GarfieldLeChat
fucking awesome but wrong
as I've said to both of you; you are blowing up something which need not be blown up.And you then, presumably.
I wanted to put forward my perspective on all of this, given that I am one of the 2 people involved. Would you deny me that, Garf?
And is that an implied threat? I believe you already did 'take sides' - certainly reads that way to me.
he should have been more grateful for the effort put in you shouldn't have started name calling at someone with a history of manic episodes who was likely to react.
everything else afterwards is just additional sorties.
now you're trying to pick a fight with me when all I've done is bang your heads together and say behave...
but fine act aggrieved that someone is telling you both to calm down and be reasonable.
says more about you than you nonsensical claims of being denied a voice (no ones censoring you are they).
take my being able to wipe both of you of the planet in terms of poetry or lyrical dexterity and having had acres more success at it as a threat if you want but then as you're intent appears to turn anything into a slight and build a granite mole hill it's hardly surprising...
6 of 1 half a dozen of the other...
if you hadn't fired the first shot then it wouldn't have been returned you can't then complain the other side had artillery... you offence is at the reaction to the offence caused by you... which is ludicrous in the extreme...
you're both clearly nutters...