dilute micro
esse quam videri
Relevance? Or is it the case that, once again, you're pursuing your own narrow agenda here?
Yes it's entirely relevant. How do you suppose it's a personal agenda?
The original government is well documented and so is its transformation into the centralized one we have now. Government of centralized power isn't a new invention. The founders believed that the best way to protect liberty was to disseminate power closer to the people where the people would have better eyes on it because it would be right in their face as opposed to a distant government that controlled your lives while you're unaware of what was happening. The federal government was only given limited powers. It wasn't even made up the way it is today. It was engineered towards local representation - the state congresses, where the real power was, chose the US senators. Vice-presidents were elected on their own - not a package deal with the president. The supreme court didn't have the power it has now. The presidency didn't have the power it has now. And so on...
Nowadays no one in government cares what limitations are supposed to be imposed on their office. The president takes powers that by law (or spirit of the law) only belong to the congress. The congress takes powers that belong to the states. There's no one governing the government. That's what it's all about. That's where the issues that have the people in the streets come from. If government has no rules then in opportunistic fashion an outside entity comes in and takes advantage - it takes control. Who do you think controls the government...'the people'? This shit has been going on in earnest for over 150 years. President Grant himself coined the term 'lobbyist'. Attempts to turn the government into a political patronage & profit machine had gone on well before that. That's the "personal agenda". You've got it backwards and you don't realize it.