Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Missing Milly Dowler's voicemail "hacked by News of the World"

The audaciousness of The Sun printing a front page apology today - not from itself to the people of the UK and beyond, no, the fact that the Guardian was slipped dodgy info, they took the bait, and were then forced to refute dodgy info by Murdochs legal attack dogs. Classic ambush, but for the Scum to champion an apology now, not theirs, that as some sort of desperate righteous claw reaching from the cesspool of evil they might attain victim status???

Fuck that. Stomp those bony claws back into the mire.
 
I doubt there's much love between Berlusconi and Murdoch.

Sky Italia is the underdog challenger to Berlusconi's stranglehold on Italian TV.

Which certainly provides for some very interesting meetings. Follow the money!

Murdoch vs The Real Italian Mafia, there's a scrap that could get very ugly in a few months.
 
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/07/15/us-newscorp-mockridge-idUSTRE76E3U720110715

This Mockridge guy is here to set up The Scum On Sunday.

That's his probable mission brief. Murdoch is pro-active, hence the ridiculous front page of the Scum today.

Who knows what they'll print tomorrow. It's almost poetic, the level of fail.

sundaysun_portraitFINAL.jpg
 
I have a question about the clearance the Prime Minister's personnel must have to work at Downing Street.

I am asking because I still can't get my head around the fact that Cameron employed someone whose background check should have produced funnies, and we are talking about the Communications Director who, during his employment, must have had access to sensitive and/or classified information/documents whilst his background was questionable at best criminal at worst implicating the PM himself given that he had authorised the employment.

Don't they have something like a Yankee White clearance the purpose of which is to, in the long run, proctect the President's office from potentially toxic people?

This scandal just keeps giving and giving...

Anyone familiar with the Downing Street clearance requirements?
 
So why has hinton resigned?

He's not been in the story much up till now.

Does he know there's more shit coming?
 
So why has hinton resigned?

He's not been in the story much up till now.

Does he know there's more shit coming?
Claimed he had no evidence it went beyond one reporter to a select comittee but he headed up the internal investigation by news international that turned up the evidence handed over to police, its rather implausable that he headed an investigation that found evidnence that it stretched beyond one reporter but did know about the evidence.
 
The audaciousness of The Sun printing a front page apology today - not from itself to the people of the UK and beyond, no, the fact that the Guardian was slipped dodgy info, they took the bait, and were then forced to refute dodgy info by Murdochs legal attack dogs. Classic ambush, but for the Scum to champion an apology now, not theirs, that as some sort of desperate righteous claw reaching from the cesspool of evil they might attain victim status???

Similarly, I was well fucking irritated listening to Harriet Harman castigating the tories for getting right in there with Murdoch for their own ends....and then suggesting that NL just did much the same because they were scared...AWWWWWWWWWW! :(


Anyway....I keep meaning to ask about Newscorp's hold in the US but I'm not sure it's appropriate on this thread :hmm:

I know ymu mentioned that US journailsts are expressly forbidden from accepting hospitality - and also that the press is generally just much better regulated over there.
Well I didn't know that until just recently and I only know (from this thread) that Murdoch owns the Wall Street Journal (I think?) but presume he owns others too (and I know there's Fox, obv, and that this news has now started trickling through even there).

I'm not sure what I'm asking really :hmm: simple stuff, tbf :D - is their press effectively regulated already, so just not open to this shite?

So there most likely just wouldn't be anything similar coming from US based Newscorp operations?
So any bother there would almost certainly come from the UK press hacking (for eg) 9/11 victims/families - and the other stuff about journalists not being allowed to bribe international officials (which is big enough on it's own, I know!)......but also how much *influence* Murdoch would be likely to have had, politically, by way of his grip on the media there (which is rather more minimal - again because of set legal limitations)?

Soz for the waffle (am shit at formulating questions) but *out of interest* sort of thing... :hmm:
 
Murdoch did'nt exactly play a blinder this week did he? one would expect decisive action and a crisp soundbite from an allegedly smart and ruthless businessman,instead our image of him is of a frail,wizened,bewildered looking old man in a trackie and baseball cap with his personal trainer,looking more like a gaga patient with his nurse.
 
Murdoch did'nt exactly play a blinder this week did he? one would expect decisive action and a crisp soundbite from an allegedly smart and ruthless businessman,instead our image of him is of a frail,wizened,bewildered looking old man in a trackie and baseball cap with his personal trainer,looking more like a gaga patient with his nurse.

Guardian diary yesterday was asking whether News Corp might be providing photo opportunities of frail old man while discouraging pictures of thrusting young [criminal] son...
 
Murdoch did'nt exactly play a blinder this week did he? one would expect decisive action and a crisp soundbite,instead our image of him is of a frail,old man in a trackie and baseball cap with his personal trainer,looking more like a gaga patient with his nurse.

Yep - this is all alien to him. He is compltely unused to having to explain or defend himself - let alone apologise. Its usually its him on the attack. But he's being systematically and publiclly humiliated - forced to close his most proftiable paper, forced into sacking his mates, forced to explain himself to MPs (oh that must smart), forced to print public apologies - and going to be seriously out of pocket by the time this is all over.
 
Yep - this is all alien to him. He is compltely unused to having to explain or defend himself - let alone apologise. Its usually its him on the attack. But he's being systematically and publiclly humiliated - forced to close his most proftiable paper, forced into sacking his mates, forced to explain himself to MPs (oh that must smart), forced to print public apologies - and going to be seriously out of pocket by the time this is all over.
Whats that german word?? begins with s :D
 
Back
Top Bottom