Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill

Evidently it doesn't include delivering the pension that some people signed up to.

Perhaps they've taken to deducting compensation payments for victims of police malfeasance from the police pension fund instead of making taxpayers cover it.
 
.
This intrigues me, is any more detail available?



But basically existing old bill get 15% of their salary docked which is used to pay the pensions of retired Rozzers (along with a levy on PCCs' budgets).
 
Last edited:
Increasing the maximum penalty for criminal damage of a memorial from 3 months to 10 years

Thats one hell of a jump, from 3 months to 1 year mught seem reasonable but a 40-fold increase implies that a raw nerve has been touched somewhere.

A dog-whistle to the hangers and floggers who don't like folk decorating that Churchkill statue in Westminster. It would be a very stupid judge who would impose a sentence of that length.
 
There isn’t a Police pension fund. It’s a giant Ponzi scheme basically.

TBF it isn't a Ponzi scheme either - they've always had to (and understood they would have to) underwrite it.

The post-2007 reforms seem to just want to make it more likely the Government return to the days when many people retired and then died before they got to the point where they'd received more money than they put in - something which increased life expectancy generally (and them recruiting loads of cadets in the 70s and 80s without realising they'd be able to retire at 48 specifically) have made less common than it was.
 
TBF it isn't a Ponzi scheme either - they've always had to (and understood they would have to) underwrite it.

The post-2007 reforms seem to just want to make it more likely the Government return to the days when many people retired and then died before they got to the point where they'd received more money than they put in - something which increased life expectancy generally (and them recruiting loads of cadets in the 70s and 80s without realising they'd be able to retire at 48 specifically) have made less common than it was.
I was exaggerating for comic effect... But yes can't have anyone other than MPs get more out of a public sector pension scheme than they put in...
 
That describes the State Pension wonderfully well. :)

Those of you still working, work harder! The State Pension must not be put in jeopardy! :)

Its OK. It's been a very decent 12 months for the country's pension fund....


:(
 
Its OK. It's been a very decent 12 months for the country's pension fund....


:(

I actually wrote to the Chancellor, suggesting that those in receipt of State Pension should be able to forgo the 2.5% rise this year. We don't need it, and there many in the same situation. It didn't seem right in view of the fiscal carnage of the last year, that we should benefit where others do not.

Answer there was none. Too difficult to implement perhaps.
 
Wherever you look in the legislation, it works to lower the point at which the police can intervene. The old legislation, for instance, said they could do so to prevent “disorder, damage, disruption or intimidation”. That old formulation remains, but the Home Office has added a new criteria: “impact”.

Look closely at those words. The ones in the old legislation were all negative. But the new one is entirely neutral. Legally, it seems very broad. But if you look closer it is actually quite specific. It aims its sights at the entire purpose of protest.

The point of a demonstration is to be heard, to make an argument, to encourage others – whether they are people passing by, or workers in a company, or MPs in parliament – to hear the protestors’ point of view. In other words, to have an “impact”. This is why we call them ‘demonstrations’. It is a demonstration of a political view, expressed so that it can convince others. That is what makes it a vital part of free speech.

Source: Silencing Black Lives Matter: Priti Patel's anti-protest law - Politics.co.uk
 
Another aspect to the proposals regarding memorials is that in recent years some village and other small war memorials have had their bronze plaques and other bronze fittings stolen. You can guess where the finger of suspicion will point - gravy on top of the red meat.
 
Last edited:
If this goes through it's another nail in the coffin, they allowed the police and security services to use rape and torture with immunity. Labour abstained. What are they building?
 
Back
Top Bottom