Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

P&O Ferries sacks workers and docks ships

and I'm not the only one getting fed up with threads here turning into twitter feeds.

Have you been on the Planet Remain thread and raised this concern that you and ‘others’ have about posters just sticking up Twitter posts instead of actually writing something?
 
Sounds like the Cairnryan demo/blockade was a bit eventful:

Also a report from Larne:
 
Interesting [?] move ... if a bit late.


It looks like a tiny contract, a couple of hundred foot passengers a year to Calais.

Refusing DP World the chance to snap up more UK infrastructure/companies would be more effective, but of course the vermin want a symbol rather than actual action.
 
Last edited:
P&O Ferries will not face criminal proceedings for mass sacking of staff
Sat 20 Aug 2022
Tory MP Huw Merriman, who chairs the Commons transport committee, called for legislation to ensure that a company like P&O could not do the same thing again.

“The disgrace is on P&O but the disgrace will be on parliament if we don’t fix it and stop it from happening again,” Merriman said.

He told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “The law isn’t strong enough and as MPs we need to legislate to make sure that it is.

Nautilus International, a union which represents maritime professionals, said the Insolvency Service’s decision would be a blow to the “discarded” workers.
 
Same amount of sympathy as for the Tory MPs complaining about sewage dumping when they voted against it. They could have done something, and they didn't.
 
RMT/Nautilus demo in London on Wednesday marking the two-year anniversary:
1710528759923.png
 
Not sure if the dispute between Nautlius & the Isle Of Man Steam Packet was much better than a draw.
But watching from the sidelines was interesting, eventually Manxman entered service.
Although the boat seems to have a few "engineering" issues to resolve alongside the staffing problems
 
a new law is being signed in France today which prohibits the usage of workers being paid less than the minimum wage and not following the working hours directives on trans channel ferries, so P&O is going to have to change its practices from the last few years hopefully.
the government here says their equivalent law will come into force this summer according to the guardian .

none of which makes up for the fucked up way they treated their workers 2 years ago.
 
Unfortunately for P&O there is a separate government on each side of the Channel the French Law not only sets minimum wages it also sets a maximum of 2 weeks on/2 weeks off for crew living aboard. This isn't an issue for European based crews, they just walk off the ship and catch a bus home at the end of their 2 weeks on. For crews from third world countries they can't spend their 2 weeks downtime in either the EU or UK so would have to be flown home (and back again) at every shift change which would make employing them no cheaper (and quite possibly more expensive) than the crews they replaced.

 
What are people getting concerned about? It's a competitive marketplace - the workers are paid competitive wages and the CEO is paid a competitive salary 🤷‍♂️

:mad:
 
Here’s an interesting test for Starmer.

Bigoted Saudi capital objecting to being described in factual terms and threatening to withhold investment into the UK ahead of Starmer’s attempt to woo capital next week at his investment conference.

It goes without saying, I hope, that Haigh is absolutely correct in her characterisation of the company. It also goes without saying that she should be backed by her boss in calling out the disgusting employment practises it operates and the treatment of its own workers.

It also raises again the pathetic limits of Labour’s industrial strategy: hoping for growth by attracting some of the worst employers in the world to invest in Britain….

How a critical interview put P&O owner’s £1bn ports deal under threat

 
Last edited:
FT says "the project is still likely to go ahead"...ultimately the Saudi sultans project of buying up the UK will not be stopped by an occasional squeal
and, buried within that piece, is the crux of problematic, post-privatisation relationship between the (consolidator) state and financialised capital:

One Dubai-based executive said Number 10 was wise to distance itself from Haigh’s comments, but insisted that DP World’s investment decisions were based on commercial realities rather than political barbs.
Investment in the UK's port provision and operation are based on nothing more than budgetary headings of asset management companies; there being no way for the state to have any levers on strategic provision or growth. The political superstructure is largely irrelevant with (negative) planning decisions being pretty much the only control in place.
 
They're such shits, the Saudis aren't doing this to do the UK a favour they are doing it to extract profit from the UK, fuck 'em off.
Well, exactly.

Long after the UK needs to import their oil, they'll be accumulating wealth from our reliance on them to facilitate the import of EVs, batteries and parts. And the UK's privatised, deregulated ports sector where, unlike most other OECD economies, the state has sold off any interest in the land of the ports, makes operations here particularly vulnerable to regional monopoly exploitation.
 
Utter fucking scumbag:


Suspect Andy McDonald would be in bother (again) if he repeated that performance today. He already had the whip withdrawn for repeating the phrase 'from the river to the sea' and only got it back after a fairly abject apology.
 
Back
Top Bottom