Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact
  • Hi Guest,
    We have now moved the boards to the new server hardware.
    Search will be impaired while it re-indexes the posts.
    See the thread in the Feedback forum for updates and feedback.
    Lazy Llama

miners strike 84/85

Vimto

I presume that was a joke, the thought of being even the thought of being slightly to the left makes me puke. Oh well better go and listen to my 3 editions of billy Bolloxs latest hit single NOT
 
Just to make clear - my previous statement is accurate able the triple time rates - according to my old teacher anyway - I would love to know if this could be verified.

RightisGood - Please argue your points politely - your rudeness does you no favours. A good right wing argument is fine by me - a rude personalising response is a bit Infantile
 
Having spent

13 years in the police trust me there no such thing, as triple time. And only double time on public holidays. Maybe you should check your facts out before jumping on the old kill all coppers bandwagon which is what everyone else wants to do
 
you still

have not given any proof of the police being paid triple time, please show the proof of this or do issue such lies
 
It may come as a surprise to any of you that have read anything I have posted but my dad was (and is) a cop and drove a riot van at the time of 1984/85 strike. I am ashamed of the things he did to aid Thatcher and needless the say we don't agree on mos things these days but even he admits that the strike was all about breaking the unions. One thing he told me though was the Thatcher government implemented something known in plice circles as the "edmond davies plan". This was a plan for massive pay rises accross the board for all cops in the UK that had been drawn up by Callaghan but never implemented. Thatcher put it into practice as soon as she came to power for one purpose only - to motivate the cops to break the unions. As soon as the strike and wapping were over police pay went down again.

The truth is that the governments tactics in the mining industry had nothing to do with "profitability" and everything to do with anihilationg TU power (what there was of it) by destroying heavy industry. All those out there who believed Thatchers rhetoric I ask you to look up what the Ridley plan was. This was drawn up by Thathcers advisor Nicholas Ridley in order to break the unions. The plan was to tackle the weak steel unions first before going after the strongest, the NUM. The industries that could have won the strike for the miners by coming out in solidarity were either bought off or the union leaders were to cowardly to act.
 
Zapher, try selling your argument in south derbryshire and yorkshire where umeployment is a serious problem and the far right is on the rise in places like Ilkeston etc.
 
Red Alex, I was brought up in Yorkshire. Rydal Rd, Atlantic Rd. My dad was on a lathe for Sheffield Twist Drill. Later became an inspector. Christ mate, my ancestory lies in Sheffield soil.

As I said on another thread, if I'd been born before the welfare state, I'd have been a firebrand activist of the left. But things get achieved, things move on, and you have to look at the current situation and project it into the future.

Politics is a slow pendulum. Things move from left to right, right to left, but eventually TOO far in either direction. The trick is to recognise when an extreme zone has been reached, and push the other way.

I know everyone here thinks I'm against the left, but if I'm still around in 12 years, I'll probably be posting against the right. Not because I'VE changed ...
 
Mrs M is expecting to get shot down in flames for this...but hey! I'm pissed!

I spent a lot of time, trouble and money supporting the miners for reasons that may not be readily appreciated...............

OK first things first....my grandfather was a special constable during the General Strike in the 20's.....I know I shall regret saying this, but what the hell! IT'S HONEST!

I supported the Miners Strike in the mid 80s, not because of my work colleagues who really bullied me, as a single parent who really REALLY needed the money, and had to choose between crossing a picket line and feeding my children, (my kids won) but because of my grandfather, who was technically a scab. He was an old-fashioned Tory who HATED Thatcher (most old-school Tories did). He really, perhaps in a paternalistic way, really respected working-class men. When he was a special constable in the 1920s in Liverpool, he had huge respect for the Strikers. His job in the General Strike was to stop strikers from crossing the railway lines at Lime Street....he always turned a blind eye 'cos they were going to tend their allotments....All he wanted to do in the General Strike was to drive a train....heigh ho.........He was normally a doctor........pre-NHS remember....he would never charge if the famliy couldn't afford it...he was not from a rich family himself........which was why when he left Whitechapel as a young doctor he ended up in Toxteth.........he remembered Margaret Simey (SP?) as a young fiery woman in the 1930's

I supported the miners and during the strike, we (me and my colleagues) took all the kids from a pit in Yorkshire, and gave them a great holiday, everything taken care of, and gave them an all expenses paid holiday.....The women and kids were great, but their husbands, the striking miners, were some of the most racist, sexist and homophobic men I have ever met in my life.............
 
Mrs M ---- Having been brought up in a mining community myself --- I can testify to the macho culture that abounded there !!!

However -- they were CERTAINLY NOT " The MOST racist, sexist etc that I`ve ever come across (Alas) !

Getting back to the point though,
Does anyone recall the article in "The Economist" called :

"They saw it coming!"
It was first published in about `80 (I think) & later re-published by them after the strike was over. It outlined exactly how the government had developed a strategy to smash the NUM, co-ordinate police tactics,handle coal imports etc ---?
 
Originally posted by Zapher
I know everyone here thinks I'm against the left, but if I'm still around in 12 years, I'll probably be posting against the right. Not because I'VE changed ...

You know, I very much doubt that, Zapher.
You say you supported the State against the workers in the 70's and 80's, and now you're a boss. How do you think Hitler + Mussolini got into power? Because there was a mass workers' movement with the aim of seizing the means of production, and the State wasn't quite strong enough to stop them on its own so in step businessmen + capitalists (such as yourself) who back the fascists in order to maintain their positions of power + affluence.

People like you always oppose progressive, pro-democracy movements (suffragettes, anti-apartheid etc.) so I don't see much chance of you changing (unless you lose your business, or perhaps if you realise what sort of world your children or grandchildren are going to grow up in [but that might be a bit too unselfish for you...]).
 
Icepick, to post up a conclusion like the one above against me, you either haven't understood where I'm coming from, or I haven't made myself clear. Whichever, no matter. Hopefully most others have understood, even though they may not agree with my stance.

I'm off for a long weekend now, out of London (going to a Steam Rally -- always a brilliant atmosphere). Hope you enjoy your break too.
 
I've just noticed something.

Rightisgood, you claim:

Having spent 13 years in the police trust me there no such thing, as triple time.

On your profile, you give your birthday as 11 October 1980, making you 21.

Unless you joined the police at age 8, one of these statements isn't true. So which is it?


btw Zapher, I envy you. Steam rally sounds a nice way to spend the weekend. :)
 
Zapher: You go to steam rallies?

There's a guy in Salisbury who's a real steam nut. He's got a steam-powered lorry from the 1920s which he keeps in working order, plus the most beautiful traction engine. Also, he's a nice chap. He's got a website, I'll see if I can find the link to it over the weekend.

I collect fairground bits and pieces, so sometimes go to rallies meself, money permitting. Have fun!
 
At the risk of turning this into a thread about old machinery, I had a ride on a traction engine once and still can't think of many nicer ways to spend a sunny afternoon than lumbering through lovely countryside on one.

Something about the smell of steam engines. Very evocative, I think.

<anyway, back on topic>

:) :)
 
Originally posted by bezzer
I’m Just interested really, if anyone on hear, took part in the miners strike, and remembers some of the brutality that was involved or what was going on in the media at the time and ultimately why and how the pitt closures went ahead.

Only just seen this thread and haven't read all the posts, so I may just be going over ground already covered. But here are a few personal memories of the Strike...

There have been a lot of complicated arguments over whether you should have bveen for/against the miners, but I can boil it down to this: The miners had been given a raw deal by a vicious Tory Goverment, that for reasons of petty spite and revenge [for 72/74] as well as political ideology was prepared to destroy an industry and all the jobs and communities that depended upon it. Whatever disagreements you may have had about how the Strike was run etc, I think they deserved to be supported in taking the fight back to the government. When they lost, it was a blow for everyone who suffered under Thatcher at that time.

The stuff about uneconomic pits was bullshit. It was much more uneconomic to close the industry down, along with all the other ones that directly or indirectly depended on mining [everything from the factory I used to work at which made support structures for the mineshafts to the newsagents across the road from the local pit]. All those workers on the dole rather than earning wages, meaning the tax-payers having to pay them their benefits as well as their reduced spending power depressing the local economy as a whole.

My dad had been a miner and a left-wing NUM activist, but he'd died in 1980; I'm positive he would have backed the Strike 100%, but I remember that at his old pit, on the Derbys/Notts border, only 17 were out throughout the Strike. It caused a lot of bitterness and division; I had big rows with friends/relatives who opposed the strike.

As for the police, I was living in Derbys and working over the border in Notts at the time and got stopped day in day out at the border by the cops, who always searched us and the car; Once, they found a copy of 'the Miner' which I'd been given by a striking mate and took down the car's number and said that if it was seen anywhere near a picket line, we'd be arrested on the spot.

The Tories were well organized and had planned the whole thing out years in advance [the Ridley Plan]. But a major factor in why the miners lost was the lack of support they got from the rest of the labour movement - be it the unions or the Labour Party, which was already then making the move to the right to appeal to the 'moderate' floating voter and didn't want to be seen to give any support to militancy.

This was reflected to some extent in my local Labour Party branch, which had to be seen to be believed. One prominent local Labour councillor [he still is btw] was a scab at the nearby depot and the left in the branch somehow managed to get them to pass a resolution debarring him from being present when the strike was discussed; so whenever anything to do with the strike came up on the agenda, everyone would point at him and he had to go and sit in the bar until someone called him back in :rolleyes: .

More seriously, I remember when the Miners' Wives Support Groups were set up, a local member came to the branch to appeal for support and of course some cash for their fighting fund. She went in expecting, as you would, to get a sympathetic hearing. She looked so shocked when one right-winger after another just laid into her and the strike in general. The secretary of the branch Women's Section yelled at her to 'bugger off and not come back begging again' [this is true, really:( ]. The poor miners wife was so shaken - she had been talking about joining the Labour Party, but a few months later she joined the WRP instead.

There were times when the miners might have won - like when NACODS, the pit deputies' union voted 82% to come out; but there was always a reluctance by the union & Labour leadership to do anything that would make strike action look legitimate or strengthen the left.

One lasting memory is from a rally in London just after the end of the Strike. Union leader Ken Gill praised the miners and then said he was proud of the 'magnificent support they got from the working class and the labour movement'. A miner behind me shouted 'BOLLOCKS' at the top of his voice. I think many miners and their families were politicized during the Strike and had their views on such as the state/media/police altered forever, but having stood up for so long, only to be defeated caused a lot of demoralization and bitterness.
 
I picked on the particular subject of the miners strike for a myriad of reasons really, essentially my objectives were truthful. To be put Plain and simply, I was too young to remember the strikes apart from a vague consciousness of the time and being able to link later events to it. As I grew up and read and watched TV, occasionally I would come across the subject of the strikes.

Looking into the issue in the last few days and reading your responses to this thread certainly has helped to build up a clearer picture, cheers.

I don’t really feel qualified to talk about it as an issue but …

reading some of the posts, has really been very gut wrenching , I’m over whelmed, and angry and its also been funny… black hand, and his the story about the snowman. Its frustrating as well, because I want to say more, but its like that feeling you get, when perhaps you think its better to just to say nothing and keep it simple.

At the very least I’m going to read some more, and maybe do some work on it, if I get around to doing my website. These things should be preserved and remembered, very very important. And at times like the golden jubilee, its good to be reminded what real history is.
 
:) never visted this site b4, but it is really heart warming to read these postings about the miners. this is just a short posting. i will write about my experiences later. i just felt i had to say a warm hello to everybody as i will certainly be dropping by here a lot more in future, thanx all for caring.....

not sure how these smilie things work tho!!:eek: :D :p :cool: will these print on my posting? excuse the newbie pls, cheers
 
bump, hello kupa, welcome to the boards, spec P/P, we need all hands, look forward to hearing your contribution, mine is being prepared, bit nervous as i admit some failings...
 
Originally posted by rorymac
I was involved with benefits for the miners at the time and the stories that they'd tell about intimidation/violence by the police etc was sickening.
Thatcher and every bastard in her government involved with the treatment the miners received want fucking torturing.
The same goes for the lying fuckers in the media.:mad:
Tory cunts.


Scargill's stated intent was to bring down the government. This is not acceptable in a democracy.

Saw what was happening at the time, some of those posting are looking at things through rose tinted spectacles. the level of violence perpetrated by the strikers was horrifying. Have a look at the newsreels of the time.
 
Violence was not a one-sided thing, Gremlin.

And I can't understand how anyone who claims to care about democracy could support Thatcher anyway. She did more harm to democracy in this country than any leader in recent times. She turned local government into a clique of unelected, Tory-dominated quangoes, she abolished democratic institutions that got in her way, she gave the police licence to behave like thugs, she centralised government to an even more ridiculous extent than it was centralised anyway.

We'd be in a better state if Scargill had toppled her or, better still, if the evil hag had dropped dead in 1978.

Rightisgood, notice you've gone quiet. Still mulling over your answer to how you managed to join the police at age eight? :rolleyes:
 
Originally posted by Oscar
Violence was not a one-sided thing, Gremlin.

And I can't understand how anyone who claims to care about democracy could support Thatcher anyway. She did more harm to democracy in this country than any leader in recent times. She turned local government into a clique of unelected, Tory-dominated quangoes, she abolished democratic institutions that got in her way, she gave the police licence to behave like thugs, she centralised government to an even more ridiculous extent than it was centralised anyway.

We'd be in a better state if Scargill had toppled her or, better still, if the evil hag had dropped dead in 1978.

Everyone, as they say, is entitled to their opinion. Local councillors were elected by the populace in 1984, just as they are now. QUANGOS have increased under Blair, and his habit of putting friends and donors into positions of real power is there to be seen, The lord chancellor, the science minister ( Sainsbury ) , transport minister ( Gus MacDonald ) all into government positions by making them life peers.

The deep mining industry in the UK had been losing about a million pounds a day for a long time. we simply could not compete with imported coal on a price basis, nor was it reasonable t support mining financially at the expense of other social needs.

Margaret Thatchers action in breaking the poewr of the trade unions laid the basis of todays prosperity.

Edited to say: I agree that the violence was not one sided, there was excessive violence by both sides, the injuries caused to the police horses was nauseating though.
 
I'm not going to be drawn into an argument on Trade Unionism, because it would just be covering the ground already cocvered in this thread. Suffice to say that bashing the unions was as much about finding a political scapegoat for a bad situation as improving the economy. As I said, using the example of the car industry, trade unions weren't designing or marketing the cars or investing in new plant and equipment; rubbish management was at least as much to blame for the crisis of the 1970s as the unions.

I quite agree that Blair is a master at cronyism and quango-government, but he's only following a precedent that Mrs T set.

there aren't many people I hate, but Mrs Thatcher is one of them. I don't say this lightly, but I sincerely wish she had dropped down dead before she got anywhere near the position of power she so grossly abused.
 
Originally posted by Oscar
I'm not going to be drawn into an argument on Trade Unionism, because it would just be covering the ground already cocvered in this thread. Suffice to say that bashing the unions was as much about finding a political scapegoat for a bad situation as improving the economy. As I said, using the example of the car industry, trade unions weren't designing or marketing the cars or investing in new plant and equipment; rubbish management was at least as much to blame for the crisis of the 1970s as the unions.

I quite agree that Blair is a master at cronyism and quango-government, but he's only following a precedent that Mrs T set.

there aren't many people I hate, but Mrs Thatcher is one of them. I don't say this lightly, but I sincerely wish she had dropped down dead before she got anywhere near the position of power she so grossly abused.

I think we will have to agree to disagree on that one Oscar :)

You have a valid point about poor management though, I feel that this is still the case.
 
I agree, but I think the problem is systemic. Britain's financial system is very much geared to short-term profit rather than long term growth. Takeovers and mergers are prized as a positive good, so companies add shareholder value by swallowing each other up rather than through genuine innovation. The financial system is centred on London and is insensitive to real needs elsewhere.

With the exception of the last, all of the above problems were created or exacerbated by Thatcherism.
 
Originally posted by Oscar
I agree, but I think the problem is systemic. Britain's financial system is very much geared to short-term profit rather than long term growth. Takeovers and mergers are prized as a positive good, so companies add shareholder value by swallowing each other up rather than through genuine innovation. The financial system is centred on London and is insensitive to real needs elsewhere.

With the exception of the last, all of the above problems were created or exacerbated by Thatcherism.

Have you looked at waht is happening in the pharmaceutical industry? Bristol Myers and Glaxo Smith Klein are talking of merging............there are 46 original companies in those two groups. we will end up with perhaps 5 pharmaceutical companies controlling 95% of the market. Not good news.
 
Back
Top Bottom