It is amusing to see so many PR nobbers getting caught nuts deep in this shit:
cameron isn't a PR nobber though - he's a politician, always has been. his tenure at carlton is a distraction.
For the purposes of gloating at the misfortunes of coke-addled PR nobbers of course he is a coke-addled PR nobber.
Ken: six reasons Boris Johnson is not speaking for London
http://www.kenlivingstone.com/briefing-six-reasons
Analysts say the events of the past few days have caused major damage to the company, as 19% of its total value has evaporated.
"You're now looking at [about] $10bn wiped off the value since the peak," said Stephen Mayne, director of the Australian Shareholders' Association.
In order to prove the criminal offence of blackmail it must be shown that the defendant has done the following things:
That the defendant made a demand (f a demand is implied this may be enough to prove blackmail under the Theft Act)
With menaces (forms of menaces such as a threat to expose some form of secret will be deemed enough to constitute blackmail for the purposes of the Theft Act. )
That the demand was unwarranted
That the defendant has a view to make a gain for himself or another or have intent to cause a loss to another
As mentioned on the other thread if NI were happy to hack the phones/voicemails of the Dowler family then what about the McCanns?
It's not a joking matter, smokedout. Maddie's parents could be tortured right now with untold fears, such as 'whether any attempts to hold her hostage/ransom her were deleted by a hack', as could a whole host of other victims' families who are unwillingly subjected to this dark scandal.
Which they would doubtlessly tell to any reputable newspaper for a nominal donation to the Maddie finding fund (NEXT YEAR IN THE SEYCHELLES!)
The media/PR strategy in the US appears to be very different than over here. Here it's oh so humble apologies. Over there the WSJ today publishes an editorial claiming the journalism that uncovered all this is the equivalent of the wikileaks embassy stuff i.e they're trying to kill our boys. Along with a host of other aggressive attacks they'd not dare print over here. Plan to poison the atmosphere against people who attack Murdoch before any real US revelations come out.
That's a tad misleading, since all the tabloids indulge in that sort of thing (i.e. unsubstantiated gossip and innuendo)This sort of cynicism toward the McCann family regarding their efforts to find their daughter is normally the sort of thing the NotW would indulge in...
News Corp purchase The Wall Street Journal: ''The US$5 billion sale added The Wall Street Journal to Rupert Murdoch's news empire, which already included Fox News Channel, financial network unit and London's The Times, and locally within New York, the New York Post, along with Fox flagship station WNYW (Channel 5) and MyNetworkTV flagship WWOR (Channel 9).''[23]The media/PR strategy in the US appears to be very different than over here. Here it's oh so humble apologies. Over there the WSJ today publishes an Wall Street Journal (WSJ) editorial claiming the journalism that uncovered all this is the equivalent of the wikileaks embassy stuff i.e they're trying to kill our boys. Along with a host of other aggressive attacks they'd not dare print over here. Plan to poison the atmosphere against people who attack Murdoch before any real US revelations come out.
invisibleplanet said:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wal...Corp._purchase