Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Police and UKBA to ransack Brixton (Thursday 6th March)

I remember hearing a report on the radio in the summer about the problems of aggressive behaviour by seagulls on beaches. One of the respondents to the vox-pop was willing to talk about the problems she had faced, but preferred not to give her name. Still perhaps one shouldn't sneer at the risks posed by gangs seagulls seeking revenge

It was a seagull crapping on my head during a particularly moronic vox pop that destroyed my passion for reporting.
 
being sacked means not being able to pay the rent, put food on the table etc.

the guy made a mistake, got caught out etc. but it shouldn't be a career ending offence for a young inexperienced journalist IMO.
Fair enough. At the same time, I don't think inexperience is an altogether convincing excuse for being intentionally deceptive - it does show a certain lack of integrity, particularly when coupled with his smart arse response after being caught out. He really should not need to have someone explain to him what he did wrong. I guess that if he's any good, he'll get a bollocking and, if he is not all that well thought of by his employers, they will take this opportunity to say bye bye.

Anyway, I bet he's not feeling so terribly clever just now.

I think the Livity individuals (unless they were somehow unaware of eachother's interviews :hmm:) should also be given a stern talking to. This has done Livity's credibility no favours whatsoever.
 
being sacked means not being able to pay the rent, put food on the table etc.

the guy made a mistake, got caught out etc. but it shouldn't be a career ending offence for a young inexperienced journalist IMO.
so what's arguably gross misconduct should iyo not receive the usual punishment
 
how do you know it's his first strike?
I don't, but you apparently want him sacked regardless of whether it's first strike or final straw.

I prefer to give particularly young staff the opportunity to learn from their mistakes, rather than binning them the first time they make a mistake.
 
What I don't really understand is why a journalist would, particularly , put their career at risk by doing something quite so stupid. Surely, he can't have believed that it wouldn't get flagged up.

That's precisely what he will have believed, because even as a relatively rookie reporter, he'll have seen similar "busking" done by older colleagues (usually those who are on a deadline to produce something for the next news broadcast, etc). same thing happens in print journalism, although it's less obvious there, much of the time, and much easier to disguise.

I've always got the impression that Snow and Co. see themselves as news broadcasting's honourable elite rather disdainful of the squalid machinations of the rest of the news media. Will John and Krishnan be happy about having their image so tarnished.

Perhaps, the Independent is still looking for an imaginative young journalist to fill the void left by the sad demise of johan Hari.

Broadcast journalism is as murky as print, with the added quirk of hiring reporters as much on their appearance, as on their journalistic ability. :)
 
Maybe this kind of thing is OK with sports and music reporting? Channel 4 News have him as a "sports reporter".

Just seems so naive and amateurish. Why not just go out for a few minutes and talk to some people? What was the benefit in doing what he did? :confused:

Usually? Time-saving. Quicker to poll your pals, than question a couple of dozen locals to get maybe half a dozen usable (generally post-edit) replies.
 
Surprisingly hard.

Most people refuse to go on the record.

Those that do are usually mad.

Or have a bee in their bonnet/an agenda. Surprisingly often about rubbish collection and/or local council corruption.

(I'm not defending this guy, just sharing my experience of doing innumerable vox pops in city centres)

Such fun. :D
 
being sacked means not being able to pay the rent, put food on the table etc.

the guy made a mistake, got caught out etc. but it shouldn't be a career ending offence for a young inexperienced journalist IMO.

Agreed.
And if he learns from the experience, all the better.
Given the "brush off" attitude he showed on twitter, though, he may be impervious to absorbing the lesson. :(
 
I remember hearing a report on the radio in the summer about the problems of aggressive behaviour by seagulls on beaches. One of the respondents to the vox-pop was willing to talk about the problems she had faced, but preferred not to give her name. Still perhaps one shouldn't sneer at the risks posed by gangs seagulls seeking revenge

Those gulls are utter cunts. You diss a gull, and the next thing you know, all it's mates are pecking lumps out of you, and shitting on your car, the little bastards!
 
I am faintly disappointed that nobody has managed to get a story into the mainstream about the crack squirrels being gentrified...

:p
 
  • Like
Reactions: CH1
one involved doesn't seem too bothered "lol"





look it's nice outside, nothing to see here!


Looks like Jordan Jarrett-Bryan has deleted his twitter account, unless I'm being a techno dunce again (quite possible....:oops:)

The Guardian story's on the front page of the site...
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom