No, it isn't, not really.
The Festiniog & Rheildol both had periods using oil-firing very successfully, and then went back to coal.
I doubt it. Weld up a tank and put it in the coal space in the tender. An electric feed pump and stainless steel armoured flexible fuel pipes to deliver the fuel to a burner mounted just above the grate in the firebox. The main problem could be that the amount of heat radiated from the grate area might be lower, so you would get less steam raised in the firebox and you might be more likely to burn out the fire tubes and superheater, I guess. I just wonder what the experience of the 1940s retrofits was.Presumably it requires a new grate, though, plus the oil tank and feed equipment? That is a going to be pretty big job on standard-gauge engines.
The article that I just quoted suggest that oil burning was cleaner, so local environmental effects would be less. Point taken about the environmental cost of refining, but fuel oil has a fair bit less carbon per BTU than coal*, so it would have to be an inefficient refinery to cancel out the global difference.I imagine the environmental impact would be even higher using oil.
I doubt it. Weld up a tank and put it in the coal space in the tender. An electric feed pump and stainless steel armoured flexible fuel pipes to deliver the fuel to a burner mounted just above the grate in the firebox. The main problem could be that the amount of heat radiated from the grate area might be lower, so you would get less steam raised in the firebox and you might be more likely to burn out the fire tubes and superheater, I guess. I just wonder what the experience of the 1940s retrofits was.
This article implies that it failed because of a lack of foreign exchange, rather than any technical or cost issues: GWR oil - fired locomotives
Of course, lack of foreign exchange could become an issue this time, but then it would pay to open up the British pits ...
Agreed. Plus fuel oil just doesn't have the same smell as Welsh anthracite...AFAIK you're right and the conversions worked okay, and the issue was paying for the oil. Tbh if that did become a problem again I don't think keeping a few steam engines running would be very high on anyone's priority list! I do still think that the cost of conversions would be beyond a lot of operators, though, especially after Covid has taken a sledgehammer to their incomes, so at the very least conversion to oil would see a substantial drop in the number of operable engines.
Agreed. Plus fuel oil just doesn't have the same smell as Welsh anthracite...
Absolutely. Hand firing is an art, too, which it'd be a pity to see die off.
Yes - I have fired a Polish loco with Polish coal , at a horrible hour of the day. It nearly killed me for graft and dirt - and forget all the "measured , little and often" means of firing as all the books tell you. I was told to chuck in massive lumps and soaking wet slack - which blacked out the sky. I looked worse than a miner on stepping down.
I'm sure you can guess how envious I am of that! I've been reading and watching a bit on world railways of late, not least the old Ian Allan series on world steam from the 90s, which is all on dailymotion, and one thing that's struck me is how much cleaner British steam railways were than some in other parts of the world, at least in part because of the quality of British coal. Obviously steam engines are inherently dirty things, but the vast clouds of black smoke you see in - for example - Colin Garratt's photographs of African steam weren't a thing here.
From the age of 14 I used to drive and fire NCB Austerity locomotives (father had good connections) - basic work -no niceties on cut off , full regulator and full forward gear . In the 1980's as "Train Manager" on the Salisbury steam runs I got short exposures on the main line - firing in good weather and with good engines *Clan Line and the 8F one afternoon) - the 8F was a doddle , but the Merchant Navy had an insatiable appetite. The Salisbury crews were great , but one jokingly said he would not have taken me off the shed in say 1960. Most of the coal was on the cab floor , not in the box. All good clean lump coal though to be fair.
Rub it in, why don't you!
Is this one of those really rare things much sort after by spotters or just an every day maintenance thing?View attachment 249643
There was something else nearby by but couldn't get close enough for a picture.
What's the very rare thing much sort after by train spotters? Is it something to do with checking the track?
Look at this beauty! Starting bid at £50,000.
View attachment 249855
View attachment 249856
Former Signal Box, Newton Road, Torquay, TQ2 5EU - Online Auctions
Property for sale online in Torquay closing on 04/02/2021 with a Guide Price of £54,000+. - Online Auctionspaulfosh.eigonlineauctions.com
Shall we all chip in and make it an U75 collective timeshare?
We have a dedicated thread for this kind of tomfoolery:DON'T do this!
I have seen other similar stories like this recently. Crazy.
Tidemills level crossing: Woman lies on tracks for photo
The woman could have "been moments away from a catastrophic incident", police say.www.bbc.co.uk
This vintage transport film, produced by British Transport Films in 1962, details the challenges of moving a new power station transformer by rail to Blaenau Ffestiniog, Wales.
This is fascinating stuff