a more capable machine.
Nor for me.your photo doesn't work for me.
One in six households now have private landlords. And it is no longer largely the preserve of students and young people. Indeed, the number of families with children forced to privately rent has nearly doubled in just five years to more than a million. They face the prospect of having to repeatedly move, disrupting the education and overall wellbeing of their kids.
Greedy landlords are fully aware that most cannot afford to pay their extortionate rents. But they also know that the taxpayer will step in and subsidise them with housing benefits. According to the Homes for London campaign, to get a two-bed place in Camden, you need an average monthly household income of £5,324; in Tower Hamlets – one of the poorest boroughs in Britain – it's £4,333, way over double Britain's median household income. It's the state that tops up the difference. Back in 2002, 100,000 private renters in London were claiming housing benefit; it soared to 250,000 by the time New Labour was booted out.
But Cameron's Government has decided to punish the tenant, imposing a housing benefit cap that will force many out of their homes. London is on course to be more like Paris: with a centre that is a playground for the affluent, while the poorest are confined to the edges.
You need java installed.Nor for me.
Well it definitely does work on most machines because those pages get loads of traffic, so it could be down to any kind of issue on your machine.I have....and automatic updates.
And now I work on the front line of gentrification in Brixton Village, where I'm trying to make a business and create work locally.
lol, I'm glad someone picked up on how pretentious that soundedfuck off. please. I hope that's not too rude. Take your cupcakes and, erm... oh... fuck off.
The 'frontline'? do u have any idea how loaded that phrase is in brixton? you sell cupcakes and/or funny hats. fuck off.
whatever. I was, however, fully aware of the significance of the word "frontline", and used it deliberately. Perhaps I should have used <irony> tags.lol, I'm glad someone picked up on how pretentious that sounded
"The frontline of gentrification"
as long as you're not out there exterminating tramps.whatever. I was, however, fully aware of the significance of the word "frontline", and used it deliberately. Perhaps I should have used <irony> tags.
Well, they've done up the Ladies, I haven't been in the Gents.The Canterbury remains very much un-gentrified
The gents remains un gentrifiedWell, they've done up the Ladies, I haven't been in the Gents.
Well, they've done up the Ladies, I haven't been in the Gents.
whatever. I was, however, fully aware of the significance of the word "frontline", and used it deliberately. Perhaps I should have used <irony> tags.
as long as you're not out there exterminating tramps.
It worked for me.Which would have been fine if the supposed irony had worked for anyone except you.
The landlords worked with spacemakers after it was listed - it was because it got listed by Paul Bakelite, FBM etc that the landlords redevelopment plans ended, and they were then up for working with spacemakers via the council. Spacemakers didn't know Brixton existed when it was being listed.when the Spacemakers project started trying to revive it and it got listed.
It was lovely (I had a sneaky peek) and then blocked on the re-opening day....I don't know about the Canterbury but the gents in the Albert seems quite ungentrified. The door may have moved moved but the piss lake remains well in place.
I did too - though fortyplus, get your story round the right way -
The landlords worked with spacemakers after it was listed - it was because it got listed by Paul Bakelite, FBM etc that the landlords redevelopment plans ended, and they were then up for working with spacemakers via the council. Spacemakers didn't know Brixton existed when it was being listed.
No indeed - flesh and bloodBakalite. He's not made of a phenolic thermoplastic.
No indeed - flesh and blood