danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
I'm afraid that doesn't make sense. Whose resposibilities are you talking about?I think their responsibilities lie in the right place, we do not need new runways ( paid by the government ).
I'm afraid that doesn't make sense. Whose resposibilities are you talking about?I think their responsibilities lie in the right place, we do not need new runways ( paid by the government ).
Making public transport cheaper and more convenient would be of benefit to society.Changing the financial structure to manipulate us all onto the trains might be a positive environmental move but makes little or no financial sense.
Making public transport cheaper and more convenient would be of benefit to society.
I don't see many people having a go at the weather in such disgust when their flight is delayed for 2 days.
But self-righteous puritans disrupting the rare holiday of a low-paid worker doesn't tackle that at all. It just shows them up as lifestylers without a clear analysis of the situation.
consider the fuel subsidy, and given that many flights are actually cheaper than trains. What makes flying so different that it isn't classified as 'public' transport?
These ones aren't, though. They're missing the point, and targeting the wrong people.Intriguing isn't it? How every age demonises its protesters (witness some of our own posts). It takes a few generations to transform protesters into heroes/heroines.
what makes it different is that it's never been provided by the state, unlike trains and buses.
what valso makes it different is the environmental consequences
Trans EU train journeys, at least via the HSTs, should get easier, if not cheaper, from next year
http://www.railteam.co.uk/
And the middle classes take several such flights a year not just a couple.
If the protesters could single out frequent flyers and business class, then fair play. But they can't. Some of the people disrupted will be folk who have saved up for ages, and who don't get many holidays. I'd be furious if it had been me on one of the less-than-a-handful of occasions I'd flown.
Yes, I'm more angry at the government, but frankly so should the protesters be.
I said they were indiscriminate. In my first post I said if they can target only frequent flyers and business class then fair enough.This idea that the likes of Plane Stupid are attacking "workers going on holiday" is simplistic at best.
It's about frequent flying, isn't it. I've flown fewer times in my lifetime than Coldplay's Chris Martin has probably flown this week.What does someones working status have to do with whether it's acceptable to disrupt them or not?
At whom is that gag directed?Then protest the pilots, they fly every day...
OK I sort of get you, I pity the people that have had their flights disrupted but that is not an uncommon thing at Airports is it, usually delays are the fault of the Airport itself, weather etc, so it is not uncommon to have to wait in Airports for hours on end, just because this time it is due to a valid protest does not make it any worse than fog for example, you are still holed up in a shithole Airport.
I don't see many people having a go at the weather in such disgust when their flight is delayed for 2 days.