Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Police and UKBA to ransack Brixton (Thursday 6th March)

Journo Jarrett Bryan said:
"I could have gone around brixton, yes, but more important than who spoke in brix is that what was said was credible"

Where to start with this eh?

"I could have gone around brixton, yes..."

Yes. You could. It was your job to. To go around and find some people and interview them for a programme to get a point of view that reflected the diverse makeup of Brixton, it's isolated and interlocking communities and the vast, if decreasing, scale of class, race and genders which make up the area. Yes. You could have gone around Brixton. And should have.

"...but more important than who spoke in brix is that what was said was credible"

By credible, you mean? That they're all from Brixton, although they obviously all occupy the same office and therefore it's reasonable to assume they all occupy very similar income bands. Or by credible, that they are suitably qualified for appearing on television and offering opinions. Or by credible, you mean it's unlikely any of them might say something untoward which detracts from your piece. You know, offer a dissenting view or question your role in the whole thing.

"More important than who spoke in brix is that what was said was credible"

So it's alright to stage a vox pop with your mates you used to work with because they're camera friendly and easy, as long as they offer opinions what will be like what you expected to get from an actual vox pop? That's shallow, callow, bottom of the saucer 'journalism' of the Hari school of bullshit.

It's vox populi, vox dei - not vox p.r, vox dei.

You idiot.
 
Where to start with this eh?



Yes. You could. It was your job to. To go around and find some people and interview them for a programme to get a point of view that reflected the diverse makeup of Brixton, it's isolated and interlocking communities and the vast, if decreasing, scale of class, race and genders which make up the area. Yes. You could have gone around Brixton. And should have.



By credible, you mean? That they're all from Brixton, although they obviously all occupy the same office and therefore it's reasonable to assume they all occupy very similar income bands. Or by credible, that they are suitably qualified for appearing on television and offering opinions. Or by credible, you mean it's unlikely any of them might say something untoward which detracts from your piece. You know, offer a dissenting view or question your role in the whole thing.



So it's alright to stage a vox pop with your mates you used to work with because they're camera friendly and easy, as long as they offer opinions what will be like what you expected to get from an actual vox pop? That's shallow, callow, bottom of the saucer 'journalism' of the Hari school of bullshit.

It's vox populi, vox dei - not vox p.r, vox dei.

You idiot.

Largely agreed.

But, again, vox pops are difficult undertakings, especially against the clock.

Even if you are lucky enough to
find articulate interviewees they often walk away at the sight of a camera lens.

The only assignment I found more troubling was obtaining pictures from the families of tragedy victims.
 
Largely agreed.

But, again, vox pops are difficult undertakings, especially against the clock.

Even if you are lucky enough to
find articulate interviewees they often walk away at the sight of a camera lens.

The only assignment I found more troubling was obtaining pictures from the families of tragedy victims.
To be fair, I don't think it would have been too hard to find people willing to talk to the camera on this particular day, given the headline in the paper about the police corruption in the Stephen Lawrence investigation and the ridiculous Brixton Unite event which was seemingly tasked with getting as many police as possible into the town centre to wind up people as much as they can.

Even I would have been happy to give a vox pop interview that day.
 
Channel 4 yesterday admitted misleading viewers with a report on policing in which the interviewees worked for the same company.
In the wake of last week’s allegations of corruption and cover-up in the Stephen Lawrence murder inquiry, the broadcaster commissioned a ‘vox pop’ to gauge views on the police in London.
However, instead of finding a representative sample of opinion, the reporter contacted staff from the office he had worked in before joining Channel 4.

A resident established that the interviewees were all linked and posted his findings on a popular local website, Brixton Buzz, which broke the story.

From everyone's favourite paper:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2577967/C4-admits-misleading-viewers-poll-trust-police.html
 
"popular local website, Brixton Buzz" eh? I like that :)

Good to see posts from folks here appearing in the paper too. Get in!

And, in the print version, a name-check for Urban75 as well!

jetadema.jpg
 
The Metropolitan Police complained to Ofcom about the C4/Livity farrago, and here is the result:

"Channel 4 News report misled viewers, Ofcom rules"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-31495554


"Ofcom there was "a significant failure" because the broadcast made it appear that three of the interviewees were randomly selected members of the public.
The regulator said broadcasters had a "fundamental obligation... to ensure that audiences are not misled by the manner in which news is presented".
It added that "breaches of this nature are amongst the most serious that can be committed by a broadcaster because they go to the heart of the relationship of trust between a broadcaster and its audience".


Ofcom determination here, pages 6-17:

http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/enforcement/broadcast-bulletins/obb273/Issue273.pdf
 
i'd have more confidence in this if the police were occasionally ruled to have misled the publick round eg the death of ian tomlinson or mark duggan or jean charles de menezes
 
i'd have more confidence in this if the police were occasionally ruled to have misled the publick round eg the death of ian tomlinson or mark duggan or jean charles de menezes
What happened to the police officer present when Sean Rigg died in custody who wanted to resign his post and get ordained a priest? Did he get ordained?
 
Back
Top Bottom