cybertect
It's grim up north (London)
and zero credit given to the source of the story.
one lot of shoddy journalism at C4 followed by another at the indy
I already asked them about that on Twitter
and zero credit given to the source of the story.
one lot of shoddy journalism at C4 followed by another at the indy
I remember hearing a report on the radio in the summer about the problems of aggressive behaviour by seagulls on beaches. One of the respondents to the vox-pop was willing to talk about the problems she had faced, but preferred not to give her name. Still perhaps one shouldn't sneer at the risks posed by gangs seagulls seeking revenge
Fair enough. At the same time, I don't think inexperience is an altogether convincing excuse for being intentionally deceptive - it does show a certain lack of integrity, particularly when coupled with his smart arse response after being caught out. He really should not need to have someone explain to him what he did wrong. I guess that if he's any good, he'll get a bollocking and, if he is not all that well thought of by his employers, they will take this opportunity to say bye bye.being sacked means not being able to pay the rent, put food on the table etc.
the guy made a mistake, got caught out etc. but it shouldn't be a career ending offence for a young inexperienced journalist IMO.
so what's arguably gross misconduct should iyo not receive the usual punishmentbeing sacked means not being able to pay the rent, put food on the table etc.
the guy made a mistake, got caught out etc. but it shouldn't be a career ending offence for a young inexperienced journalist IMO.
1 strike and you're out eh. Lovely approach.so what's arguably gross misconduct should iyo not receive the usual punishment
how do you know it's his first strike?1 strike and you're out eh. Lovely approach.
I don't, but you apparently want him sacked regardless of whether it's first strike or final straw.how do you know it's his first strike?
how do you know it's his first strike?
yes yes you've said that. but a journalist who fakes a story goes beyond 'a mistake'I don't, but you apparently want him sacked regardless of whether it's first strike or final straw.
I prefer to give particularly young staff the opportunity to learn from their mistakes, rather than binning them the first time they make a mistake.
At least they had the courtesy to give the site a credit (albeit with no link so people can't follow the story back to here).Crikey, now the ES has run the story:
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/londoners-diary/view-from-brixton-is-er-all-the-same-9181662.html
Crikey, now the ES has run the story:
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/londoners-diary/view-from-brixton-is-er-all-the-same-9181662.html
Is the problem shoddy journalism?
Or that the people interviewed didn't say the right things? (I never saw it)
Or both?
I've never seen much value in vox pops, however egregious an example this one is.
What I don't really understand is why a journalist would, particularly , put their career at risk by doing something quite so stupid. Surely, he can't have believed that it wouldn't get flagged up.
I've always got the impression that Snow and Co. see themselves as news broadcasting's honourable elite rather disdainful of the squalid machinations of the rest of the news media. Will John and Krishnan be happy about having their image so tarnished.
Perhaps, the Independent is still looking for an imaginative young journalist to fill the void left by the sad demise of johan Hari.
Maybe this kind of thing is OK with sports and music reporting? Channel 4 News have him as a "sports reporter".
Just seems so naive and amateurish. Why not just go out for a few minutes and talk to some people? What was the benefit in doing what he did?
Surprisingly hard.
Most people refuse to go on the record.
Those that do are usually mad.
(I'm not defending this guy, just sharing my experience of doing innumerable vox pops in city centres)
being sacked means not being able to pay the rent, put food on the table etc.
the guy made a mistake, got caught out etc. but it shouldn't be a career ending offence for a young inexperienced journalist IMO.
I remember hearing a report on the radio in the summer about the problems of aggressive behaviour by seagulls on beaches. One of the respondents to the vox-pop was willing to talk about the problems she had faced, but preferred not to give her name. Still perhaps one shouldn't sneer at the risks posed by gangs seagulls seeking revenge
Makes the diary page in today's Standard, with a plug for Brixton Buzz
one involved doesn't seem too bothered "lol"
look it's nice outside, nothing to see here!