DaveCinzano
WATCH OUT, GEORGE, HE'S GOT A SCREWDRIVER!
It's like superannuated wrestling, with Leveson as a Commissioner leaping into the ring to tag in from Jay onto über-heel Rupe. Somebody hand his a folding chair!
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...l-parliament-the-truth-yesterday-7681804.html
Top civil servant was asked 10 times if the culture secretary's statement to Commons was the truth, 10 times he refused to answer...
He didn't refuse at all. He explained his /the departments position repeatedly in various ways. It's hardly his fault if Margaret Fucking Hodge wants to jump on the bandwagon and gain herself (even more) attention:http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...l-parliament-the-truth-yesterday-7681804.html
Top civil servant was asked 10 times if the culture secretary's statement to Commons was the truth, 10 times he refused to answer...
Yeah, fuck off Hodge.I am very sorry. These are very important matters. They are rightly the subject of interest of Parliament. That’s why the Secretary of State made a full statement yesterday and answers questions. I have come ready to speak about the Olympics. I have made clear the position set out in various statements yesterday and I think I need to stand on that without any implications being drawn whatsoever. I was not given any notice of these questions.
It's not jumping on the bandwagon, he was asked to back up what the minister had said to Parliament and didn't. Are these things not important?. should he just have been asked about the Olympics?He didn't refuse at all. He explained his /the departments position repeatedly in various ways. It's hardly his fault if Margaret Fucking Hodge wants to jump on the bandwagon and gain herself (even more) attention:
Yeah, fuck off Hodge.
His job is the senior civil servant at the Department for Culture, Media and Sport so this very much does fall under his remit, why shouldn't he be questioned?Of course. That's his job, thats what he was asked to do, that's what he prepared for.
indeedIncisive and convincing as usual. The bone-idle comedy cynic strikes again.
Evidence that words came out of his mouth isn't evidence that he answered the question. Or, to put it another way... if he did answer the question whether he approved the SPAD talking to Murdoch, what was the answer?He didn't refuse at all. He explained his /the departments position repeatedly in various ways. It's hardly his fault if Margaret Fucking Hodge wants to jump on the bandwagon and gain herself (even more) attention:
.
He didn't refuse at all.
Yes, we get it - Margaret Hodge is a waste of space - but using that irrelevance to support your assertion that the civil sevant 'answered the question' rather than 'refused to answer the question' is weopons grade bollocks.Of course he didn't answer what the self-serving, opportunist Hodge wanted him to. His answer was 'fuck the fuck off', which in the circs is the correct answer.
You must be really bored if you want to play that sort of game.I didn't know there was a 'we'. Who else is in your 'we'?
She's not a waste of space
The graun gives a different slant on thishttp://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...l-parliament-the-truth-yesterday-7681804.html
Top civil servant was asked 10 times if the culture secretary's statement to Commons was the truth, 10 times he refused to answer...