editor said:
I was ready to be wowed by the super slick interface and the power of Adobe, but after seeing the program gobble up 400meg of RAM while doing precisely nothing, my enthusiasm faded.
The fact that you can't even drag images straight into Photoshop didn't exactly impress, so I found myself going straight back to ACDSee.
Speaking personally, I find a dedicated keyboard command a lot quicker than drag 'n' drop.
Since I moved over to Lightroom, I've found that I can process a bunch of photos in about half the time it used to take me using Canon DPP or ACR with Photoshop. 90+% of the time I don't need to do any further PP in Photoshop, so I'm making a big saving on the disk space I'd be using to store a TIFF for that purpose (I do shoot RAW almost exclusively; it would probably be far less important if I was working with JPEG files out of the camera).
As much as anything, though, it's the way it handles metadata and organising my photos that is attractive. Bridge, even in CS3 isn't as flexible for IPTC tagging. It's the
organisational features that that make Lightroom different from a plain old RAW converter. It's not going to improve my photography by any significant degree, but it makes my life easier, and for that it's worth the price of admission. I don't think that makes me a fool.
Judging by other users' reports, it does seem to be a little more perky on the Mac than Windows. I'd probably agree about needing 2GB of RAM to make effective use of it in combination with Photoshop, but you probably don't want to be running PS on its own with much less than that these days if you're using it seriously. It works fine on my Dual 2.3 GHz G5 desktop (2.5 GB RAM) and it flies on my new 2.2 GHz Core 2 Duo MacBook Pro (2GB RAM)
Either way, it's a lot faster than Aperture, which was my major alternative for a library tool.
It ain't perfect. firky's comment about 2K°C white point minimum strikes a note with me. It's fairly clearly not aimed at large agencies who need to shift stuff around between different users a lot.