Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

NUS national protest against the cuts 10.11.10 [London]

This is a revolution, is it? Thing is, much as I deplore violence, I can understand it in truly repressed countries where the people are subject to brutal regimes. As I said earlier, this ain't no Tianamen Square.

Yeah, it's shit what the ConDems and their New Labour predecessors and their predecessors etc have done to the people but it's not fertile ground for a revolution.

This post contains epic amounts of stupid.
 
The cunt from the NUS is on Sky, blaming it on Anarchists, called the actions at Millbank despicable and a disgrace.

Fuck off you piece of shit wannabe bureaucrat.

These are some pretty bold statements from someone who is sitting in the warm typing, rather than protesting...
 
Because leadership like this crave ineffectual protest as an outlet and diversion for real anger, safe in the knowledge that such protests will achieve nothing and allow them to scale the career ladder in politics that every national NUS bureaucrat dreams of building on the backs of their members.

This is real treachery and his reaction to the minor civil disobedience shown today tells us everything we need to know about him and the entire NUS leadership. He, like all union leaders are active obstacles to a real fight. Steam valves whose entire purpose is to control and dampen real struggles. As soon as the slightest attempt to launch anything but impotent symbolic protest is made his true colours come out and he condemns it. He's a traitor and every NUS member should treat him with the contempt he deserves and spit in his cowardly face.

He's trying to maintain the reputation of the protest from a minority of trouble makers though.

Most people don't think it's reasonable to go around smashing windows and setting fire to things because you don't like the decision of a democratically elected government. He fully knows when all the media will report is this trouble that he needs to distance himself and the NUS from it to maintain any credibility.
 
You're new to this business aren't you?

No. But I do notice similar sarcastic replies whenever one goes against the more pro-violence posters on urban.

I've been on plenty of protests; been kettled, knocked to the ground etc. But I don't get a hard on for a punch up like some of ye.
 
He's trying to maintain the reputation of the protest from a minority of trouble makers though.

Most people don't think it's reasonable to go around smashing windows and setting fire to things because you don't like the decision of a democratically elected government. He fully knows when all the media will report is this trouble that he needs to distance himself and the NUS from it to maintain any credibility.

lol
 
Anyway...

Violence???

Has this protest actually been violent?

Y'know. Proper fighting etc.

Or just a bit of vandalism and chucking bits of paper and balsa wood around?
 
there hasn't even been that much violence anyway, has there? 9 minor injuries? that's not what i call widespread violence...
 
Yeah, played right into their hands, didn't they? Once again the reasons for the protest will be ignored in favour of salacious coverage of the violence.

Well done, dickheads.
:facepalm:

yep, cos debate and trusting the elected representatives has really worked well to date eh?
 
Back
Top Bottom